That's reviewers for you. It's why I don't really bother reading them, some have been proven to be susceptible to outside pressure.What i don't understand is there's so much contrast in the reviewers opinion about the physics (car feal). Some say the physics are the best part of the game and some say it's the worst part (wonky feeling and not constant).
Personally i think it's spot on with my TX wheel, the best rally physics i've ever played on console.
That's reviewers for you. It's why I don't really bother reading them, some have been proven to be susceptible to outside pressure.
Just don't scroll through all the Citroens in the dealership or you'll quickly notice that there are radically differing 3D shapes between models that share a body shell. The Xsara Kit Car for example is cartoony compared to the Xsara WRCs. The Saxos also have 2 differing shapes even though they should all be the same. The greenhouse (roof/pillars/windows) gives it away--should be the same on all versions.
They are not supposed to be the same. The Xsara kit car is model year 2000 and the Xsara Rally cars are 2002 thru 2006 model years, the Saxos kit car is also a different year than the VTS S1600.
The basic shapes didn't change between years. Milestone was just lazy with the modeling consistency.
So got the game on ps4...will be using a T300...Any suggestions on ffb settings? I played the demo with T300 but ffb felt way to strong...
For me the most trustful reviewers are TeamVVV and InsideSimRacing.And racing games is one of the genres where I'm rarely inclined to put any stock at all in mainstream reviews, unless it's obvious that it was written by a racing game fan with lots of experience with both sims and arcade racers.
When most reviews of racing games don't even bother to mention whether the reviewer was using a controller or a wheel it's pretty hard to take them seriously, even in cases where they may actually be fairly on point.
These are the real life photos from the game, these are the same cars modeled in the game. The Saxo and Xsara Kit cars have different body styles from the Saxo VTS and Xsara Rally cars.
I'm not talking about fenders, flares, spoilers, anything below the beltline. I mean doors, roof and windows which were identical across all specifications. The Xsara Kit Car in-game looks like it has a chopped top like a hot rod compared to the Xsara WRC. The side windows on the 2 Saxo specifications in-game are different shapes and sizes, whereas in reality, the parts were identical.
Shots added. The difference in rooflines between the two Xsaras is quite apparent:
Because it did.... it was a different shape entirely...
Take it the Impreza 2008 and 2003 are wrong by your reasoning as well?I give up.
I give up.
I'm not talking about fenders, flares, spoilers, anything below the beltline. I mean doors, roof and windows which were identical across all specifications. The Xsara Kit Car in-game looks like it has a chopped top like a hot rod compared to the Xsara WRC. The side windows on the 2 Saxo specifications in-game are different shapes and sizes, whereas in reality, the parts were identical.
Shots added. The difference in rooflines between the two Xsaras is quite apparent:
I see what you mean, if they are supposed to be based on the same car, the windows and roof are totally different. Wonder if the two older models carried over from a previous Milestone game.
Edit, just looked at the Fiesta's the R2, R5 and Rally have very different window dimensions also.