Sony sued over Blu-ray

  • Thread starter Pebb
  • 4 comments
  • 451 views
16,736
England
Southampton, UK
Pebb--
Pebb
Since Blu-Ray is related to movies mainly, I thought this forum would be ok for this piece of news.

Source: GameSpot

Given its global position as an electronics giant, Sony is quite familiar with patent law. The company is also quite familiar with the potential penalties for running afoul of patent law, as evidenced by the $97 million in damages and interest it had to pay Immersion Corporation in a dispute over the rumble functions in Dual Shock controllers.

While the two companies have since patched things up, Sony opted to leave rumble by the wayside when it was designing the PlayStation 3's motion-sensing Sixaxis controller. The electronics giant couldn't avoid patent headaches entirely, however, as Irvine, California-based Target Technology Company filed suit earlier this month, seeking damages for alleged patent violations relating to the Blu-ray technology used in the system.

The suit, which names Sony Computer Entertainment America, Sony Pictures, and Sony DADC, claims that products marketed under the Blu-ray name infringe on a patent it owns for reflective layer materials in optical discs. The patent addresses what Target called a need for specific types of silver-based alloys with the advantages (but not the price) of gold. According to the patent, the alloys are also more resistant to corrosion than pure silver.

Target does not specify in its suit whether it believes all of Sony's Blu-ray discs infringe on its patent, or the suit applies to just a portion of the discs manufactured. The patent was filed in April of 2004 and granted in March of 2006.

Target is seeking a permanent injunction preventing Sony from violating its patent rights in the future, as well as damages with interest, multiplied due to what it characterizes as deliberate and willful infringement.

Sony representatives declined to comment, while Target's attorneys had not returned GameSpot's requests for comment as of press time.
 
Ridiculous... Simply put...

If you invent something - build it... If not. Shut the hell up...
 
infringe on a patent it owns for reflective layer materials in optical discs. The patent addresses what Target called a need for specific types of silver-based alloys with the advantages (but not the price) of gold. According to the patent, the alloys are also more resistant to corrosion than pure silver.
I'm not sure if the author of this article sucks, or the actual claim.

Does Target own the rights to mix this alloy? Or are they suing that it's patented to use this special alloy for this "reflective layer materials"?.

I need more input, but sounds pretty silly so far.
 
You'd have hoped that Sony would learn to cover their arses abit more often. Their legal team must be getting grilled by their marketing at the moment regardless of whether this case stands up in court or doesn't.
 
The main problem I see with this is that Sony are not 'Blu-ray', the are a part of the Blu-Ray Disc Association...

Wiki
The "Blu-ray Disc Association" was founded in 2002 by nine leading electronic companies: Matsu****a, Pioneer, Philips, Thomson, LG Electronics, Hitachi, Sharp, Samsung and Sony as contrast to the DVD Forum. Spearheaded by Sony Corporation on February 19th 2002 the companies announced [1] they were the "Founders" of the Blu-ray Disc and later changed their name to the "Blu-ray Disc Association" in order to achieve more companies joining their development. Some examples of companies that signed in include Apple, TDK, Dell, Hewlett Packard, The Walt Disney Company, Warner Bros. and Universal Music Group. At the moment there are more than 250 members and supporters of the Association.
Source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc_Association
Source - http://www.blu-raydisc.com/

Additionally if this is related to the manufacturer of discs (which is to a standard laid down by the whole association, not just Sony) then why does this action not name all of the owners of the manufacturing plants. If I recall correctly of the nine or so plants worldwide, Sony only own two or three of them, with Disney and other companies owning the rest.

So if this is a claim against the manufacturing process then all companies manufacturing Blu-ray discs will be in the line of fire (and that's a rather powerful group to take action against), and if the claim is against the use of the name Blu-Ray then the list of companies gets far, far larger.


Regards

Scaff
 
Back