Indianapolis GP(F1) circuit confirmed for GT5 demo!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTF nooooooooooooooooooooo....

Not sure what you're on about?

I'm surprised at how quickly the news spread from the little Aussie TORCtalk site to other sites, but I suppose that's what happens when you post that sort of stuff here on the biggest GT site. :)

Once again, all credit goes to Joe Racer from TORC talk. 👍 :cheers:
 
On top of this, i'd guess that 'thesixthaxis' saw MAD94D's post here, then viewed TORCTalk, then wrote the story, which was then posted here in a new thread. Clever 'superfast' stuff, this internet.
 
It's a disapointment that the track is not Spa but I'm glad it's finally been announced.

I can't wait to see some Screenshots and Videos of the car and track.
 
800px-Indianapolis_Motor_Speedway_-_road_course.svg.png


The track doesn't look too bad.
 
Would you guys believe me when I say the most intense race in online racing simulation I ever had was on Indianapolis? Not a bad track at all IMO.
 
Last edited:
Half the track is boring, from corner 11 to 1 (just an opinion)
Just like half of Daytona Road
 
Half the track is boring, from corner 11 to 1 (just an opinion)
Just like half of Daytona Road

This track is much much better than daytona road course!!!!! This track is one of my favorite in real F1 and game F1!!!!!:dunce:
 
I noticed the skid marks too. Shame about the track though. I was glad to see the back of it in F1 too.
 
I noticed the skid marks too. Shame about the track though. I was glad to see the back of it in F1 too.

I can almost guarantee those skid marks are always there. They look too good to be true. The guy only did 1 lap before the pic was taken, and I can see skid marks for multiple laps.
 
I can almost guarantee those skid marks are always there. They look too good to be true.

So does GT5 Prologue.

Show someone a replay of a black 430 flying through London and it takes most people a lap or two ti figure out it's not real (unless you crash, then the lack of fire makes it apparent)
 
The skidmarks look more darker than the ones you find in Eiger. But knowing PD, they might be false because those skidmarks were in the track when they took pictures of it.
 
Two threads with the same pictures, links and discusions?

This one gets locked.

The main thread can be found here.


Regards

Scaff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back