- 1,914
OK, let me explain the situation: the series i was running, the AE86 Tour of Asia, has lost people's interest. Now instead of feeling a fool by running a series with no-one turning up, I decided to (once again regretably) stop. But I have bounced back with a new suggestion which ties in with my rekindled liking for Group C sportscars
As the title states, this will be a challenge which takes us back to the 80 and early 90's, where Porsche, Jaguar, Lancia, Sauber-Mercedes, Nissan, Toyota and Peugeot were the order of the day in the World Sportscar Championship. The series will feature all 7 of the Group C cars which were included into GT4. To jog your memory, they are:
Jaguar XJR-9
Nissan R89C
Toyota 88C-V (Minolta)
Sauber Mercedes C9
Mazda 787B
Nissan R92CP
Peugeot 905
The series will visit a number of real-world tracks, including Laguna Seca, Fuji, Le Mans and the Nurburgring. Race lengths have been undecided yet, but they will be announced with the championsip schedule.
To find out the initial performance of the cars, I took each one around La Sarthe 2 to see how fast they were before modifications. The runs were done over 1 lap in Arcade Mode with no aids and R5 tyres. Here is what I found:
1st) Nissan R89C - 2'56.816
Comments: The car tops out at just about 230mph on Mulsanne, but it hovers around 225-230mph because of the bumpy nature. The grip on the rear is good, since there is no wheelspin in 2nd gear.
2nd) Toyota 88C-V - 2'57.848
Comments: One of two cars in the group with 6 gears. Even so, the car does still manage to touch 232-233mph on Mulsanne. Again, rear grip is good, but the wheels to lose traction in 2nd gear briefly, but not for much.
3rd) Nissan R92CP - 2'58.821
Comments: Even though it is said to have low downforce levels, suprisingly enough they showed more on the front than the rear, the rear wheels giving hardly any wheelspin in 2nd gear. Manages about the same as the 88C-V down Mulsanne
4th) Sauber-Mercedes C9 - 2'59.033
Comments: This car is fast, but it lacks in the handling department. Maybe taking some weight off may help. Again, not really any wheelspin in 2nd gear, so the car show good torque. Hits same speed as the other 3 cars.
5th) Jaguar XJR-9 - 3'03.509
Comments: Slow lap may have been due to the fact that this car has almost no traction in 2nd gear, which makes for a very tail-happy cat. With 5 gears, it can still hit 230mph. Choosers of this car better have their drifting skills on standby (if you know what i mean
)
6th) Mazda 787B - 3'03.733
Comments: Easily the best handling car out of the 7. Only hits 220mph on Mulsanne, but it makes up for it in cornering speeds. Rear grip is good, with some loss of traction in 2nd gear. Does need a power upgrade, though.
7th) Peugeot 905 - 3'08.833
Comments: My favourite car out of the lot, but unfortunately the one which produces the slowest time. Even though with 6 gears, it can only touch about 225mph. One losing factor could be the fact that it takes a century for this car to change gear. This car definately needs to lose weight and gain power. Only a tiny loss of traction in 2nd gear gives it good rear end stability.
So, from this we can estimate the following: A sensible lap time target for all these cars would be 3'00. The Peugeot needs drastic upgrades to stay with the rest, while the Mazda does need some more power to gain those 3 seconds. The Jaguar may not need anything, but it could struggle due to lack of rear end traction with no aids. On the other end of the scale, the two Nissans and the Minolta need more weight and a little less power to keep them on par with everyone else. The Sauber may need some weight taken off, but it does also need some power subtracted.
If anyone would like to help me find the Arcade settings we need, or if they have any questions, queries, pointers or helpful suggestions, please feel free to either PM me or post them here.
As the title states, this will be a challenge which takes us back to the 80 and early 90's, where Porsche, Jaguar, Lancia, Sauber-Mercedes, Nissan, Toyota and Peugeot were the order of the day in the World Sportscar Championship. The series will feature all 7 of the Group C cars which were included into GT4. To jog your memory, they are:
Jaguar XJR-9
Nissan R89C
Toyota 88C-V (Minolta)
Sauber Mercedes C9
Mazda 787B
Nissan R92CP
Peugeot 905
The series will visit a number of real-world tracks, including Laguna Seca, Fuji, Le Mans and the Nurburgring. Race lengths have been undecided yet, but they will be announced with the championsip schedule.
To find out the initial performance of the cars, I took each one around La Sarthe 2 to see how fast they were before modifications. The runs were done over 1 lap in Arcade Mode with no aids and R5 tyres. Here is what I found:
1st) Nissan R89C - 2'56.816
Comments: The car tops out at just about 230mph on Mulsanne, but it hovers around 225-230mph because of the bumpy nature. The grip on the rear is good, since there is no wheelspin in 2nd gear.
2nd) Toyota 88C-V - 2'57.848
Comments: One of two cars in the group with 6 gears. Even so, the car does still manage to touch 232-233mph on Mulsanne. Again, rear grip is good, but the wheels to lose traction in 2nd gear briefly, but not for much.
3rd) Nissan R92CP - 2'58.821
Comments: Even though it is said to have low downforce levels, suprisingly enough they showed more on the front than the rear, the rear wheels giving hardly any wheelspin in 2nd gear. Manages about the same as the 88C-V down Mulsanne
4th) Sauber-Mercedes C9 - 2'59.033
Comments: This car is fast, but it lacks in the handling department. Maybe taking some weight off may help. Again, not really any wheelspin in 2nd gear, so the car show good torque. Hits same speed as the other 3 cars.
5th) Jaguar XJR-9 - 3'03.509
Comments: Slow lap may have been due to the fact that this car has almost no traction in 2nd gear, which makes for a very tail-happy cat. With 5 gears, it can still hit 230mph. Choosers of this car better have their drifting skills on standby (if you know what i mean
6th) Mazda 787B - 3'03.733
Comments: Easily the best handling car out of the 7. Only hits 220mph on Mulsanne, but it makes up for it in cornering speeds. Rear grip is good, with some loss of traction in 2nd gear. Does need a power upgrade, though.
7th) Peugeot 905 - 3'08.833
Comments: My favourite car out of the lot, but unfortunately the one which produces the slowest time. Even though with 6 gears, it can only touch about 225mph. One losing factor could be the fact that it takes a century for this car to change gear. This car definately needs to lose weight and gain power. Only a tiny loss of traction in 2nd gear gives it good rear end stability.
So, from this we can estimate the following: A sensible lap time target for all these cars would be 3'00. The Peugeot needs drastic upgrades to stay with the rest, while the Mazda does need some more power to gain those 3 seconds. The Jaguar may not need anything, but it could struggle due to lack of rear end traction with no aids. On the other end of the scale, the two Nissans and the Minolta need more weight and a little less power to keep them on par with everyone else. The Sauber may need some weight taken off, but it does also need some power subtracted.
If anyone would like to help me find the Arcade settings we need, or if they have any questions, queries, pointers or helpful suggestions, please feel free to either PM me or post them here.