- 28,470
- Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- Johnnypenso
Thanks for the response:tup:I did receive a PM. I'm not in on any kind of joke.
I suspected but wasn't 100% sure. I wanted to point out out some inconsistencies to be able to say "haha, good joke", but those inconsistencies could have been just that. Inconsistencies.How did I miss @prisonermonkeys pulling a Trump? I almost have a politics degree and I missed that? I am deeply ashamed.
Like legitimately that is my biggest issue here. That I didn't see it.
You're free to believe that if you wish - but like I said, how do we know that you're not trying to explain it away because you don't want to admit you fell for it?Didnt think he'd pull something so childish, the "I was just pretending to be silly all along!" card,
I fell for it, and really, the "falling for it" seemed almost universal.You're free to believe that if you wish - but like I said, how do we know that you're not trying to explain it away because you don't want to admit you fell for it?
As has been said, people would only fall for it because outlandish opinions are not so outlandish when coming from you. And that honestly says a lot more about you than it could ever about me or anyone.You're free to believe that if you wish - but like I said, how do we know that you're not trying to explain it away because you don't want to admit you fell for it?
and that's all that he wantedyou didn't really gain anything from this, apart from votes
and that's all that he wanted
Personally thought @prisonermonkeys was taking the piss, his first post on here gave it away. Impressed though given how long he has been a member here, he could pull off such a view.
That has actually happened, but it was the result of a much darker scenario.Otherwise April Fools will probably have a big chunk of membership banned under the Rules, if people decide to be creative.
At the end of the day, only way to pull it off is to keep same posting style and try and make it somewhat believable. First and subsequent posts gave it away as he has been a previous award winner, a member long enough to take part in all DQuaN GTP award threads and has made comment such as following in one.All it really indicates is his facade is indistinguishable from how nearly everyone actually perceives him, assuming that was his intent from the start. Which I'm still not convinced is the case. Either way, he "lost" this one.
Yeah, I'd like to know who didn't vote for me in the quote of the year category. I'm polishing my good banhammer as we speak.
The Sun really did come down hard that dayThat has actually happened, but it was the result of a much darker scenario.
Not sure if that means the same thing here as it does over 'ome, but the thought has also crossed my mind....more than once actually....Personally thought @prisonermonkeys was taking the piss, his first post on here gave it away. Impressed though given how long he has been a member here, he could pull off such a view.
Where am I on the list?
Anyway, I wouldn't win this but I would win the 'User who's made the most pointless and/or locked threads?' award.
Wow, its amazing the lengths some people will go to just to get some attention. What a childish act this was just to win an internet forum award. What a sad life you must have.
When you post something like that without referring to a particular previous post or member, my default is to assume that it's aimed at the post above. I guess it's clear enough who you're talking about here, but it's safer to link or quote.
I think @prisonermonkeys was just getting carried away having a good time. That's probably not a strong enough opinion to win this for me. I still blame Russia.
Then you should have won it, because you always change your mind. I have never encountered someone so fluid in their opinions before as you. Of course, you only ever do it for the sake of attacking someone, even if it means completely contradictory statements. So I guess that means that you have no principles at all, and only value getting a few quick jabs in during a discussion.I'm choosing based on which person I believe is most open to changing their mind on a held view.
Then you should have won it, because you always change your mind. I have never encountered someone so fluid in their opinions before as you. Of course, you only ever do it for the sake of attacking someone, even if it means completely contradictory statements. So I guess that means that you have no principles at all, and only value getting a few quick jabs in during a discussion.
Something you have stated repeatedly without ever having offered up an actual example of it.Then you should have won it, because you always change your mind. I have never encountered someone so fluid in their opinions before as you. Of course, you only ever do it for the sake of attacking someone, even if it means completely contradictory statements. So I guess that means that you have no principles at all, and only value getting a few quick jabs in during a discussion.
Then you should have won it, because you always change your mind. I have never encountered someone so fluid in their opinions before as you. Of course, you only ever do it for the sake of attacking someone, even if it means completely contradictory statements. So I guess that means that you have no principles at all, and only value getting a few quick jabs in during a discussion.