DesertPenguin09
(Banned)
- 7,398
- Long Island, New York
- DesertPenguin09
Yea I know it's only 3 hours in but I was curious if any rival teams are still close, stuff like that. I guess it's too soon to really know how it's gonna go
Yeah, I think if Gibson can run them at full RPM, they should be much more competitive. Looking forward to see what the Gibsons can do at Sebring. 👍I know this has been touched on slightly in the Rolex 24 thread, but I think it's worth bringing here as well. Since the Gibsons were turned down (IIRC due to RPM limits) for the sake of reliability, could the gap between the Caddy's and the spec P2s if they run full RPM? If the Gibson can reliably run Sebring at full power, it seems like the gap would be closer than it currently is. I now that everyone talked about the BoP, but it's still hard to gauge the outright power difference if the Cadillac engine was running at full power and the Gibson wasn't.
I know this has been touched on slightly in the Rolex 24 thread, but I think it's worth bringing here as well. Since the Gibsons were turned down (IIRC due to RPM limits) for the sake of reliability, could the gap between the Caddy's and the spec P2s if they run full RPM? If the Gibson can reliably run Sebring at full power, it seems like the gap would be closer than it currently is. I now that everyone talked about the BoP, but it's still hard to gauge the outright power difference if the Cadillac engine was running at full power and the Gibson wasn't.
That's kind of what I was thinking. Rebellion having one of the strongest lineups in the whole grid certainly helped them along with their laps. But my guess is that Gibson didn't feel confident with the engine at Daytona yet and would rather test it at speed in actual completion at Sebring or another track on the schedule. The RPM sweep at other tracks may not strain them as much, so they may be able to run full song soon. I think it may be closer with the Gibson giving it everything it has.You bring up a point I completely forgot. That does explain a lot, doesn't it? Impressive, then, that the Rebellion split the Caddies in qualifying, but couldn't match race pace at all.
Regardless, I am very interested to see the prototypes at Sebring. Daytona always has a special set up we don't see anywhere else. You can have a car set up for the banking and the long straights, and get away with the infield section without too much compromise. Sebring is a much more traditional circuit, I'd like to think the pack will get at least a little closer together.
I'm also sure that some of these teams used the 24 as a large test session. I think we'll get there with the new cars.
God knows what's going to happen when we get to Long Beach, though.
If the Cadillac's weren't present it would've been a more equal fight between the DPi's and LMP2's. I think. Peg them back a bit and I think we're good. We'll find out at Sebring though what the regular season will look like, since Daytona essentially means nothing to the rest of the year (repeated too often but its true).I looked at the CSV file from Daytona and grabbed a rough avg of the top 30 trap speeds for the P class.
DPi
Cad 10- 195 mph
Cad 31- 195
Cad 5 - 194
Nis 22- 191 (car had 2 laps over 195 with Hartley then the rest around 191)
Maz 70- 191
Maz 55- 189
Nis 2- 188
P2 Gibson's
Ore 81- 191
Lig 52- 190
Ore 13-190
Ril 90- 190
Ore 85- 189
The ACO should be happy, and Ligier should be happy they have closed the speed gap to Oreca. It would have been nice to have a spec Dallara to compare them to the rest of the P2's.
The DPi column speaks for itself, and Fox sports and NASCAR enjoyed a nice bump and got their cross promotion.
If the Cadillacs werent there the race would have been a 1 hr highlight show on FS2 at 2am on a Wed like the WEC is.If the Cadillac's weren't present it would've been a more equal fight between the DPi's and LMP2's. I think. Peg them back a bit and I think we're good. We'll find out at Sebring though what the regular season will look like, since Daytona essentially means nothing to the rest of the year (repeated too often but its true).
That tin foil induced theory though.If the Cadillacs werent there the race would have been a 1 hr highlight show on FS2 at 2am on a Wed like the WEC is.
I'm worried what affect this his on other P team entries and DPi efforts. Faith in the IMSA technical people has to be pretty low today because despite all of their claims about data and windtunnel testing they were way off with Cadillac. If people on internet forums can see the sector times from the Roar and see that something wasnt right how did IMSA miss it?
TF hat on- AXR is the NASCAR home team, owned and controlled by former front office people. Gordon is the golden boy and with his job at Fox and the endless talk about him during the race. Boys have it it and rubbin is racin son seemed to be the theme of the day that was playing to a NASCAR audience and there was no way anybody else was going to win that race. TF hat off
Ask that again at the end of the year after we have a full season of DPi.That tin foil induced theory though.
Am I the only one who would actually be okay with IMSA dropping P as well and just having a large GTLM and GTD field? As much as I love the DPi's, the GT action is SO much more dramatic and awesome.
I'm biased because I do find GTE and GT3 more fun to watch. LMP just doesn't have the same zing.Ask that again at the end of the year after we have a full season of DPi.
The numbers I posted speak for themselves, this isnt #fakenews. Best laps 5-1:36.2, 10-1:36.3, 31-1:36.7 Only Hartley in the 22 managed to run a 1:37.8 before they turned down the boost and switched to the long game. No other DPi ran a lap under 1:39.I think before people get too bent out of shape about the BOP in DPi, I suggest we wait for a couple more events before really making a call.
They were faster in every sector by .3 sec so that argument doesnt stick.Fast in the traps and slow in the infield, OK, but everywhere? The Caddy 6.2L is closer to 650hp instead of the 600 they claimed in would be. W/O a power reduction they be just as fast at Sebring. I expect at least a 1.5mm air restrictor reduction at Sebring.Daytona is a very unique circuit, and rewards certain performance characteristics. Other tracks like Sebring, or Leguna Seca, or Watkins Glen, are quite different. If the Caddys are still miles ahead after a variety of circuits, then let's complain. Until then, let's wait.
Dont forget who is calling the shots here, the same people that thought up the chase, caution clock, and this new segment points mess.I love a conspiracy as much as the next guy, but find it tough to believe that IMSA would shoot themselves in the foot by being funny with the BOP just for a quick publicity stunt at the cost of the long term manufacturer interest.
Hopefully the word today from HQ to the P teams is we hope you understand why we did it, why we needed the exposure ,and we will take care of you the rest of the way.
I noticed he ignored the whole post I put in here and the one you put in the Rolex 24 thread about the Gibson having the RPM limit that put it down on power as well. The fact that Gibson asked teams to not let the spec cars run the engines at full power certainly had an impact on their pace. Or that he keeps talking about the massive improvement the Cadillac saw in the race but ignores that the Nissan also had a big jump as well. Or the fact that the Caddy was the car that had the most development out of all the DPi machines. If the Gibson runs the full RPM at Sebring and still gets slaughtered due to lap time gap, he could maybe say he has a point. But my guess is that everyone else will see a jump because everyone else will see a lap time improvement from extra development.Could it be that the Cadillacs are basically the WEC winning Porsche with a big Cadi engine in the back?(just like how Oreca's 05 was nothing more then Rebellions "R-One" in P2 form)? Remember that the bae underneath is built by Dallara, the same company that has been making all of the tubs on Audi's P1 cars.
You love trolling this thread with the NASCAR conspiracy theories, don't you? Ever since the merger, all there ever is the "Evil NASCAR is doing this" nonsense with you. I know you love that tinfoil hat of yours, but I'm warning you that's gonna do you no good when it starts raining heavy.
Having a secret NASCAR backed hybrid system installed would explain why the wind tunnel and engine dyno tests were so far off. If anybody knows how to cheat it is Gary Nelson based on his years catching them. The Dallara/Audi connection ended in 2013 BTW. Audi switched to a company called YCOM to build the chassis in 2014.Could it be that the Cadillacs are basically the WEC winning Porsche with a big Cadi engine in the back?(just like how Oreca's 05 was nothing more then Rebellions "R-One" in P2 form)? Remember that the bae underneath is built by Dallara, the same company that has been making all of the tubs on Audi's P1 cars.
It's too cold to rain here today, but I have seen some snowflakes. They must be spraying the clouds again.💡You love trolling this thread with the NASCAR conspiracy theories, don't you? Ever since the merger, all there ever is the "Evil NASCAR is doing this" nonsense with you. I know you love that tinfoil hat of yours, but I'm warning you that's gonna do you no good when it starts raining heavy.
I ignored you because you dont know what the hell you are talking about. The BOP table was created AFTER the request came from Gibson about the engines.I noticed he ignored the whole post I put in here and the one you put in the Rolex 24 thread about the Gibson having the RPM limit that put it down on power as well. The fact that Gibson asked teams to not let the spec cars run the engines at full power certainly had an impact on their pace.
I would have been worried if the Nissan didnt improve considering they spend a day at the test trying to get their laptop to talk to the car before it would start at the Roar. The Caddy program was on track testing in October when the Nissan program was still being designed.Or that he keeps talking about the massive improvement the Cadillac saw in the race but ignores that the Nissan also had a big jump as well. Or the fact that the Caddy was the car that had the most development out of all the DPi machines.
There is no doubt that Cadillac is way ahead of the other DPi's, but this is not a open category. Good or bad they have to use BOP to control the costs. The baseline for the BOP was supposed to be the Gibson, bigly fail on that one.Or the fact that the Caddy was the car that had the most development out of all the DPi machines. If the Gibson runs the full RPM at Sebring and still gets slaughtered due to lap time gap, he could maybe say he has a point. But my guess is that everyone else will see a jump because everyone else will see a lap time improvement from extra development.
The baseline for the BOP was supposed to be the Gibson, bigly fail on that one.
Agreed the Gibson is a beautiful engine. As one of the team owners said at the roar, it's like a throwback to old IndyCar motors.What a phenomenal race.
The Gibson engines are LOUD. When we were sitting in the stands toward T1, you'd have the line on 3 Cadillacs with a Gibson powered car behind them, and you'd CLEARLY hear the wail of the Gibson motor above them all. They did a great job with that spec engine.
Was really surprised and happy to see SoD get third place in that Riley. Weakest car for the track, aero wise, least amount of time testing with the car, etc, and they were able to pull it off.
Also, I was SUPER conflicted at the end of the race. I really, really like WTR, and have friends that work on the AXR team, so you can see the dilemma.
Hey fellas, quick question.... what are the good websites out there for IMSA news?
So far I have bookmarked,
Motorsport.com
SC365
Racer
NASportscar
dailysportscar
Any other good ones I should know about? Thanks.