Photomode Tournament - Qualifying Poll - PMC

[NTX]

____________________

This poll is multiple choice.​

You may vote for as many photos that you like.
You may only submit your votes 1 time.
Recheck your votes, before you submit.
Make sure all your votes are correct.
If you pay attention to what you are doing, this should not be a problem.
Do not vote for your own entry.

Poll will last for 5 days.​

____________________​

The 16 most voted entries will advance to round 1 of the Tournament​

Good luck to all​

 

[Tulok]

no poll here....
EDIT
sorry it hoguth u made them at the SAME time

 

[Loon]

Patience young grasshopper.

 

[Mind SV]

Geez Tulok, Calm Down Hes creating the poll now.

 

[NTX]

Here is the poll!
Remember, do not say which one is your entry. U can say when the poll is closed.
The Qualifiers names will be known after the poll is closed

 

[Tulok]

I voted

 

[[empty space]]

much love for the spyker image 👍

 

[dmanbluesfreak]

Wait, were we supposed to vote for ourselves, then?

 

[Cod_Father]

Wow guys, some seriously incredible shots here. I had to check to make sure this wasn't the 2.0 comp

 

[NTX]

No Dman, no voting on our own entries, just our favourite ones:tup:

I hope everything is ok, my 1st poll in GTP.

 

[dmanbluesfreak]

That Spyker shot is HOTTT!!! Whoever made it, please PM me how you got those colors (I've already voted, so it wont sway my decision).

 

[SlipZtrEm]

Gotta hand it to the PMC guys for almost always putting that much more effort into their shots in-game; no throwing a blur filter at ugly textures .

I'll give a bit of a breakdown on the ones I did vote on:

M3 - While I can't stand the bling wheels, I love the rich colour of this shot and the fact the architecture forces you towards the car. Could've used a less brutal contrast adjustment, just so we could see the details, but on the other hand, this does give it a certain brooding quality. Nice!

Spyker - We've seen this type of shot before, but this one is done differently enough to really catch the eye. The fact the car is angled upwards, towards the light above it, is so much better than being tilted the other way. Incredible.

300SL - Heh, I have a funny feeling I know who's behind this one. Focus on the lighting, focus on the fact that most 2.0 entries aren't this clean. Reminds me of old film noire movies.

Alpine - Another I think I may know, photog-wise! Extreme angle, clean tone, smooth reflections. A well-done shot, that angle, done by someone less talented, would be a disaster.

Monaro - Composition! Great colour choice!

NSX - Ees sooo simpuh . So what, it's a well done shot and has been fiddled with just enough to make it stand out. Crazy contrast with that Lancer above it.

2002 - The shot could've been tighter, and I could see a crazy wide-angle shot working better, but as is I like it a lot, just because it's a solid drift shot.

Caddy - An unusual composition, I like how simple it is while being so unexpected at the same time. The colour is just what I like to see .

Vanquish - Could use less blur, just got my vote, because that car is so easy to shoot and the surroundings suit it very well. Could've used more padding on the lower border.

That black Elise would've made it for me if it weren't for the wheel being turned in that direction. I understand the other way is more usual and expected, but it's because it looks far better than the textureless black of the tire.

 

[Speedster502]

Some really nice shots here. Absoultley brilliant photos. That 300SL shot is evil it has a nice esscensce about it. Brilliant shots guys and keep it up!

 

[jgda9rs]

goddamn!!!!!! O_O i had to check the forum again, made sure i wasn't looking at some 2.0 comp hardcore!!!!!! even some of the entries here would own my 2.0 entry easily!

 

[atlop]

Wow, I did not think the poll would be this hard! And crap, I missed the multiple choice thing. My only vote went for the Vanquish. 👍

This is going to be a good tournament!

 

[Beerz]

I can't possibly figure out how some of these shots were made, such beatiful entries with so limited tools...

But weren't they supposed to be 'borderless'? Shot only, that's what I thought.

And is that 'PMC' logo on the top of the NY building there during the game?

 

[jgda9rs]

i was actually gonna mention that. very good point. could be a rule infringement...since pmc rules state that editting software could only be used to adjust brightness/contrast (or gamma, not sure) and stuff, i forgot whatelse. no pun intended, but i'm just pointing out rules...though it would suck if it gets d.q'd since i voted for that entry

 

[D-Mind]

Some amazing entries

 

[NTX]

Borders are allowed, I do not remember saying anything to do not use them.
About that shot of new york saying PMC...I think we can "close our eyes" to that, just this time, c´mon...👍

 

[atlop]

But weren't they supposed to be 'borderless'? Shot only, that's what I thought.

No, that was in the CCCL comp, not this one.

And since we are talking about rules, is this going to be an "anonymous" comp all the way? I agree it makes sense to have the quali round anonymous, but in the actual bracket when it's one person agains oneother, and we know who these two are, the anonymous thing seems a bit artificial at that point. Especially when you in many cases just know who made each shot anyway.

 

[freddy86]

Yeah! These shots are sexy! Went with the following: 3, 4, 7, 9, 13, 15, 18

Some of those entries would have made it in the 2.0 as well if you ask me! 👍

 

[Beerz]

Borders are allowed, I do not remember saying anything to do not use them.
About that shot of new york saying PMC...I think we can "close our eyes" to that, just this time, c´mon...👍

Ok, my bad then. (Damn, should've read the rules properly and added one to my entry )

On the PMC sign, I'm fine with it, just pointing it out. It's just the qualifiyng anyway.

No, that was in the CCCL comp, not this one.

And since we are talking about rules, is this going to be an "anonymous" comp all the way? I agree it makes sense to have the quali round anonymous, but in the actual bracket when it's one person agains oneother, and we know who these two are, the anonymous thing seems a bit artificial at that point. Especially when you in many cases just know who made each shot anyway.

I have nothing against it, since there will only be a couple of duels throughout the tournament where we won't know who made each shot, so it does get kind of pointless.

 

[NTX]

no guys, round 1 will be like previous tournaments, no more anonymous entries after this qualifying round. It will like the last one host by Jacoja, random matches on every rounds, its more fun because we don´t know who we are gonna face next. 👍

 

[Tommi]

Some amazing shots here guys:tup:
I didn't notice the multiple choice thing but i voted for the 3rd shot:tup:

 

[Vince247]

Some amazing shots here guys:tup:
I didn't notice the multiple choice thing but i voted for the 3rd shot:tup:

I Agree.

maybe next time take a more carfull look at the poll, tommi

The Spyker, 300 SL and the vanquish did it for me. Too bad mine sucks compared with the one's I mentioned...
Ah well, it isn't a first entry for nothing.

 

[Tangled Web]

I am amazed at the high quality of these shots. This poll in a way is more impressive than the 2.0 poll. I love the 300SL shot, my favourite out of all of them.
Superb work guys, look forward to seeing what else you all come up with. 👍

 

[D-Mind]

I don't mean to be rude, but i feel quite sorry for the RX-7 shot.. 0 votes..

 

[Vince247]

I don't mean to be rude, but i feel quite sorry for the RX-7 shot.. 0 votes..

I don't mean to be rude too, but you get what you deserve, don't you?

 

[D-Mind]

I don't mean to be rude too, but you get what you deserve, don't you?

I get? It's not my shot

 

[Beerz]

Ray, I don't think he meant you literally.

Anyway, as to the RX-7 shot, it's not a bad shot, the only thing is that it is virtually unedited, apart from the resizing. It's not cropped, nor it had the tidiest bit of contrast in it, those 2 things alone would make it look 10x better in 20secs.