- 3,709
- São Paulo
- Philip-Giger
It was cleared, first pic is real.Look at the grass in the second shot inside the curb, GT6 doesn't have it that detailed no? I think the OP might be right and this is a taste of what's to come graphically.
It was cleared, first pic is real.Look at the grass in the second shot inside the curb, GT6 doesn't have it that detailed no? I think the OP might be right and this is a taste of what's to come graphically.
It is GT6, you cannot see the grass and dandelions on gameplay or replay, but you can in photomode.Look at the grass in the second shot inside the curb, GT6 doesn't have it that detailed no? I think the OP might be right and this is a taste of what's to come graphically.
I'm confused, what were you correct about?True, that was unnecessary. But like I said before, I know whats GT6 and not GT6. In the end, I was correct so he shouldn't have quoted me in the first place.
About the real life pic not being a glimpse of GT7, but this was quoted to someone else so yeah.I'm confused, what were you correct about?
It will look better because pd are the gods of graphics. I don't buy that ps4 50% advantage business.^ Damn! That does look awesome (except the crowd). Good to know GT7 can look even better given the PS4's 50% GPU advantage over XBO.
But from what I can read, you are saying it looks like GT6 and the real life picture you now mentioned, you said the following below thinking it is not one so I'm struggling to understand what you think you are correct about?About the real life pic not being a glimpse of GT7, but this was quoted to someone else so yeah.
Seriously?... Not even close buddy.
You do realise the gt5/gt6 version of the nurburgring is still one of the most accurate models out there? Long before forza updated it this year. So if they imported it to gt7 it's not a problem at all.Doesn't matter. The fact that he thought I was wrong makes him the wrong one. Never assume Toko is blind again.
*Dances to his victory*
You're right.
I just love how Forza 5 modeled the Nurburgring. Real or not, it looks amazing. *High fives @SimTourist* PD needs to do the same, but atlas, they will just port the Nurburgring like the tracks from GT4.
Sorry, but what you're talking about? Are you saying that I said I was correct about GT6 being the real pic or......? I'm serioiusly lost on what you're trying to say...But from what I can read, you are saying it looks like GT6 and the real life picture you now mentioned, you said the following below thinking it is not one so I'm struggling to understand what you think you are correct about?
The sharp shadows are because the cars have such little ground clearance and the light has no real space in which to diffuse the shadow.Hard black shadows don't happen in real life, man, cause light bends around stuff.
No they are not. The first photo, the real life one, has the Toyota TS040-HYBRID 2014 with an Audi R18 e-tron 2014 behind. The GT6 picture you have with the front of the cars has the older generation of LMP1 cars Toyota TS030 HYBRID 2012 with the Audi R18 TDI 2011 behind. Same companies but completely different cars.The second screenshot is these two exact same cars, but this one has a watermark.
Those funky drawings are reflections on a sheet of slightly warped steel.Real life doesn't have funky drawings on the guardrailing and stains on the pavement.
This basically. I presume he's trying to save himself the embarrassment of admitting he called a real photo "clearly GT6", expecting much more in GT7. This is one of the "troll GT/PD at all costs" attitudes.But from what I can read, you are saying it looks like GT6 and the real life picture you now mentioned, you said the following below thinking it is not one so I'm struggling to understand what you think you are correct about?
First of all, I've been through much more embarrassing situations than this one, and second, I don't expect much from GT7 other than graphics. As a matter of fact, I don't expect anything at all from GT7, so go ahead and assume I'm a troll like most here do.This basically. I presume he's trying to save himself the embarrassment of admitting he called a real photo "clearly GT6", expecting much more in GT7. This is one of the "troll GT/PD at all costs" attitudes.
So I take it you can't find what you are correct about which you danced to your victory about and behaved all high and mighty towards hsv regarding this matter? Anyway hopefully Kaz doesn't step up his game if the end result is reality.First of all, I've been through much more embarrassing situations than this one, and second, I don't expect much from GT7 other than graphics. As a matter of fact, I don't expect anything at all from GT7, so go ahead and assume I'm a troll like most here do.
Also, yes, I'm not embarrassed to admit at calling a real photo GT6: PS4 Edition, which I bet GT7 will excatly be if Kaz doesn't step up his game. Conversation over, I got better stuff to do than argue on a fourm in the internet where the high and mighty tends to be.
Doesn't matter. The fact that he thought I was wrong makes him the wrong one. Never assume Toko is blind again.
*Dances to his victory*
Yes, so long as they are willing to put 13,000 man-hours into recreating the Nurburgring from scratch and laser scanned like Forza. A direct port will look the same as it does now in GT6. Forza's version is sensational.
All I'm seeing is GT6: PS4 Edition, not GT7.
I know whats GT6 and not GT6. That first pic screams GT6 all over it, not GT7. Besides, why will GT7 look like that anyway? If that really is a glimpse of GT7, than I'm sorry, but its GT6: PS4 Edition.You really think that 1st pic resembles the 3rd pic in some way? Are we looking at the same pictures....?I'm being 100% real here. It just looks like it was slightly edited, that can't be GT7. It's very GT6-like.Referring to the first picture...? Are you for real?All I'm seeing is GT6: PS4 Edition, not GT7.
EDIT: I also see new props were added in the first as well. Although, my mind just saids this "glimpse of GT7" looks very GT6-like.
Seriously?... Not even close buddy.Other than the fact it looks entirely like a real photograph?
Glad I'm not the only one who saw that. 👍 And someone started thinking/or believing I was blind? Heh...Those screens are faker than a supermodels tits.
How could you think those are real? The concrete on the side to the left look like they have sewage leaking down it.
Don't forget those guardrails that look like hollow plastic.
We don't know what this is..besides, there are obvious problems in the photos regarding texture.
The fact that you were wrong is what simply makes you wrong. End of story. The fact that you were adamant that a real life photo was simply a warmed over GT6 is what may have compelled the assumption that you were blind.Doesn't matter. The fact that he thought I was wrong makes him the wrong one. Never assume Toko is blind again.Where exactly? Maybe my sarcasm meter is off, but I don't see anywhere that you "Told" him so.Ohhhh @hsv? *chuckles* I told you so.Sorry to burst your bubble OP, but that pic is as real as it gets, just look at the exif data.
It was taken with a Sony A77 II and a Sigma lens.
*Dances to his victory*
You can repeat that you "know whats GT6 and not GT6" as many times as you wish, however, again, the fact that you were adamant that the real life photo was nothing more than a massaged GT6 clearly indicates otherwise. In the end, by unwaveringly affirming that the real photos could not possibly be GT7, specifically because they were too fake, you couldn't have been more far removed from being correct.About the real life pic not being a glimpse of GT7, but this was quoted to someone else so yeah.I'm confused, what were you correct about?[...] like I said before, I know whats GT6 and not GT6. In the end, I was correct so he shouldn't have quoted me in the first place.
Lol, you're pretty funny. You just went through the posts to basically complain about how decieved some of us were. Those big words aren't really doing a favor either because what you said could have been said in a way more simpler way. Lol, that dunce hat isn't anywhere near us.The fact that you were wrong is what simply makes you wrong. End of story. The fact that you were adamant that a real life photo was simply a warmed over GT6 is what may have compelled the assumption that you were blind.
You can repeat that you "know whats GT6 and not GT6" as many times as you wish, however, again, the fact that you were adamant that the real life photo was nothing more than a massaged GT6 clearly indicates otherwise. In the end, by unwaveringly affirming that the real photos could not possibly be GT7, specifically because they were too fake, you couldn't have been more far removed from being correct.
And most certainly, someone that claimed real life photos to be nothing more than a "slightly edited" GT6 can, in no way, assert victory over those who postulated those same photos to potentially be GT7. If anything, those who you so vehemently asserted victory against have more right to serve you the dunce hat.
Please stop embarrassing yourself.Lol, you're pretty funny. You just went through the posts to basically complain about how decieved some of us were. Those big words aren't really doing a favor either because what you said could have been said in a way more simpler way. Lol, that dunce hat isn't anywhere near us.
How am I embarrassing myself?Please stop embarrassing yourself.
The fact that you were wrong is what simply makes you wrong. End of story. The fact that you were adamant that a real life photo was simply a warmed over GT6 is what may have compelled the assumption that you were blind.
You can repeat that you "know whats GT6 and not GT6" as many times as you wish, however, again, the fact that you were adamant that the real life photo was nothing more than a massaged GT6 clearly indicates otherwise. In the end, by unwaveringly affirming that the real photos could not possibly be GT7, specifically because they were too fake, you couldn't have been more far removed from being correct.
And most certainly, someone that claimed real life photos to be nothing more than a "slightly edited" GT6 can, in no way, assert victory over those who postulated those same photos to potentially be GT7. If anything, those who you so vehemently asserted victory against have more right to serve you the dunce hat.
It's a real photo... this has been mentioned so many times, it was cleared up a long time back.it does look a bit gamey but it is a big improvement either way.
I don't argue with those who are my friends, and he's not one of them...Make sure you read this before posting:
1. We know it's a real photo now
2. the above argument is happily now over
Also @hsv and @TokoTurismo I hope you two have made friends again