The only thing about doing more laps is that people will catch each other and/or start working with each other. If I had one lap I wouldn't take the risk of possibly getting slowed by the person I'm trying to draft but if I have a few I'll take the risk because I can go again. Also if someone wants to team up with me it gives me a chance to work with them and vice versa if there's multiple laps.
On trying to police people getting an advantage from the draft I think that will be next to impossible to do fairly. What if I'm on my hot lap and the guy ahead of me spins out or I just catch him because I'm faster and I get a draft off of him. Am I cheating if I finish the lap in his draft? The point I'm making is I think either make it 1 lap qualy or just let it be. There's no unfair advantage from having the draft because anyone can use it. It's not like you get the draft and I don't. Yea sometimes you will get out qualified by someone who's lucky but I'll bet that the results of qualifying will be pretty much the same because the faster drivers will figure out how to use it to their advantage.
Allowing drivers use each other to improve their qualifying times will add more drama than simply disallowing would cause. Sure, there might be situations when it's difficult to police fairly, but that doesn't mean we should encourage it (which is basically what we would be doing by allowing it).
Let's run one Sunday the old way, with draft, and see how it works out. We can argue about level of draft real life vs gt5 but it is there. I think it makes qualifying that much more interesting and strategic, while shaking things up a bit. If free run draft had been there since day 1 we would argue if it were to be removed.
Anything else just complicates q time and the juice might not be worth the squeeze.
Qualifying the "old way" is fine by me, as long as everyone follows the rules. Anyone who's raced in the same division as me on any Sunday night knows the level of emphasis I put on spacing out on the track during qualifying - and that was even before draft was a factor. Now that PD has given us this new "gift" to deal with, it's just that much more important to give each other space on the track.
In other words, give ample room to the driver in front of you
during your out lap - don't wait till the last corner to slow down because you'll end up with someone right on your own butt. If you start your hot lap two second behind another driver and you close the gap on him and end up in his draft, that's on
you for not giving him enough space. However, if you start ten seconds behind a driver, but he wrecks and you end up in his draft because of it, that on
him and he needs to pull over and wait for an opening where he can continue qualifying without any cars nearby.
Bottom line is that qualifying shouldn't look any different than it is supposed to have looked all along in S.N.A.I.L. - everyone giving each other ample space on the track and drivers pulling off the track if they end up in front of another driver due to their own mistake.
What about the guys who will not come off of the track, or listen to directions during qualifying?
This is not 1-2 drivers, btw.
This would not be an issue if we allow the full ten minutes for all drivers. However, if we did split it up into two sessions we could simply disqualify those that don't listen. If drivers think it's okay to be oblivious to the rules that we have in place or not listen to what is being said in the lounge, then they should be punished.
Simply put, drivers who drive more laps than their 5-minute session allows, would need to exit the track and start at the back of the grid. If they ask "why do I have to leave, I didn't do anything wrong", just explain until they understand and don't start the race until they leave the track.