Not happening, trust me.Is making the next Z a crossover to tap into a new market really the right decision, or just plain wrong?
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/new-nissan-z-car-be-crossover
Indeed - to me, that seems much more likely to be the next Juke. I spoke to Nissan's CCO at Le Mans this year and he said that the new Juke would be shown at an upcoming auto show. A Frankfurt concept reveal - or possibly Tokyo in October - would fit in with those comments.Edit: Just some clarification, that concept has nothing to do with the new Z.
I wouldn't necessarily say "new Juke" more like "Juke replacement".Indeed - to me, that seems much more likely to be the next Juke. I spoke to Nissan's CCO at Le Mans this year and he said that the new Juke would be shown at an upcoming auto show. A Frankfurt concept reveal - or possibly Tokyo in October - would fit in with those comments.
That said - I don't object entirely to the idea of a Z crossover. The styling needs to work, and it certainly needs to be fun, but Nissan is at its best when it's making quirky stuff.
That, and I agree with the comments in the Autocar story that you can't really go "up" from the 370Z.
I like the current 370, and I really like the Nismo version, but it'd need fundamentally changing in its next generation to continue selling. The market has changed, and while I'm sure there's a modest market out there for a brutish six-cylinder coupe, it's only modest. They're just not fuel-efficient enough now, the power delivery characteristics now seem outdated next to modern turbo'd fours (and truth be told, the 370's engine is a bit nasty anyway) and if you keep giving it more power than it has to get more expensive too.
One and the same thing. I'm not sure if I'm understanding you correctly, but if you're implying Nissan plans to replace the Juke with something not carrying the Juke name, I'd be very surprised.I wouldn't necessarily say "new Juke" more like "Juke replacement".
From that, I read that it'll look quite different from the current Juke, but it'll keep the youthful feel.Nakamura cautioned that he ‘cannot say too much’ on the look of the next Juke, but the car won’t simply be a rehash of the existing car.
Instead, it will be ‘innovative and exciting’ and ‘inherit the spirit’ of the current Juke.
Be surprised.One and the same thing. I'm not sure if I'm understanding you correctly, but if you're implying Nissan plans to replace the Juke with something not carrying the Juke name, I'd be very surprised.
Like the one already going into the Q60 coupe?They should make the V6 smaller. Let's say, 3 liters even. Then they should take one turbo, and then take another turbo, and put them both on there.
They could call it "300Z". Then add an "X" so it sounds cooler.
ALL THE MONIESAnd while at it, reduce weight as much as possible and apply semi-active 4-wheel steering to make it a competitor to Cayman/low end 911 like it used to be. Give it more variants than just cabrio, coupe and Nismo. Take a page from GT86 and offer a strippermodel with no power windows, AC, radio, give it steelies and unpainted bumpers.. But, since we're talking of the Nissan/Renault, I don't see that happening because it would be a small niche model.. But one can hope.
They should make the V6 smaller. Let's say, 3 liters even. Then they should take one turbo, and then take another turbo, and put them both on there.
Nissan Gripz Crossover teased
Looks great, but also really expensive. Would also need quite a bit of work to make it a convertible.
Nissan Gripz Crossover teased
Looks like it ought to have guns mounted on the bodywork.
Because they 370 is visually no different then the 350 that hasn't changed since 2002.That would look a lot more visually appealing than the 370. I felt that car dated quickly.