- 4,387
- Lisboa
GT4 Photo Mode Competition
Week 134 Poll
Theme: Phototravel
- Do NOT vote for your own entry.
- Have confidence in your own photo and don't try to sway the poll.
I agree, but maybe you should start a new thread about this?The top 10, poll system doesn't work well, there are 3 entries that are better than a few of the shots in the poll. I keep seeing this trend, it seems shots that get a lot of comments keep getting snubbed from these polls. Quite frankly this is why ppl grow bored with the comps, and stop coming around with entries. Then you all wonder why you get periods of having a hard time filling 10 in a poll. Why enter, if you a just going to get snubbed; in this case one person eliminated 11 ppl, rather than having the voters decide who has the best shot, the one choosing the poll decides who doesn't.
IMO all the shots need to be in these polls, and let the field decide. I am only speaking up because this needs to be changed if you guys want newer ppl, to keep submitting entries, and stay around awhile. Or you can keep the old system, and run into months where you have a hard time filling a poll.
I agree, but maybe you should start a new thread about this?
Thanks GrumpEone!!!! I'm flattered.BTW- Swiss' Shot is easily better than 3 of the shots in the poll- a blind man could see that!
I can see why the rule is there, other wise we'd have potential tie breaker polls for weeks.The rules need and upgrade, as Beerz said, this is a very long story actually. People have been using not allowed tools for months or years... and so on.
The 10 limit was a reasonable rule when comps reached dozens of entries in the past.
Salu2.alexwrc
Well, did you (or anyone else) said anything about it? Did you point that out at the time? Did you even ask that person (or those persons) what tools/filters/etc they used on the shot and how they got certain result?And there have been comps (very recently) where you can obviously see that more editing was done than allowed, and nothing is done about it. sucks.
Well, did you (or anyone else) said anything about it? Did you point that out at the time? Did you even ask that person (or those persons) what tools/filters/etc they used on the shot and how they got certain result?
I'm betting no. Which doesn't make you look that good now, because whenever someone wants things to be transparent, they want it always.
About your shot:
Art is subjective. Always has, always will be.
I also think your Speedster looks better than some other shots, but everyone has different tastes. Don't try to change that. Won't happen.
There's no right or wrong on that subject. 👍
There was already a full thread with a poll about this subject, not that long ago, not much came out of it.
Imo, best thing is to let each comp's host to decide what they want for each separate comp.
No poll (everyone has a chance to be voted for), 10 poll with theme provider choosing who makes it, variable according to the number of submissions that week... There's plenty to choose from.
The rules need and upgrade, as Beerz said, this is a very long story actually. People have been using not allowed tools for months or years... and so on.
The 10 limit was a reasonable rule when comps reached dozens of entries in the past.
Thanks GrumpEone!!!! I'm flattered.
I can see why the rule is there, other wise we'd have potential tie breaker polls for weeks...
...Art is subjective. Always has, always will be.
I also think your Speedster looks better than some other shots, but everyone has different tastes. Don't try to change that. Won't happen.
There's no right or wrong on that subject. 👍
I don't usually like to complain about this sort of thing but I am amazed at how I did not get in to the polls. To be honest to myself, the overall composure of the image is near-perfect:
Any tips on why it didn't get in? I need some help here.[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/CENTER]
Look, I know some of you guys think there are some shots which could have made it into the top 10, but in the end of the day, someone has to pick 10 out of the dozens of entries. Its hard to choose shots which may look good to you, but bad to others (or the other way around) I think NTX1982 did a good job of posting the top 10. 👍
The 10 limit was a reasonable rule when comps reached dozens of entries in the past.
I was just voicing that I didn't make the top ten for the first time. (time for me to be more original).
I am not the original host of it, I didnt invented the rules, so I didnt feel the right to change them. The top 10 worked through 13x weeks.
Well you were not quite clear whether you actually thought the shot was edited. I did take a look though and could not see anything wrong in the shot. Perhaps would have been better to PM me about it if you felt something was wrong. Still, I do think the shot was ok.There was also un-edited wk 21 where I thought a shot was edited, and said it-nicely, but nothing happened (if I was supposed to actually complain I didn't know, am I supposed to PM the host?)
This one was well discussed back then and rules changed accordingly.Swiss Legend: Yeah, I felt the same way as well. Like NTX1982's UEC W22 entry ....
My whole point here, is to try to instigate a little change, to make the comps better, and draw more entries by people actually staying around to enter comps. consistently.
Why do people, stick around for a few comps, and then only occasionally enter a comp?? When you actually take the time to put in a good entry, and you are not in the poll, it gets annoying, even if there are 10 shots better than yours. Also, it makes the time you took getting the shot you wanted, feel almost like a waste of time, just because 1 person, doesn't like your shot, or has a grudge against you, or even doesn't like a particular car.
I already have been snubbed from a few polls, where I had easily a top 5 shot, and most definitely a top 10. And I have seen it happen to many others too, Swiss is just the latest victim. Did I mention his entry was a definite Top 10 shot this comp??
So what, never bring it up?? So, forget about all the new faces in these comps over the last month or so?? Not everyone who comes around here, checks out every single thread, some can easily fall through the cracks. It is about time to re-address this issue!
A good host, keeps people coming back to their comps, and gives EVERYONE a chance to win. And that is regardless of how good or bad a shot is, 0 votes in a poll is better than not being in the poll at all.
Reasonable Rule? Is it really?? I would much rather have a poll with 30 cool shots to vote for, than 10!! That sounds more like a host tring to be lazy about copy & pasting a poll, and not wanting to do a tie breaker poll too.
There are ways to keep the polls to a minimum, I am trying to experiment on the best poll system through our Scenery Competition. I figure that because of it's specificity the Scenery Comp, it will die out soon, so it makes a great testing grounds (thanks jgda9rs) for finding what works in these comps.
Art can be subjective, which is why 1 person should not decide who goes in the polls. Actually there are technical aspects of Art, Graphics, and Photography that makes one artwork better than another, but I have noticed that doesn't really apply around here with most of the voters.
Your shot was one of three that I figured should have been in the poll too. It had excellent Eye Movement, pretty good Color Balance, a very nice Background, and good lighting. The only thing I didn't like about it was, the Focal Point is the Lamp Post, and not the Car.
"http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/7230/img0027tp8.jpgAny tips on why it didn't get in? I need some help here.
That’s the spirit, never give up, if you are not in the top 10, that means you have to do it better next time. I didn’t get upset when I got left out of the PMC last week poll, even though redhawk mentioned (2 times actually) that was a good and cool shot.
Another reason why I kept the top 10 in this competition, was because I didn’t want to change the format of the competition. I am not the original host of it, I didn’t invented the rules, so I didn’t feel the right to change them. The top 10 worked through 13x weeks.
I think some rules should be changed, but maybe we (competition hosts) should have a private discussion about some of the rules of the competitions (mainly the PMC and the 2.0).
I also submitted an entry this last week that I thought was pretty mediocre. I didn't make it to the top 10, but I'll try again this week. For those saying that it's not fair, it very well may not be, but such is life and sometimes you've got to roll with it and try harder. Best of luck to everyone in this and future polls.
To answer some UEC stuff that was posted here...
Well you were not quite clear whether you actually thought the shot was edited. I did take a look though and could not see anything wrong in the shot. Perhaps would have been better to PM me about it if you felt something was wrong. Still, I do think the shot was ok.
That would piss off so many people. Imagine putting a lot of time into your photo to find out that so other guy undercut you for the final entry spot, wouldn't you bee pissed off?Competitions using a first-come, first-serve rationale would have avoided this furore over exclusion altogether.
Competitions using a first-come, first-serve rationale would have avoided this furore over exclusion altogether.