- 30,026
- a baby, candy, it's like taking.
- TexRex72
No comment on Trump?
No comment on Trump?
Makes me wonder what his opinion would be if a woman is pregnant as a result of rape? “Tough luck it is your fault you got raped....oh wait”He would argue that you can put the child up for adoption. I guess I shouldn't have been surprised by his opinion. In a way it does make a little bit of sense that an Atheist would value life more than a religious person would (one that believes in an afterlife of some sort), and therefore would be seemingly more inclined to be pro life. If one chance at life is all you get, then I can see how he would think that way and want to protect life, especially the unborn who can't speak for themselves.
Edit:
I forgot to mention that he was a completely unsympathetic ass about it too. Literally no sympathy for the people that had unprotected sex that resulted in the pregnancy in the first place. You could counter him with something like: but what about the mom, what if she is a teenager with her whole life in front of her? Should she have to bear a child for 9 months, take time off school to have a child she does not want? To which he would say "tough luck, it's your mistake, not the child's" and he had even less sympathy would-be teenage father "Play grownup games and you get grownup prizes, time to be a man and pay for your mistakes and make it right." and he would usually finish with something like "Look, you can have sex but don't do it unprotected if you don't wants kids (yet or ever)".
Did he ever have anything to say about unwanted pregnancies that resulted from the failure of whatever birth control might have been used? Hard to describe that as the result of irresponsible behavior.
That is often countered by that she shouldn’t have had sex on the first place. Especially religious nuts. Or that she knew the risks, because birth control isn’t 100%.
...and that risk is an abortion.
That was an hypothetical answer that I hear from Pro-life people. So the risk is to become a parent unintentially.
I am pro Choice as stated in my personal experience I shared.
has an abortion simply cause they don't want the child.
I know......that is kinda what it's for.
I know...
No I know that you're pro-choice. I was saying that it's circular reasoning to say that the risk is to become a parent and then point to that as a reason why abortions shouldn't be allowed. The risk could be an abortion. Assuming that the risk is to become a parent is a "begging the question" fallacy.
Sorry I have trouble understanding the statement. What where you trying to say?
Did my post not explain itself?So what's the problem?
I don't know what proportion of abortions were caused by couples deliberately choosing not to use contraception so they could abort the pregnancy afterwards but I'm guessing it's not a high one.
I'm not sure overturning Roe v. Wade would have much of an effect on the number of parents wanting abortions anyway. Prior to that legal decision there were states which allowed abortion so I think it would lead to a Republic of Ireland-style situation with folks travelling to states in which it wasn't outlawed to terminate their pregnancies.
Did my post not explain itself?
I don't know what proportion of abortions were caused by couples deliberately choosing not to use contraception so they could abort the pregnancy afterwards but I'm guessing it's not a high one.
I edited the post you quoted. Now that I think about your circular comment I kinda see what you mean.Not really. As best I can tell, you just don't like abortion. I suppose you don't care to elaborate on that. Fair enough, this probably isn't the thread for it.
According to this article federal appeals courts are already in the process of increasing restrictions on abortions regardless of the status of RvW.Its about the legal right of an individual to be free to make their own choices concerning early term pregnancy.
Not that put much too weight into approval ratings, but Trump's 50 percent approval rating (as of yesterday) compared to Macron's new low of 27 percent is particularly noteworthy, as are the Yellow Vests protests. Macron may finish his term with the lowest approval ratings of any French PM in history, stop and think about that, it's actually kind of amazing really, the power of the people's voice, the right to protest, the right free speech and expression and all of that. It's all on display in the streets of Paris right now. Where Trump will finish remains to be seen, but in the near term, if we enter a recession in the next year, it almost certainly will certainly have a negative impact on his ratings.
Edit- had to fact check myself, Macron would still have ways to go, Hollande had a 12% approval rating in 2014, which I did not realize his rating ever dipped that low.
Rasmussen.I still cant fathom how Trump polls that high.
Rasmussen.
The message sent by the French people is abundantly clear, and that is don't mess with people's pocketbooks. I can't imagine it's really any different with American sentiment. I think with Trump, he is deeply flawed, has an obnoxious personality, he isn't endearing (like George HW Bush was), but as long as he keep's people's wallets happy, they have shown they will tolerate him (for now).
The message sent by the French people is abundantly clear, and that is don't mess with people's pocketbooks. I can't imagine it's really any different with American sentiment. I think with Trump, he is deeply flawed, has an obnoxious personality, he isn't endearing (like George HW Bush was), but as long as he keep's people's wallets happy, they have shown they will tolerate him (for now).
Why?In reality if you subtract the margin of error from the Rasmussen poll, that would still put Trump at 47%. I would trust that figure more than what fivethirtyeight said.