Not completely wrong, the main issues with modern monetary Policies start and end with Central banks, but it's obvious Trump wants to lower interest rates to make it seem like his term has economic growth, even though when you lower interest rates all you do is basically expand credit growth as loans get cheaper.
What truly worrying times we live in when someone who is so clearly unhinged still has the support of so many.
"Unhinged" is a fun and interesting word. It is completely correct to say Trump has no political experience, is highly amoral and only rather floaty respect for anything other than his own whims. So generally unhinged. But in this context - the Presidency of the USA - he can be compared only to his competition in this contest, not people applying elsewhere for other offices or positions. In motorsports terms, he was in a qualifying race against a dozen or so Republicans who were fulsomely described by the media as the finest collective group of presidential candidates in the history of the party. And he was in a race against one female in the final. Somehow, he easily mopped the floor against all other Republicans, and won a squeaker against a very damaged Hillary. And the ONLY thing he is "good" at is social media. So how is he hinged or unhinged? As far as I can tell, the only thing that connects Trump to the reality of his current job is his political support in the Senate. It is there that we must look to know how sound are his moorings.
#cofveve
This is the key takeaway. For now.
"We can't bust heads like we used to, but we have our ways. One trick is to tell 'em stories that don't go anywhere - like the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville. I needed a new heel for my shoe, so, I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. Give me five bees for a quarter, you'd say.
covfefe*
Yes.
All are my opinion, but mostly are historic facts. As noted, the election tampering remains unproven, though oft alleged. The basic and essential takeaway truth is that Kennedy was a flawed man who made determined enemies of very important constituencies who initially supported him. He was murdered and a whole lot of people thought he had it coming. His enemies included the Mafia, the CIA, and oilmen. At least some historians note that he was apparently making efforts to wind down the Vietnam conflict when other interests wanted it expanded.
Yep, apathy of the masses, that will solve all our issues.
You didnt specify a timeline on worse elected leader that's bad. At least a few dictators were elected officials before they turned dictator.
Most people, even those who politically support him, have a low opinion of Trump. He disturbs the feelings of many sensitive people in Seattle, I know that for a fact. But opinions and feelings aside, what is it that determines his future? Firstly, it is the House which determines the charges and impeaches, then the Senate that decides, and it must be by 67% or over. There is no appeal to a higher court. Should Trump survive impeachment as now seems likely, and then be renominated, it's down to the voters.
Well, glad you realized it, not my fault you didn't actualize it though. Like I tell my wife, I failed my mind reading class in college.
His croutons and dressing are fabulous.
The key worry about the impeachment path is that, should it fail, it may cause a backlash against the Democrats, as happened against the Republicans when their impeachment of Clinton failed. About our two-party system, it is flawed, and is made worse by corruption inflicted by lobbyists. However, it is well dug in, and what can change it I cannot imagine.
You might look into the impeachment of Andrew Johnson.
It's not so much a punishment for alleged activities* as it is a means to prevent future misuse of power.Rep. Thaddeus Stevens
If he's believed to have engaged in activities not befitting an individual of his station and there's no reason to believe he won't continue to do so, why should he be permitted to retain said station? If you believe he's engaged in this manner and don't support his removal, doesn't that make you, at least in part, party to that behavior?
Gonna need to define those who "feel" disadvantaged vs. those who are actually able to be classified as disadvantaged...
He disturbs the feelings of many sensible people. But I get it; leaning on the whole "snowflake" thing helps many a craven citizen feel that their self-interested politics don't actually cause that much harm to disadvantaged people.
