- 85,962
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Cool.What? You don’t think I understand the points you’re trying to make? I know my view in terms of abortion is complicated. I’m fine with that. I’m not looking to have an online epiphany, nor am I looking to change anyone’s mind myself.
Not trying to make points. Literally asking you straightforward yes/no questions. The last one took three posts before you attempted it, the current one four. Haven't even mentioned abortion.
That rather being the thrust of the original comment, still. You're evading entirely rational questioning because you cannot have a rational conversation. Rational conversations with people who deny bodily autonomy are impossible, and every response you make where you evade it is further proof.You’re still, the only one that’s trying to have a conversation about it.
"QED" means "Quod Erat Demonstrandum", or "that which was to be demonstrated". In short, what you subsequently did matched the expectations of the earlier statement on what you would do.
It's not a hard question: do you, regardless of what legislation says, have an expectation of bodily autonomy?
As you're Mustafaing it bigly, here's the question again to make it three times the exact same question has been asked of you: do you, regardless of what legislation says, have an expectation of bodily autonomy?
It's "yes" or "no", as any equivocation from "yes" means "no" because it's all or nothing. Bear in mind that I already elaborated on what "bodily autonomy" means, so there's no need to act confused about it.
One word is all it takes to answer, not a post full of reasons why you won't answer, have forgotten the question, don't know what's asked of you, or calling people names.
Yes or no?