GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,924
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Joe Donaldson (@Joey D) on April 14th, 2019 in the Car Culture category.
So it's not always a bad thing because it didn't work for the Dart
I'm not so sure about that, but given the public now seem to be buying plenty of Ecosports even though they're crap, I'm sure they'd happily buy the Puma too.Despite the controversy, I think the Puma will still be a sales success. If it carries over all the likable aspects of the Fiesta without a significant compromise in driving quality, car journalists will love it and it will stack orders quickly.
I'm not so sure about that, but given the public now seem to be buying plenty of Ecosports even though they're crap, I'm sure they'd happily buy the Puma too.
It sells well for the reason most Fords sell well in the UK regardless of whether a car is good or not: there's a dealership in every town so buying one requires very little thought process.That's true, I'm actually baffled as to why the EcoSport is selling so well. Do people just see the Ford badge and assume it is dependable? To be fair, it will be cheap to run and insure but even for crossover standards, the EcoSport is just so !
You got that right. Location, location, location.It sells well for the reason most Fords sell well in the UK regardless of whether a car is good or not: there's a dealership in every town so buying one requires very little thought process.
I know. That was why I was noting that it was such an odd example to use, since your lead off in your bit for why the practice is not such a bad thing was discontinued in after such a terrible market performance that Marchionne himself had this to say about them:I didn't say it was a bad thing for the Dart, in fact, I said the opposite.
While it's perhaps not a bad thing, it certainly doesn't seem to help any.I can tell you right now that both the Chrysler 200 and the Dodge Dart, as great products as they were, were the least financially rewarding enterprises that we've carried out inside FCA in the last eight years. I don't know one investment that was as bad as these two were.
Same goes for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, which is pretty far from a sport compact with a crank-walk problem and a driver who’s a fan of tuna sandwiches.
Ford could use the Thunderbird nameplate for an electric version of the Mustang. They have a hybrid in the pipeline. The Lightning nameplate would be more fitting for whatever the Mach E will end up being.My mom bought a well equipped Dart Rallye 2.4 and man is it a fun car to tool around in. 180hp is nothing to snuff at in a car that size.
I just hope Ford brings back the Thunderbird and Lightning (very, very frightening?) names for Electric cars because they're perfect.
You got that right. Location, location, location.