- 1,917
- Binance:TSIDDLSA
- patriotzero
- please no
REal LIFE SUZUKA vs.GT5 SUZUKA
- Thread starter patriotzero
- 19 comments
- 2,313 views
- 2,248
- dunedin NZ
- Godzilla_GTR
- Godzilla_GTR
i cant get it to work???
- 1,238
- RocketPunch1221
- RRoD? no thanks.
Not true comparison. Some of the location are messed up.
2nd row: Left (before chicane) =/= Right (at main straight)
6th row: Left (last left hander of zig zag) =/= Right (its the right hander after hairpin)
2nd row: Left (before chicane) =/= Right (at main straight)
6th row: Left (last left hander of zig zag) =/= Right (its the right hander after hairpin)
- 1,917
- Binance:TSIDDLSA
- patriotzero
- please no
LINK was Refreshed
- 2,248
- dunedin NZ
- Godzilla_GTR
- Godzilla_GTR
look's amazing, although the angles(of the camera, not the track) could've been a bit closer on some...
- 6
- United States
- PHIBALNATION
- olLANDSHARKlo
If you wanna compare real life to video games, try this. If I wreck in real life my car shows it, if I wreck in gt 5 I have no damage. Gt 5 needs to become a real sim.
- 4,004
- Croatia
Nobody now wants limited resources to be spent on such thing. After we sucessfuly got 3D spectators and 3D rims (let 3D rims never be forgotten as single greatest goal in history of racing-games development), we're aiming at weather effects now and changable day/night.
Damage in Gran Turismo is so 2003 issue.. This is 2007 man, wake up.
- 6,572
- Lincoln
- Speedster502
I can't even see the link...It says your bandwidth has expired or something like that.
- 7,588
- Whateversville
- Flerbizky
- 6,572
- Lincoln
- Speedster502
Ah...
The comparisons look good. Apart from the fact that the 2 image isn't comparing of the same straight...But PD have done a good job.
The comparisons look good. Apart from the fact that the 2 image isn't comparing of the same straight...But PD have done a good job.
- 2,344
- Bristol UK
- GTP_Chris
comparisons look good to me. The player of GT5 could have taken better angles as mentioned before but still, good job 
- 5,632
- Malaysia
- MuzaffarMusa
Well that is awesome! 
The shots looks quite nice, but maybe the comparison isn't that good, but who cares! But really, i hope PD had more time to update the circuits. The Suzuka circuit in GT doesn't have the skybox yet, while the Fuji circuit didn't have those power lines in the background (the first photo)
The shots looks quite nice, but maybe the comparison isn't that good, but who cares! But really, i hope PD had more time to update the circuits. The Suzuka circuit in GT doesn't have the skybox yet, while the Fuji circuit didn't have those power lines in the background (the first photo)
- 24,053
- It/It
- GTP_TheCracker
It just goes to show that PD do a pretty good job at it don't they.
Without being overly picky, the only thing that i can see that they consistantly get wrong is the height of items on the outside of the track. Trees and pylons all seem to be especially low, with pit buildings and grandstands also a little too short. Perhaps their widescreen settings distort and stretch the picture slightly giving the impression that things are not as tall as they should be?
Without being overly picky, the only thing that i can see that they consistantly get wrong is the height of items on the outside of the track. Trees and pylons all seem to be especially low, with pit buildings and grandstands also a little too short. Perhaps their widescreen settings distort and stretch the picture slightly giving the impression that things are not as tall as they should be?
kekke2000
Premium
- 1,936
- Sweden
- kekke2000
Yepp you're right, check out the second from the bottom. The mast right forward seems much higher IRL than it does in GT5. But i do think it is a little picky to complain about that actually.
It's not architecture, it's a racing game.
Disagreed. Yes, weather effects are really important, but so is damage! I'd even say that from a simulator point of view, damage is more important.
Sure the sun always shines, but you'll never find a scenario where the car wont break if you bang it really hard on the wall.
Just because you couldn't solve it back then doesn't mean we shouldn't now.
Eventhough you probably werent quite as serious as my answer makes you out to be
kekke2000
Premium
- 1,936
- Sweden
- kekke2000
Disagreed. Yes, weather effects are really important, but so is damage! I'd even say that from a simulator point of view, damage is more important.
Sure the sun always shines, but you'll never find a scenario where the car wont break if you bang it really hard on the wall.
Just because you couldn't solve it back then doesn't mean we shouldn't now.
Eventhough you probably werent quite as serious as my answer makes you out to be
Wasnt there a rumor or something about GT5 having damage for racing cars?
It IS GT4 in HD.. the track model is exactly the same, it just got new textures.
Similar threads
