True but like The Ferrari, no one is going to call it by its English translation.Imagine spending $18 million on something that's just called "The Black Car". It's like Ferrari calling one of its cars "The Ferrari"....oh wait.
La Voiture Noire sounds much nicer off the tongue.
They can't do you a car, but there's a windmill.I want mine in red.
I quite like Chris Harris' opinion of it:
It's a dumb thing that shouldn't exist. This isn't the way to do coachwork.
I quite like Chris Harris' opinion of it:
It's a dumb thing that shouldn't exist. This isn't the way to do coachwork.
Not if you're French or speak French, it sounds like a non-car person giving a really vague description of a random vehicle.
I was intrigued, and it doesnt appear as though the wheelbase is any longer. The doors are definitely shorter, with the leading edge a considerable distance from the front wheel arch compared to that of the Divo, but they also appear to be nearer to the rear wheel arch. Since I doubt the engine is any difference, this could be a bit of trickery with the door extending beyond the rear cabin bulkhead. In addition, the windshield pillar is set back from the leading edge of the door compared to the Divo, which makes the hood that much longer.That said, there's something bothering me about the area behind the front wheel arch. The Chiron and Divo both have the same profile - the windscreen ends almost directly above the front wheel centre, with the a-pillar ending forward of the rear of the wheel. This doesn't. The front wheel seems insanely far forwards by comparison, with even the back of the wheel well ahead of the windscreen.
It seems like a fundamentally different vehicle in terms of the body or chassis structure...
I was trying to be funny.They can't do you a car, but there's a windmill.
The idea here isn't to copy the Type 57SC, rather to tap into the same culture today as the original did in 1936. That culture has moved on in the last 83 years, and so the car's design will too. It's retained the ridge line, but then so have all the other cars since the new Bugatti arose.
That said, there's something bothering me about the area behind the front wheel arch. The Chiron and Divo both have the same profile - the windscreen ends almost directly above the front wheel centre, with the a-pillar ending forward of the rear of the wheel. This doesn't. The front wheel seems insanely far forwards by comparison, with even the back of the wheel well ahead of the windscreen.
It seems like a fundamentally different vehicle in terms of the body or chassis structure...
If they were going for a modern day Atlantic they have missed the mark because it bears hardly any resemblance to it apart from maybe that roof crease. It's not bad looking but it just looks like another Veyron / Chiron with a different bodykit.
I was also being funny, but in French. Moulin Rouge...A windmill?
That said, there's something bothering me about the area behind the front wheel arch. The Chiron and Divo both have the same profile - the windscreen ends almost directly above the front wheel centre, with the a-pillar ending forward of the rear of the wheel. This doesn't. The front wheel seems insanely far forwards by comparison, with even the back of the wheel well ahead of the windscreen.
It seems like a fundamentally different vehicle in terms of the body or chassis structure...
The official images are likely touched up to within an inch of the valley, but it is a real thing too:Is it even a physical thing at this moment in time or are these just renders? (its hard to tell these days)
It's pretty much double the price of a Divo.$13m seems completely arbitrary
I’ve read some rumors the car is going to Ferdinand Piech, arguably, the grandfather behind Bugatti’s current success (& owns 2 Veyrons between his wife and him according to Wiki). If that be the case, the car may be valued at $13m but I wouldn’t be surprised if Piech got some sort of slight, yet-still-ridiculously-high-amount-of-money deal.