War of the worlds

  • Thread starter Slick Rick
  • 89 comments
  • 3,471 views
3,534
United Kingdom
London
Just back from seeing war of the worlds.


I thought it started off nicely and the visuals were very nice and realistic but the ending i think totaly ruined the movie. I dont want to ruin the movie for those of you who want to watch it so im not going to why i thought the ending was a flop.

I think Tom Cruise did a good job and the suspension and horror in the movie was very good though and had good impact.


Stephen spielberg i think is loosing his touch in movies because i watched another recent movie of his called 'The Terminal' which i think lacked in places which i think a good director could of sorted.


I think War of the worlds is a good movie BUT before the end you must get up and leave or else you will ruin the movie for yourself.

I'd give it an 7/10
 
I didn't think the ending was terrible, but it was definitely anti-climactic.

There were a few inconsistencies that kind of stood out – for example, when the power was fully out (including battery-powered objects), why did that one man have a DV camcorder running? And how come the blood veins that were creeping all over the place had solid blood in them – that defeats the entire purpose of blood!

And the Robby "I-have-to-see-this" thing was a bit stupid – seems like a cheap way to make the script simpler throughout the rest of the movie.

Overall though, it was good. Excellent acting (especially when you consider all the CG effects), okay plot, and very realist effects. 👍 from me.
 
Yeah the ending definitely raised a big question mark. It seemed like the movie was going great but then cut short.

I don't think those root things had anything to do with blood. I think the aliens were using them to suck nutrients out of the earth, because when they saw them on the statue, they had dried up. No nutrients in concrete.

Oh yeah, anyone else puzzled on how that Robby kid lived? Did anyone else see the wall of fire that came out over the hill? Yet another "it just happened" moment.

Good movie though. I wouldn't reccomend going out of your way to see it, but it's not so bad.
 
My brother went to see this one, but he said it was just OK. One of my buddies said it wasn't that great. So far, pretty consistent with you guys' feedback. :)
 
I've read the book and I really enjoyed it, but I'm wondering if the ending is the same. Where the aliens die from bacteria or something because they don't have immune systems.
 
the_undertaker89,
Exactly, think of the movie "Finding Nemo" when the clown fish constantly befriend the sea anemone so it will; sting other fish and not them because they are immune. Very much like the movie W.O.T.W, only metaphorically speaking of course. I think endiong was too short cutted, almost as short as that movie "Day After Tomorrow." I expected a slower finish, or maybe I just enjoyed the issue Tom Cruise was facing at hand ;)
 
I saw it tonight and I thought it was a good movie. I also thought that the ending mad the movie seem to be cut short.
 
It felt like they ran out of money halfway through, and at that point realised they were also short on film, so they just hurried everything up, and to hell with it.

SPOILER






We don't really know what caused the loss of "shielding", so to speak, on the alien ships, for instance, and that's one of the things that annoyed me the most from this movie. It's not mentioned or hinted at any time that they do not have an immune system. That minivan never seemed to run out of gas, either. Why were the beams moving around so quickly, and then, once face to face with Dakota Fanning, just stares at her? I would have loved to see how the kid got through it, too.


At times it was eeriely reminescent of Jurassic Park, unsuprisingly another Spielberg flick. The old man's lost touch, it seems. I didn't like it, but I didn't hate it either. Not really worthy of all the hype it got, IMO. The CGI effects were pretty good, I have to say. At times it looked pretty real, and even managed to fool me once or twice. Cruise's role was believable, but someone please, please shoot Dakota Fanning to death or something.
 
The Freakin Hill was in balls of flames and somehow that idiot son STILL survived!
What kind of sh** was that?
Also when Tom Cruise blew up that tripod thingy with the grenades, there were 2 other machines there, didnt they notice that one of their machines just got destroyed? I mean their intulect is meant to be far superior to ours, whats up with that?
This movie i think was not very thought out.


I talked to my friend and he said it was based on a story written by H.G.Wells. A writer known for crappy endings if any of you have read the Red Room.

But ill say it again, Tom Cruise did a good job and the visuals were very nice.

Sage
I didn't think the ending was terrible, but it was definitely anti-climactic.

That was the word i wanted to use!! but my mind was blank at the time so i put terrible. Like one of those days you forget to spell 'thier' properly (or is it just me?)


Also was Rays ex wife the Girl from LOTR. The King of Rohans daughter?

EDIT: And that stupid girl...........i bet the auditions for the daughter was who could scream the most without loosing their voice!!
 
yeah i saw the movie on wednesday, and then ending wasn't that great if you're not high in intellect you wouldn't have figured out what killed the aliens. :dunce:, like my friend , and on the other hand dakota fanning got so annoying i found myself strangling an invisble neck during the movie specially when she started screaming in the van.
 
I saw it yesterday as well, and went in not expecting to like it too much. This is because I absolutely cannot stand Dakota Fanning, and I have also become fairly fed up with hearing about Tom Cruise in the news lately; I mean, it's worse than Bennifer for crying out loud!

Anyway, as I watched the movie I found myself filled with an overwhelming sense of dread as I watched the end of the world taking place. I hated the merciless aliens and felt Cruise's character's fear as he ran from the rising tripod as it rose from underground.

I didn't like the son either, and for some reason the "divorced dad connects with his kids through an incredibly traumatic experience" plot seems extremely predictable and old. I was actually hoping the son would die and was happy when he stupidly ran off to witness the almighty U.S. Army getting its ass kicked.

And the end was absolutely the stupidest part of the whole movie. I understand the original story was written a long time ago and the ending may have seemed more plausible back then, but this is the 21st century! Am I actually expected to believe that aliens intelligent enough to build war machines with impenetrable force fields around them, bury them underground hundreds or thousands of years ago on Earth, travel through space and invade on bolts of lightning are going to be stupid enough to overlook the possibility that there may be viruses and bacteria they're not immune to on the planet they've "watched with envious eyes" for so long?

Let me pose the question this way: If humans were able to travel to another planet with life on it, don't you think we'd examine the air and wear protective suits and study the entire atmosphere first? Or would we go down and root around in people's bomb-shelter basements, eating their food and drinking their water? There hasn't been a more moronic defeat of supposedly all-powerful aliens since the infamous Apple computer took out an entire species' technology in Independence Day.

Overall, watch it for the destruction and the special effects. And Tom Cruise actually does a good job as an actor and is able to carry the film pretty well. But if you're like me and hate watching little Miss Fanning play a 9-year-old kid who somehow has the knowledge to give advice to her dad about "getting through" to his teenage son, you're going to want to smack her by the end of this film.

I give it a 7/10.
 
yeah i hae to agree with ya in the ending, also the stupid son who was son aanxious(sp?)) to see the U.S. army get owned, kinda obvious even from the begining of the movie there was gonna be some massive ownnage of our human troops.
 
The ending was a big anti-climax really, but, to be honest how else could they have ended it?? Independence day style, with a huge plane-gun fight?

Either way, i thought this was excellent. I never feel tension/suspense in a film but this did quite get me. I also think the alien thingy's really were quite scary with that eary noise they made.

Oh and yes the son was abit of an idiot.
 
I was shocked when I saw the ending, not because of how the aliens died, but because of how badly it was done and also because his son had survived. I thought it was badly paced, well acted but too flawed to be billed as anything more than a fairly decent rent it once movie if you missed it at the pics. I did like how merciless the aliens were, the way they struck fear into the people on screen was convincing too, I also liked the bit where Tom Cruise killed Tim Robbins and he blindfolded Fanning and made her sing to herself while he did it. I enjoyed the acting, the wrong pace was used in several parts and the directing was a big disapointment.
 
It was really great! I read the book like 2 or 3 years ago. I didn't see anything really wrong with it. I loved how they got the alien ships to look like the illustrations in the book.
 
I give it a 5 on the "1 to eh" scale.

The ****ing daughter was awful. Easily the most obnoxious character since Jar Jar Binks. I would have paid an extra 8 bucks at the theater to see a version sans that little *****.

"WAAAH, my back hurts. I can't sleep down here in the basement, even though the human population is on the brink of extinction."
"I wanna see my mommy!"

Piss off, you midget, before I stuff some hummus down your throat.

The ending was boring, the plot was boring, Tom Cruise was OK, the daughter sucked, but the movie was OK. If that makes any sense.
 
Klostrophobic
I give it a 5 on the "1 to eh" scale.

The ****ing daughter was awful. Easily the most obnoxious character since Jar Jar Binks. I would have paid an extra 8 bucks at the theater to see a version sans that little *****.

"WAAAH, my back hurts. I can't sleep down here in the basement, even though the human population is on the brink of extinction."
"I wanna see my mommy!"

Piss off, you midget, before I stuff some hummus down your throat.

The ending was boring, the plot was boring, Tom Cruise was OK, the daughter sucked, but the movie was OK. If that makes any sense.

Man i thought i was the only one.

"Oh, but she's such a great actress"

Just how hard is it to act like a freaking leech?
 
That movie made me wish I had a grilfriend soooo bad.
Spoiler
For a start what sage said was true, why was the DV cam working?
But the whole 'I'm the only one not getting killed' happening twice! That was just rediculous.

The daughter while partly entertaining was annoying to say the least. Claustrophobia, nut alergy, bad back, lullabies....Does this kid get any more annoying!?

I'm happy it wasn't too predictable, there were a few times when you counted 1,2,3 and waited for teh explosion or the scream but it never came.

All in all a mixed reaction from my mates. Some loved it, some hated it. I personally didn't like it that much though appreciated it for the action, if not the surprises.
 
This thread is filled with spoilers, I don't think this counts though.

How come the news van was working?

Full of continuity but otherwise, I enjoyed it. Stick with the crowd and give it 7/10, I was expecting better. 👎
 
I agree with Slick Rick, how in the hell did the son survive that massive explosion? Not only that, but he beat his dad to his grandma's house! Slightly incredible if you ask me. As to the ending, I thought it was a clever way of how the aliens die instead of them being killed by water or latex or something. It did cut the movie short, that is true. Despite the above, I enjoyed it thoroughly.
7.9/10
 
we should write a letter to george lucas to NEVER EVER cast dakota fanning again as she is the most annoying little grl i've ever seen, and i have a little sister but shes not even half as bad as her.
 
When Wells wrote the book in 1898 I doubt he thought a film would be made of it. The novel really isn't a crash-and-bang sci-fi adventure, at least not in modern terms.
There are as many pages devoted to describing the Martians biology than to battles, though the chapter "Thunder Child" is pretty exhilerating. As for the ending Wells was interested in explaining to the reader scientific ideas at a time when most people simply did not know about bacteria, immune systems etc. For the time these were fairly new ideas. Remember this book is over a 100 years old!
I didn't have a chance to see the movie so I guess I'll wait for the DVD.
 
I didnt find Dakota Fanning annoying at all, although she did seem a tad thick at times. The son was much more irritating. Dakota is about the only watchable oyung actress that exists imo.
 
slackbladder
When Wells wrote the book in 1898 I doubt he thought a film would be made of it. The novel really isn't a crash-and-bang sci-fi adventure, at least not in modern terms.
There are as many pages devoted to describing the Martians biology than to battles, though the chapter "Thunder Child" is pretty exhilerating. As for the ending Wells was interested in explaining to the reader scientific ideas at a time when most people simply did not know about bacteria, immune systems etc. For the time these were fairly new ideas. Remember this book is over a 100 years old!
I didn't have a chance to see the movie so I guess I'll wait for the DVD.

If you're going to make an old book into a summer blockbuster movie, you're going to have to update it somewhat in order for audiences to buy it. If something's not believable in a movie, you can't simply say "Well, that's the way it was in the book."
 
Anderton Prime
If you're going to make an old book into a summer blockbuster movie, you're going to have to update it somewhat in order for audiences to buy it. If something's not believable in a movie, you can't simply say "Well, that's the way it was in the book."

I don't know if the movie is believable or not as I've yet to see it. But I do agree that the onus of the telling of the story, its believability or lack of lies with the filmakers, the screenwriter and Director etc.

As far as I can tell the film really isn't that similar to the book. But as is often the case just because it uses the same title does'nt mean it's telling the same story.
 
Just got back from seeing it now. I didn't find either of the kids annoying although the whole thing with the son escaping the ball of flame and then managing to beat his dad back did ruin it. Cut short? Absolutely, I think if they had put less time into the invasion (especially in the basement with Tim Robbins) there may have been a better finish.

I felt myself sitting there with a vague sense of the '....wtf?' going on. It felt to me like there was nothing very solid about the flow of the film.
 
I liked it, Tom Cruise is getting better as an actor, he's actually trying to play a character instead of just himself like in past movies. He was ok in The last Samurai as well, he's losing his youth, so he may as well learn to act to keep getting big roles.

The design of the aliens and the special effects were terrific, really top notch. Apart from those gonad baskets holding up all the people. That was daggy as crap. The noise the aliens made was VERY EERY! They got that just right. I'd have to listen again, but they do two notes, one after the other, a tritone I would think - known as the devil's interval! This interval was banned from use in much old music (middle ages etc) because it was waaay too scary and unpleasant! Think the first two notes from the simpsons, or the intro to purple haze by Hendrix, or the start of killing in the name by RATM. All uses the tritone to sound wierd.

I think the kids were SUPPOSED to be annoying and worry too much about trivial matters (Dakota Fanning) because they didn't initially understand the scale of the problem or what had happened. This helped create tension in the relationship and make Cruise have to take responsibility and try and be a good Dad. It makes sense that as the daughter realises the scale of the invasion, she becomes markedly less annoying. Her back problem wasn't too annoying for her when she was about to get killed. It totally works with the plot.

Speilburg also had some nice subtle satire thrown in:
Robbie: "Is it terrorism?"
Cruise: "No Robbie, its not terrorism..."
Robbie: "Where did they come from then? Europe?!"
Cruise: "NO ROBBIE! THEY'RE NOT FROM EUROPE!!"

I thought this was funny. :sly:

There are only two big problems I had with the movie. One is the continuity of how Robbie escaped that massive explosion and got to his Mum's house without a scratch (a little cheese is expected, it IS SPIELBURG!!), and the other is the credit the narrator gives GOD at the end, by mentioning God as if he had some grand plan to save all the humans (the aliens didn't have the right to live on Earth? God had only chosen humans as the top dogs?!).

It was VERY STRANGE TO MIX UP A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION TO WHY THEY (the aliens) DIED WITH A RELIGIOUS MESSAGE ALSO!!

I was totally fine with the ending otherwise, the bacteria/disease thing is a nice idea. Obviously you can't have some big fight and have Team America win, thats just pure cheese. Even though the aliens were so smart, and potentially could've worked out the bacteria thing, I don't think thats too bad an inconsistency. Its consistent with the book, and I can suspend my disbelief enough to enjoy it. It was possible they had bigger worries than wondering about little bacteria. They might've easily had a superiority complex with all those huge tripods and lasers and just assumed they would kick arse (which they did for a while). The sheilds going down without explanation was fine, the viewer should be wondering why the aliens are dying (as the humans in the film would be feeling - just an unsure kinda optimism happenin'..) until the bacteria/disease thing is explained perfectly well at the end. If you need more explanation, you just can't suspend your disbelief enough to enjoy a film, or you're just a dumbass.

Great film overall, I liked how crazy and realistic the humans behaved in that mob kinda mentality... I didn't expect Spielburg to portray the majority of humans soo darkly. I liked how the only song Ray knew to sing to Dakota was about a hot-rod. It was a very cheesy but ultimately touching scene where it really hits Ray just how crappy a Dad he's been so far. Yes, a cheesy plot, but the characters were so (erm.. human?) and realistically portrayed it overcomes the simplicity and inherent cheesyness of the storyline.

A great movie slightly dampened by the religious reference at the end, and Robbie not dying. I think if Robbie had died it would've made the movie much more powerful and strengthed the emotional complexity throughout the rest of the film, particularly at the end when delivering Dakota home. It would've been a strange, almost joyous, victorious defiance as well as a feeling of powerlessness and mortality, which would've made the ending much more interesting and involving instead of just cheese. I expected them to all go inside and eat apple pie and have cranberry ice-cream after the reunion.:sly:

Well, they are flaws an American film (particulary one by speilburg) is expected to have, and within these confines of film-making I thought it was a thoroughly impressive and entertaining (not to forget tense and suspenseful) movie.

8.9/10
 
Back