I wont visit this thread anymore... so much editing everywhere that even a PS1 game would look realistic... nonsense...
I wont visit this thread anymore... so much editing everywhere that even a PS1 game would look realistic... nonsense...
I wont visit this thread anymore... so much editing everywhere that even a PS1 game would look realistic... nonsense...
I wont visit this thread anymore... so much editing everywhere that even a PS1 game would look realistic... nonsense...
It´s not about the photos up there in this page... its generally...
Sometimes less is more...
It´s not about the photos up there in this page... its generally...
Sometimes less is more...
matt-mtbAs FishyJuice said, 9/10 editing a picture makes it better. In a stock GT5 picture, the colours seem a bit washed away. With editing you add more contrast.
Many times yes, but, most are due to overexposure in the first place.
However the single most destructive (and very often used) thing to do to a GT5 pic is add saturation.
What looks good on an average LCD most often looks horrible on a CRT, a better LCD, or print. Even worse on an OLED...
lancia delta hfYou're right, i often check my edited photos on a crt because i know it will show if it has too much saturation which has happend with a few pics that looked ok on my laptop
![]()
I know it doesn't look very realistic, but I hope you like it