- 2,760
Here's a quote from an article from The Guardian which appeared in September 2004:
[font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]King attracted [criticism] last year when he was awarded the National Book Foundation annual medal for distinguished contribution to American letters. Harold Bloom called the decision "a terrible mistake", claiming that King was unfit to join such previous winners as Saul Bellow, Philip Roth, John Updike and Toni Morrison. In the Boston Globe, Bloom argued that the award was "another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life... He is an immensely inadequate writer on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis... By awarding it to King they recognise nothing but the commercial value of his books, which sell in the millions but do little more for humanity than keep the publishing world afloat." Bloom says that "the triumph of the genial King is a large emblem of the failures of American education".
[/font][font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif](You can read the entire article here.)
I want to put this question out there because I am a big fan of Mr. King and have read 95% of his work. While some of his books were not all that good, certain ones I thought were excellent, particularly The Stand, The Shining, Misery, and all seven books in The Dark Tower series. Do you believe he is a popular fiction writer at best, or does his body of work stand as an important contribution to literature? If you've only read one or two of his books, you probably aren't qualified to give an educated opinion, but I'd like to hear from you all the same.
By the way, I put this in the Rumble Strip because no one visits the Hobbies section except plastic car model kit builders and guys who are infatuated with airsoft...not that there's anything wrong with that. I know there's a "What book are you reading" thread started by Mike Rotch, but this didn't seem to fit in there.
[/font]
[font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]King attracted [criticism] last year when he was awarded the National Book Foundation annual medal for distinguished contribution to American letters. Harold Bloom called the decision "a terrible mistake", claiming that King was unfit to join such previous winners as Saul Bellow, Philip Roth, John Updike and Toni Morrison. In the Boston Globe, Bloom argued that the award was "another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life... He is an immensely inadequate writer on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis... By awarding it to King they recognise nothing but the commercial value of his books, which sell in the millions but do little more for humanity than keep the publishing world afloat." Bloom says that "the triumph of the genial King is a large emblem of the failures of American education".
[/font][font=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif](You can read the entire article here.)
I want to put this question out there because I am a big fan of Mr. King and have read 95% of his work. While some of his books were not all that good, certain ones I thought were excellent, particularly The Stand, The Shining, Misery, and all seven books in The Dark Tower series. Do you believe he is a popular fiction writer at best, or does his body of work stand as an important contribution to literature? If you've only read one or two of his books, you probably aren't qualified to give an educated opinion, but I'd like to hear from you all the same.
By the way, I put this in the Rumble Strip because no one visits the Hobbies section except plastic car model kit builders and guys who are infatuated with airsoft...not that there's anything wrong with that. I know there's a "What book are you reading" thread started by Mike Rotch, but this didn't seem to fit in there.
[/font]