America - The Official Thread

  • Thread starter ///M-Spec
  • 39,292 comments
  • 1,760,199 views
It's a pretty biased source. All I remember about him is he led the awful TWA 800 investigation which would later become a benchmark for How Not To Investigate Things. He effectively wrote a conclusion and made sure all the facts fitted.

In this case there might be some truth in what he says (and we really don't know) but it'd be preferable to see those facts from a proper investigation.
The man's who's Chairman of a foundation that has received over a million dollars in donations from Trump is a supporter of Trump?

Say its not so.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-donald-trumps-top-fbi-fanboy
 
ca7AYEB7XEM.jpg

krwoGvzDco0.jpg
 
Or...you know...

michael-bolton1.jpg


And when he gets 🤬-canned by Trump, he can belt out "How am I supposed to live without you?"
 
Question for American friends that comes fro discussion in the British Thread.

Could you walk down a street in America saying ''Gas the Jews" and escape all punishment under freedom of speech laws?

Context. Scottish man posts video of Pug doing Nazi salute and is trained to do so in response to the command 'gas the jews'. Many American commentators have jumped on the guilty verdict as an affront to free speech.
 
Question for American friends that comes fro discussion in the British Thread.

Could you walk down a street in America saying ''Gas the Jews" and escape all punishment under freedom of speech laws?

Context. Scottish man posts video of Pug doing Nazi salute and is trained to do so in response to the command 'gas the jews'. Many American commentators have jumped on the guilty verdict as an affront to free speech.
Legally yeah, unless they can find a way to twist it into hate speech. I can't tell you what the people would do though...
I heard about that today, utterly ridiculous.
 
Question for American friends that comes fro discussion in the British Thread.

Could you walk down a street in America saying ''Gas the Jews" and escape all punishment under freedom of speech laws?

Context. Scottish man posts video of Pug doing Nazi salute and is trained to do so in response to the command 'gas the jews'. Many American commentators have jumped on the guilty verdict as an affront to free speech.

You would likely face charges here as well if done on public property. It actually doesn't sound all that different than this case.

However if you were doing it on private property it would certainly be up for debate.
 
Legally yeah, unless they can find a way to twist it into hate speech. I can't tell you what the people would do though...
I heard about that today, utterly ridiculous.
How is it not hate speech?

You would likely face charges here as well if done on public property. It actually doesn't sound all that different than this case.

However if you were doing it on private property it would certainly be up for debate.
Agreed that on private property but placing such a video on a public, and somewhat well followed) YouTube channel puts it in the public domain, no?
 
Now aside from the inaccuracies of the first sentence, I awaiting the influx of posts saying that this is unconstitutional, that full autos are not really illegal and this doesn't actually turn semi into fully auto and that actually 'good guys with guns' are the real answer.

Not that it will pass anyway.
I feel like this is why it was screenshotted; it's gonna be taken down...

:lol:
 
Agreed that on private property but placing such a video on a public, and somewhat well followed) YouTube channel puts it in the public domain, no?

Like I said, it would be up for debate and would likely come down to the judge-prosecutor combo.
 
You would likely face charges here as well if done on public property. It actually doesn't sound all that different than this case.

However if you were doing it on private property it would certainly be up for debate.
I don't quite understand what happened with this case. Was the whole thing thrown out becuase the statute was deemed unconstitutional or was Black acquitted and the two guys who tried to burn a cross on their black neighbour's property found guilty of intimidation?
 
Depends on the context. I'm pretty sure he taught his dog to do that for laughs.
I'd argue that hate speech is hate speech regardless of the motivation behind it and/or target audience.
 
Back