Are the Olympics getting too big for their boots? And how long before we reach a point where no cities step forward and bid for the games because it is too much of a hassle/expensive?
I realise that most Olympic games eventually turn a profit (ignore if you are reading from Montreal), and bring a load of money to the host city/country, but I think the heartaches eventually will outweigh those benefits.
Especially the Olympic rings over Tower bridge. That cost over £250,000! Anyway, I'm out of the country for all 4 weeks.The Olympics is a complete waste of money, and the only people who do well out of it are the corporate types and back scratching officials. I am glad I am out of the country for two weeks when it is on.
The Olympics is a complete waste of money, and the only people who do well out of it are the corporate types and back scratching officials. I am glad I am out of the country for two weeks when it is on.
Especially the Olympic rings over Tower bridge. That cost over £250,000! Anyway, I'm out of the country for all 4 weeks.
I'll make my first pick for Gold
Basketball- USA
Anyone else with possible Golds?
I dont think the financial return is that low in the short term, but it is really hard to quantify. What do you count? Of course there is the sponsorship and TV rights, but Im sure the IOC take a good amount of that. But increased turnover in shops/restaurants/hotels? Future events hosted at new venues?I don't think any city/area profits from the Olympic Games; you'll pull in a tenth of the expenditure on your returns, but it seems to be a great excuse to rebuild/expand physical infrastructure and improve employment figures in the immediate short-term. But I think the only medium-term gains are intangible, like putting your city "on the map" as a viable tourist destination, or as a potential business/industrial locale.
Agree completelyThe sponsorship thing has been so way out of control by restrictions, it's awful...It's been going on for years, and the IOC profits mightily from the lack of economic freedom to venue-goers (which I suppose is no different than the $8 light beers offered in stadia 'round the world).
You know they are televised worldwide right? You dont have to be in the UK to watch or follow the gamesI think there are more people leaving the country than there are staying for the Olympics. Thread will be dead.
Not if Australia can help it, but I think GB will dominateBritain - Cycling
Maybe, but it is only an under 23 tournament, so no-one caresBrazil - Football
Not if Australia can help itUSA - Swimming
YepJamaica - Mens 100m and 200m
Volleyball maybe, gymnastics - pedobear.jpgMen all across the world - Women's Volleyball and Gymnastics
You know they are televised worldwide right? You dont have to be in the UK to watch or follow the games
Maybe, but it is only an under 23 tournament, so no-one cares
Volleyball maybe, gymnastics - pedobear.jpg
Also, in some sweeping generalisations, black guys will win the long distance running, eastern European countries will win wrestling, East Asians will win table tennis and badminton. White people will win almost all of the swimming, with the odd Chinese athlete taking one.
Wait, they are over 18, right ?
I'll make my first pick for Gold
Basketball- USA
Anyone else with possible Golds?
I'm looking forward to the hurdles...
[Michelle Jenneke vid]
Unfortunately she wont be at the games.
Err, she was already at the games. The junior ones though.
She's 19...Re: Ages of olympians.
Max age for the Junior Olympics is 16. So get those impure thoughts of dancey hurdler out of your mind. Gymnastics runs the gamut as far as age goes. 14-20something.
WikipediaThe IAAF World Junior Championships in Athletics are the world championships for junior aged athletes (19 years old or younger on 31 December in the year of the competition)
Does anyone actually follow the competitors?