Swift
And by this statement you show that you know NOTHING about the scholarship programs in the USA. Do you know how many people are turned down for help because they make TOO MUCH money?
This country is the place you can start with nothing and have a whole lot if you're willing to work for it. Plain and simple.
You say people don't want to live in the ghettos. That's true, but they also, for the most part are unwilling make the effort that it takes to get out of said situation. Be a rapper or a pro athlete? How about score above 800 on the SAT's? How about apply for some grants and scholarships to get an education. Nope, I'm going to bet the farm on becoming a pro athlete. I'm not saying I came from the ghetto. But my parents DID. My father grew up in one of the poorest parts of Philidelphia at the time. He now owns a 5 bedroom house, 2 cars and 1/4 an acre of land. Not including his investments. He didn't have rich parents paving the way for him. Infact his father died when he was 14 and his mother when he was 22. So, it was HIM that did the work to get to where he is.
Don't lay this, "You've got to be rich to get ahead in America" line on me. Because it's simply not true.
Yeah, probably too many people get turned down for fincancial help to get their kids through college.
About your own personal history, yes it IS possible to get to a higher level in the USA if you're willing to work for it, but it's too hard for most people when they are poor. I never said that the USA is the most inequal place on earth. Your father is probably an exception of the rule and really went down a long road to get where he is now.
If it is because people are lazy that they're still living in the ghetto, then why do you guys in the States still have ghettos, but we in Europe do not? Are Americans more lazy? No they aren't, we're all built the same way, we're all people.
I think it's better when a government spends money on pulling some more people over the line, to have them get a good education / future to keep them from crime / bumming around, than spending that same money on arresting these people and keeping them in prisons.
People should be willing to put in effort to get somewhere, but not everyone thinks the same way, so when it seems like it's too hard to get somewhere many people will give up, while a few exceptions like your father continue to struggle to get higher up there. To put it in metaphor form: Instead of spending money on having police arrest those who are trying to pull themselves higher up by grabbing the ankles of are already higher onto the hill, the same money should be spent on bulldozers to help making the hill less steep.
Swift
Then what's the point of earning money and providing for your children? I'm serious. If I can afford to send my child to Johns Hopkins, Harvard, Princton, Yale, MIT or any of those prestigous schools I'm going to do it. Should they have a desire to study what those schools specialize in.
You say it's unfair that just because the parents had money they could get their child into say, Notre Dame, but the other child could only get enough for say the local state university. That's excellent. It gives the student an oppurtunity. Besides, more money doesn't always mean better education.
Of course you should save money to try and get your children the best education they can get. That's how the current system works, you have to play by the rules. This doesn't mean that the current system shouldn't be improved though.
And you are right that more money doesn't mean that the education you get is better. But degrees from some universities simply have more prestige, making it easier to get your foot in the door of a company.... whether or not you're better at what you do.