I can see Aston, Chevy and Porsche protesting the BoP stuff the ACO has been pulling, but Ferrari? I know, I know, not the marque to be used to have rules stacked against it, but they were obviously capable of delivering a competitive performance.Don't worry Ferrari and Aston have protested Ford as they got within 7% of the LMP2's so have had their trophies taken off them for now.
Super classy from Porsche on Twitter.
To be honest: I don't want manufacturers like Toyota or Audi to win LM. Manufacturers of family cars should not participate in racing at all. Unfortunately they (still) do and have far more money than the private teams. I can't think of a single reason why someone interested in motorsports becomes a fan of Toyota.
That is one of the best posts in a long time. I love the brutal honesty.fun fact: I never rooted for Toyota and not really going to as I'm somewhat biased against Asian car manufacturers for no rational reason
Haven't seen any hostility from Toyota towards Porsche, either.I'm sure Porsche respected the fact at the end, that Toyota was going to win after a hard fought battle to bring Japan its 2nd Le Mans Championship. It's just "was" & "did" ended up being 2 different outcomes.
Don't they have one already?Now, we wait for Ford to make some kind of documentary on their road to success at Le Mans......
They had a maximum of six minutes to complete the final lap? What the hell? Why?
I read once on the internet that it's a rule that was set in place because Chevrolet, way back in time, used to build up a huge lead and then just park in the pits until they could just roll out and finish. Whether that's true or not, I don't know.
That can't be it because you still can do exactly that. What you can't do and was usual many years ago was to park your car on the side of the track, close to the finish line, and wait for the leader to end the race so you could do it too.
Stopped in the pits for hours - yes.
Stopped or slowly moving about the track making a lap last more than 6 minutes - no.
I'll share this.
I am not saying Porsche didn't deserve it, I say Toyota deserved it more.
It wouldn't have hurt the Porsche guys much if they didn't win this one, but the whole Toyota crew is devastated now.
Toyota winning, Porsche second = Everyone happy
What we have now = Porsche and Audi happy with luck, Toyota guys hurt deeply
You do realize no one wants to win that way. I'll bet my life Toyota would prefer to lose this way than for Porsche to stop and "grant" them a win. That's pathetic and only tarnishes your victory because the world only remembers your victory as a gift.Yes and Porsche did it already 17 times before, so why not "grant" it Toyota at least once?
I don't expect any, either. Toyota knows Porsche had to run through the same gauntlet they did.Haven't seen any hostility from Toyota towards Porsche, either.
Not that I expected any. Just sayin'.
Now, we wait for Ford to make some kind of documentary on their road to success at Le Mans......
Man, read my damn posts correctly, I already stated several times that this is not what I meant for effs sake.You do realize no one wants to win that way. I'll bet my life Toyota would prefer to lose this way than for Porsche to stop and "grant" them a win.
I have just as everyone else. Don't blame us because you can't construct your meaning properly.Man, read my damn posts correctly, I already stated several times that this is not what I meant for effs sake.
Can't disagree, though Ford's sandbaggery scandal and post-race penalty feud add a considerable grain of salt to this victory.They built a brand new car, took it to Le Mans with a V6 TT(that shares 60% of the internals with a Taurus SHO V6 TT) and not only won their class but finished 1-3-4 and had all four cars enter finish the 24 hour race.
While the 1966 1-2-3 win was fantastic it was only after the failure of 1965.
What Ford did here is a fantastic accomplishment and does deserve a documentary and praise to show that a family car company can still dominate the production car classes at the 24 hours of Le Mans(Not to mention the Ferrari 488 was a brand new car too.).
Can't disagree, though Ford's sandbaggery scandal and post-race penalty feud add a considerable grain of salt to this victory.
Such a shame, as someone who's been rooting for GTs because of adoration of this spaceship-like piece of machinery, I'm nearly heartbroken. Stop it, Ford, you did good enough already, now you're just making things worse for yourself. :'(
Funny how Ford and Ferrari are arguing like two children while the guys at Porsche, AMR, and Corvette haven't been complaining despite being specced to compete in another class all together.
Ford GT were given last minute BoP changes with both weight and boost restrictions so Ferrari trying to argue they were outside of GTE-Pro Performance is a bunch of crap when the 488 kept up to the end of the race.
Not to mention the Corvette was give a last minute weight reduction.
Corvette weren't giving a weight reduction they were just given the ability to use larger restrictors which they didn't because they didn't have the ability to machine them in time for the race. Aston is who you're probably thinking of.
Not only that despite whatever BoP Ford were given (so were Ferrari by the way), they were still able to put down lap times they showed in quali and take a track record for the class. Yeah the BoP really worked, but in reality all it showed was that there was a potential that even in Ford were still even sandbagging in quali.
Aston's V8 Vantages will breathe easier thanks to a further 0.4 mm opening of its air restrictors, which will increase power and torque. The Corvette C7.Rs received a 0.3 mm air restrictor break, but the team only has restrictors in hand that would allow a 0.2 mm break.
"It's a move in the right direction," said Corvette Racing program manager Doug Fehan. "The [0.3 mm] is enough of an improvement that we need to find a solution because we only have restrictors that will get us [0.2 mm]."
The C7.Rs were also given an additional seven liters of fuel capacity. The Porsche 911 RSRs did not receive weight or air restrictor changes, but now have eight liters of new fuel capacity.
Your username doesn't help the fact you are bias.They received BoP changes at the last minute for that sandbagging too.
In fact they had both a boost restriction(4200-7000 RPM) and a weight restriction.) and that was the league's decision for balancing the cars. Same goes for Ferrari who had a weight restrictions while the Corvette had a weight reduction.
Only one arguing like a child is Ferrari saying that the Ford isn't in the GTE-PRO performance window when their own car kept up with it to the end.
Your username doesn't help the fact you are bias.
So can you explain why Ford wanted to lodge a protest against Ferrari in the last 20 mins of the race for not having functional leader lights? Pretty pathetic when the #68 car having a minute lead over Risi with the #69 car being only 20 seconds behind 2nd. Looked like a desperate attempt to get a 1-2.
The Stewards upheld its ruling to force Risi to repair its car’s broken leader lights, following a protest lodged by Ford Chip Ganassi Racing in the final hour of the race.
The team has been given a 20-second post-race penalty and 5,000 Euro fine as a result of not adhering to the black-and-orange flag.
A Risi team representative told Sportscar365 they will not appeal the ruling.
It was the desperate attempt to get a 1-2. :/Looked like a desperate attempt to get a 1-2.
Well, they did as they didn't do the pit-stop penalty.Can you explain how the Ferrari team decided to not challenge the penalty?
Well, they did as they didn't do the pit-stop penalty.
In my eyes, poor sportsmanship by Chip Ganassi.
Why would they appeal to it when they secured second after the penalty has been imposed.Yet they are refusing to appeal it?
Don't try and play that it wasn't fair when the Risi Team decided it was fair.