GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,598
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Andrew Evans (@Famine) on March 21st, 2019 in the Automotive News category.
I asked Volvo UK about this and just got the response a minute after the article went up (I've added it into the article now):It’s going to be fun having a road trip singalong with an FBI agent!
With the cameras, Volvo aims to collect data only in the ambition to make its cars safer and only the data that is required for the systems. The cameras will not record video and no data will be gathered without the user’s consent. Exact technical setup is yet to be determined.
We take the privacy of our customers very seriously. Volvo Cars will not share any private data without the user first giving consent. By announcing the installation of in-car cameras, we want to start a conversation about whether car makers have the right or maybe even the obligation to install technology in cars that changes their drivers’ behavior.
Have a read of the response Volvo gave me to my question on this exact concern. It's in the article, and also two posts above yours.Invasion of privacy Volvo 👎
I second this entirely, all these new cars do is make (nice) used cars more desirable.@Famine so many of your articles seem to make me want to open used car websites. There was a time when you could buy a (new) car that was just a car. Like, you could drive it, and it would just do what you said.
@Famine so many of your articles seem to make me want to open used car websites. There was a time when you could buy a (new) car that was just a car. Like, you could drive it, and it would just do what you said.
People said the same thing when seat belts became mandatory, ABS mandatory, etc etc :-D
You just reminded me of my grandpa cutting the seatbelts out of his brand new 1985 Cadillac because "it's safer to be thrown out of the car in a crash than get tangled up in the seatbelt".I don't think seat belts should be mandatory (or ABS).
You just reminded me of my grandpa cutting the seatbelts out of his brand new 1985 Cadillac because "it's safer to be thrown out of the car in a crash than get tangled up in the seatbelt".
Ironically, that event was what got me interested in cars to begin with, since I wanted to figure out why the carmakers put those belts in there if they were supposedly so dangerous. So I guess it worked out okay, except for the two ton lawn decoration that grandma never let him forget about...I support your grandpa's right to be a moron.
At least, it will park itself then.Misread the title as "Volvo's cars will watch you die".
I guess that's also technically possible.
Volvo is now the police.Every breath you take
Every move you make
Every bond you break
Every step you take
I'll be watching you
As a Volvo fan, this doesn't really bother me. Volvo as a company is aiming to make the safest possible vehicles and it's now addressing the biggest issue when it comes to safety on the road, the human element.
Well aren't you a canary in a coalmine...Volvo is now the police.
Or autonomy, or individual accountability.Privacy seems to be a term for old school technology these days.
With the cameras, Volvo aims to collect data only in the ambition to make its cars safer and only the data that is required for the systems. The cameras will not record video and no data will be gathered without the user’s consent. Exact technical setup is yet to be determined.
We take the privacy of our customers very seriously. Volvo Cars will not share any private data without the user first giving consent. By announcing the installation of in-car cameras, we want to start a conversation about whether car makers have the right or maybe even the obligation to install technology in cars that changes their drivers’ behavior.
):
I don't use Facebook and the words you've attributed to me aren't mine, they're Volvo's.Are you not aware of how (for example) Facebook make such twisty and curvy terms/conditions? For many services you can not use without you consent, why wouldn't Volvo be one.