Nice to see a Trump supporter being suitably sympathetic regarding the tragedy in Nice. I'm not sure what was politically correct about the French banning face coverings and the wearing of religious symbols in public but hey.
Meaning a bonanza for those who like to complain about political correctness, then. It's win-win for those people in this case.Burqas are a politically-correct bonanza. You can be PC and support them OR be PC and against them. If you're supporting them, you fall into the pro-Islam PC camp. If you're against them you fall into the pro-woman PC camp. Covered either way (ironically).
Meaning a bonanza for those who like to complain about political correctness, then. It's win-win for those people in this case.
Yes blame the Dutch Trumpist! BOOOOOOOOWhat an idiotic cartoon. Political correctness has nothing to do with it. The French have been pretty staunchly against organized religion ever since the revolution. The problems the French are facing have more to do with the aftermath of colonialism than "political correctness", but I wouldn't expect an ignorant Trumpist , whose trademark quality is arrogant ignorance, to have any awareness of that.
Nice to see a Trump supporter being suitably sympathetic regarding the tragedy in Nice. I'm not sure what was politically correct about the French banning face coverings and the wearing of religious symbols in public but hey.
What an idiotic cartoon. Political correctness has nothing to do with it. The French have been pretty staunchly against organized religion ever since the revolution. The problems the French are facing have more to do with the aftermath of colonialism than "political correctness", but I wouldn't expect an ignorant Trumpist , whose trademark quality is arrogant ignorance, to have any awareness of that.
Yes blame the Dutch Trumpist! BOOOOOOOO
What the cartoon is saying is that politicians and the media in France, like most other western nations, are currently hesitant to call the problem of radical Islamists for what it is. Instead stating it must be the act of one sick individual and the religion has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Hence "political correctness".
Not you. The cartoonist.Something seems to be a bit off here.
Who thinks that I am a Trump supporter?
Something seems to be a bit off here.
Who thinks that I am a Trump supporter?
Yes blame the Dutch Trumpist! BOOOOOOOO
What the cartoon is saying is that politicians and the media in France, like most other western nations, are currently hesitant to call the problem of radical Islamists for what it is. Instead stating it must be the act of one sick individual and the religion has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Hence "political correctness".
Not you. The cartoonist.
Me because I want to believe for the laughs despite the evidence against it.Who thinks that I am a Trump supporter?
I fear your windows might not survive due to the 'hateful leftists'Still buying that Trump bumbersticker for the pickup if he's the President.
Not you. The cartoonist.
Using "politically incorrect" language isn't going to solve any of these serious, complex problems, it may, on the other hand, alienate people whose help you need to tackle them.
When wasn't he in the clear? It looks like you misread my and @Biggles's posts when you talked about "blaming the Dutch Trumpist".Ok well it seems @Dennisch is in the clear now
If the cartoon was being bashed it wasn't specifically because of the cartoonist's political leanings but on his blaming the tragedy on something not all of us are convinced was responsible.I do think the cartoon makes sense as it is indeed a current phenomenon, especially in the EU. That the cartoonist is a Trump supporter isn't relevant to the theme, so i don't think the cartoon specifically deserves the bashing.
Not that I agree with it, it's too broad a statement, but it's an interesting supposition.
Sadly for that commenter this particular story doesn't seem to be quite true, so their point is a bit moot................
SnopesTo put things in perspective, the Los Angeles Times pointed out in a 7 September 2016 report that themed housing focused on cultural identity is hardly a new phenomenon on college campuses.Stanford, Wesleyan and Cornell are among prestigious, long-standing universities that host living quarters for students based on heritage or specific interests, including Native American, Latino, European, Jewish and African diaspora students. The housing type is by no means new or specific to California State University at Los Angeles, nor does offering themed housing mean a campus is enforcing racial segregation.
The university creates black-centric housing and you think that point is moot?