- 626
- Northern Ireland
- GTRP_mirial
You seem very worried about a "system", what's wrong with people choosing their own way?
No, no no no, that's a crock. I was (arguably) promiscuous in my youth, do you think I'd be damaged somehow? I was having the time of my bloody life as it happens.
Moral guidance? From this "system" you're proposing? Who gives this guidance, and what business is it of theirs?
Bless them, all they wanted was a new ironing board cover and some valium. I mean seriously... you think women can't enjoy casual sex without male permission? You've got a bit to learn about the world, imo.
I'm sure plenty of those women would say it's none of your **** **** **** business, and that's because it isn't. Do you talk to/about people like this in real life? I mean... you can't... surely?
Why is that your business, or is this something to do with the rule "system" you were talking about?
I think I have a right to enquiry because I feel they have been victims of being pumped and dumped, cheated on, or traded-in. I'm not even a feminist, but the sadness was written all over their faces on the Saturday nights when I used to go out.
There is no system
Source required.
If somebody said that to me in real life I'd think they were either not old enough or sexually experienced enough to lecture anybody. Of course men can feel used - the only world where that doesn't happen is 1950s comic books. Life isn't like that.
Source required for your made-up internet numbers.
There isn't much choice, because promiscuity becomes the culture particularly at university because the rules are set by very horny dudes fighting over women. Unfortunately there will be many women who will get "pumped and dumped" in the process that don't meet the standards of the higher tier men (women are hypergamous and usually throw their lot in with men a at least a couple of points better than themselves.
I'm sure you did, but as I said before, it's still an accolade for a man to boast of his numbers and not for a woman.
The old system before the sexual revolution where virgins were highly prized and society was collectively better off longer term.
They enjoy it at the time, but men just don't care if the culture isn't to care for anything, and many times, men just pump and dump women to have their needs met. Friends of friends have done it abandoning women in their mid-thirties, so Goodness knows what else is going on out there. Two millennials who live beside me and opposite already have two children to two different partners and thet come from decent middle class families.....not good.
It's none of my business, but they just make women look ugly without the wearer/sufferer realising it. Anyone with a sharp eye for good art realises this and unfortunately a lot of the general public have been led to believe it's cool because they have become the norm.
I think I have a right to enquiry because I feel they have been victims of being pumped and dumped, cheated on, or traded-in. I'm not even a feminist, but the sadness was written all over their faces on the Saturday nights when I used to go out.
I know there's no system; it's lawlessness within the law and dog eat dog.
Women are more likely to feel used than men, and perhaps those men who are not old enough or sexually experienced enough can be sucked in and spat out, or worse, used to have children with (like a close friend where the estranged wife lives with the three kids and her lesbian lover).
That was an exaggerated joke although there is probably some truth in it.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2012/03/promiscuity-data-guest-post.html
Where do you live, is it Earth!?
Not every woman wants children...
****, I hope I'm not alive when it catches up to men...
Wait... not.. the Lizard People again!!
Finally, we've gotten to the science.
Have you ever had sex?
You do realise, that sex, for both men and women, is more than just hammering home those 2 inches... right? That sex scene in the Inbetweeners, wasn't an instruction guide... I don't think you know or have spoken to any women, bar women in your family... maybe?
Women can and should (and can and do) sleep with who they want. They don't need some white knight coming to save their virginity... in the same way a bloke can sleep with who he wants (of what ever gender)... no human rates the person they want to settle down with on a scoring system based on one night stand performances.
There's a good percentage of women out there who feel they've missed the boat I can tell you, as per my response to 1081.
The L!z@rd people....you have to question why society doesn't function as well as it used to before the sexual revolution. I think you guys here fully understand this already; The break-up of the traditional family unit was the intended result because a bunch of social reformers in the US understood that the unloved with a chip on their shoulder usually came from broken homes were liberal. Making everyone liberal was the long-term desired effect, and you do that by breaking up the family unit by making sex completely free before any long-term relationships take place (see graph above).
Yes I have had sex with a few women and of course it's much more than the physical part, but I'm at that age where I simply cannot be bothered getting involved with divorcees etc, or having to meet the high expectations of those good looking ones who are still childless. You generally meet the good ones when you're young when natural chemistry is more likely and you don't even have to be bothered with crap like 'game'. @Joey D
* game is for those men to artificially make themselves like Alpha males in order to compete in a highly competitive sexual market place which enables the user to fake it, until he makes it.
Why would left-leaning men benefit from not being compared to other men that a woman may have had sex with? Why would that benefit any man?
Maybe it's just me, but the idea of a sexually experienced woman who knows what she likes and what other men like is pretty attractive. Having sex with only one or two people your whole life pretty much guarantees that you'll never experience the full breadth of what is available, and that you'll never really be very good at it. Practice makes perfect, and you don't become a great racing driver simply by doing laps of Laguna Seca for forty years.
Is this one of those times where you're mistaking your personal opinion for fact? Regardless, a tattoo is about what the person wearing it thinks of it. If a woman (or a man) likes having something drawn on their body, I don't see why they should give two tugs of a dead dogs 🤬 what you think about it.
Why not? Is having a child the only value that a woman's life can have?
I understand the implications of a lack of sexual experience, and I understand that this is an attractive quality which is the downside of having little or no experience. I knew a girl once who partly divorced her husband either because he had ED or micro-penis.
Outside of my own experience, I do generally think that sexual compatibility is in sync with the personalities any way.
As for the tats, I think the women that set the standard for News/Weather presenting are the prime example of femininity and class to follow and not the masses. I sincerely believe those women that get them don't really want them and are just bored of their current appearance..
Last edited: