GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,591
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Joe Donaldson (@Joey D) on May 9th, 2018 in the Car Culture category.
Does this car even have a roof beyond the targa style body?
So it's a retractable hardtop like the Spider?Yup, it's the same roof from the 458.
No top.So it's a retractable hardtop like the Spider?
Not to dig or anything but does anyone else see a bit of Silvia S14 in the front grille?
Yes, it does look like that!
That's terrible, ugliest ferrari ever. Without doubt a proof that Pininfarina isn't here anymore.
I don't count that thing as a ferrari.
So it's a retractable hardtop like the Spider?
No top.
(today they seem to be exclusive luxury goods only, with too much power and unresponsive handling).
Wait, what?
I don't know about how you feel with modern Ferraris - but they don't provide the outstanding handling their old counterparts still used to have. To me it seems modern supercars compensate the lack of handling with power (which isn't only the case for Ferrari, I think the same goes for others like Lamborghini, Bugatti, Pagani, McLaren, Porsche...)
Of course I can only judge this from driving in simulators - but older 'supercars' tend to be true 'sportscars' whereas modern 'supercars' try to demonstrate an excess of power.
This why I think today that Alfa Romeo, Alpine, Caterham, Lotus, Toyota, Subaru etc build better sportscars than Ferrari.
I don't know about how you feel with modern Ferraris - but they don't provide the outstanding handling their old counterparts still used to have. To me it seems modern supercars compensate the lack of handling with power (which isn't only the case for Ferrari, I think the same goes for others like Lamborghini, Bugatti, Pagani, McLaren, Porsche...)
Of course I can only judge this from driving in simulators - but older 'supercars' tend to be true 'sportscars' whereas modern 'supercars' try to demonstrate an excess of power.
This why I think today that Alfa Romeo, Alpine, Caterham, Lotus, Toyota, Subaru etc build better sportscars than Ferrari.
They must not have thought much of him, then.This is why in 2013, shortly after Pininfarina’s death Ferrari wanted something special to honor him.
That's my point: driving a sportscar doesn't necessarily mean to be the fastest on track (of course it does in a race of the same class), but to experience the dynamic behavior of a car.Reports of the real cars, especially with something like the 458 Speciale said the cars were sharper than ever. Sure, if low speed tactility is your watch word, then so be it, but a 348tb is going to look like a shambles next to a modern Barchetta.
It doesn't. The original concept was to showcase an open top vehicle, similar to the SLR Sterling Moss. They kept that same idea for the production car; the windscreen was fitted (along with lifting the nose) for regulation purposes according to Ferrari.Based on everything I read about the car, it's a removable hard top.
I think so myself. Not a fan of matte black bits.Not a fan but maybe it's the paintwork that accentuates wrong parts of the design ?
I spy with my little eye, something simply stunning...
Debatable. Even not taking elitists' hatred towards anything made in XXI century, F50 isn't that bad to not to deserve attention.Everything next to that blue Sergio is way more interesting