- 699
- Canada
- evilgloomy
Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC
- Thread starter daan
- 145,802 comments
- 43,203,813 views
- 5,683
- Belgium
I had no issues (but I disabled extended physics first).That is a new one.
Tested the car both in single and multiplayer and it was working fine. Except if extended physics were enabled, which you didnt do for sure.
Concerning the Michelin Banner, was this irl on the car? Couldnt find a picture with it.
After reading about the 'issue' I enabled the extended physics and the car started driving, spinning rear wheels in a cloud of smoke, while the fronts were not turning... so, yeah, disable extended physics as mentioned in the post and all is well.
- 6,958
- The Bunker
Probably something to do with the encryption. It works fine for me but maybe only local fixes work.
Or maybe the .txt extension borks it?
Hopefully the full update will fix it.
Maybe it's time to stop sharing these types of fixes, there's too many variables these days.
Last edited:
- 231
- Colombia
Hi! greetings for all!!! a new version of Tocancipa was released:
www.racedepartment.com
Autódromo de Tocancipá
Nueva versión del Autódromo de Tocancipá realizada por completo nuevamente desde cero en conjunto con mi amigo colombiano Daniel Jiménez, para la Asociación de Pilotos Virtuales Sudamericanos. Podes colaborar adquiriendo nuestros mod en nuestra...
www.racedepartment.com
- 634
- United Kingdom
You've pretty much summed up why I quit modding with that one sentence.
For me, that decision came at a time when new updates to CM / CSP broke things. I'd spend ages fixing or changing stuff, and then one update later, it was all broken again.
CM and CSP seem more stable now, but I'm not prepared to spend all that time modding if there's a chance it could get broken again.
And as you say, there are too many variables now. What works fine for one person might not work for someone else who is using a different version of CM or CSP, which inevitably leads to these queries.
- 517
- Italy
F1 Fictional Skin for Dijon + DRS by JV82
Compatibile with original conversion by Rainmaker and update version by by Assetto-fr.tk
I hope you like it!
LINK: https://www.mediafire.com/file/yn78...al+Skin+for+Dijon+++DRS+by+JV82+FINAL.7z/file
Compatibile with original conversion by Rainmaker and update version by by Assetto-fr.tk
I hope you like it!
LINK: https://www.mediafire.com/file/yn78...al+Skin+for+Dijon+++DRS+by+JV82+FINAL.7z/file
- 6,958
- The Bunker
A simple shifting animation should work though. I think it maybe can't be uploaded via the .txt workaround.
- 634
- United Kingdom
- 6,958
- The Bunker
I normally do but thought this might work.
Wrongly, it seems.
- 634
- United Kingdom
- 6,958
- The Bunker
Maybe. Not near my PC until tonight.
- 709
- Chad
hehe, any chance you kept the files?
- 699
- Canada
- evilgloomy
I was able to get the grip corrected, just couldn't add in the shift animation.
Just found this, GT Sport R34 GTR
- 89
- australia
- hotdogxx60
I've don't recall checking extended but it was ticked so I'll give it another go. That's what I get for not reading the bolded fine print.That is a new one.
Tested the car both in single and multiplayer and it was working fine. Except if extended physics were enabled, which you didnt do for sure.
Concerning the Michelin Banner, was this irl on the car? Couldnt find a picture with it.
- 877
- South Africa
You're on fire!
Always disappointing to find a really cool car, and then find it's encrypted, can't even make a decent preview, and delete it.
Oh well.
- 1,192
- Fiji
Is there a way to force SOL to use 2d clouds ? No matter what I do, it won't save in the config file when I hit 'save config' and quit the race.
I don't give a duck's bottom about 3D clouds or whatever. Maybe I should roll back to sol 2.0 ?
I don't give a duck's bottom about 3D clouds or whatever. Maybe I should roll back to sol 2.0 ?
- 27
- Sweden
Hello everyone!
I had this car from Rallyworld (updated by gr.team) and when I was testing it today I find out that it has some flaws. So I did some work on it and know I thinks its better than ever! So I was thinkin about to share it with all of you but I dont know if I allowed? Never done this before and it would be nice with some feedback if someone wants to try it
- 604
- Italy
Delete
Last edited:
- 6,333
- Ottawa
- Pyano1132
Just because a car is encrypted doesn't mean it's properly made. I dunno people, especially on the discord side, have all the sudden got this idea that anything with "encrypted" on it suddenly makes the contents therein this infallible, top-quality job.
Encrpyted mods can be made to work with CM showroom, the ones that don't I get rid of. Some people are into the photography side of AC as well as the driving aspects and mods that breaks themselves in the showroom are irritating for a lot of us.
- 604
- Italy
Delete
Last edited:
- 556
- Italy
Though really nowadays lately, a bunch of modders full of private mods rather prefer to just share photos they took of them instead of releasing them with properly made realistic physics and bunch of optimizations learnt from the pipeline, since I feel like most of those private ones are just all show and no go if someone were to somehow get one of them since they're badly optimized for driving in general surely, unlike say MNBA mods for example.
- 1,242
- Arrakis
Perhaps you could just share your modified data file? That shouldn't be a problem. 🙂View attachment 1098013
Hello everyone!
I had this car from Rallyworld (updated by gr.team) and when I was testing it today I find out that it has some flaws. So I did some work on it and know I thinks its better than ever! So I was thinkin about to share it with all of you but I dont know if I allowed? Never done this before and it would be nice with some feedback if someone wants to try it
- 2,333
- Helsinki
re: encryption
99.9 % of cars I have tried that were/are encrypted had bad physics to the point of being totally undriveable.
Garage queens only (in the bin!), which is fine because I have AC to drive a car with reasonable traits and characteristics of the model portrayed.
Encryption of tracks seems to be mostly limited to the Soyo/ek crew which are just rips of IDAS that anyone can pull from the arcade ROMS (as I have done as well).
Sega just might go after them, but who knows?
I almost forgot about that delicious cake on my table...
99.9 % of cars I have tried that were/are encrypted had bad physics to the point of being totally undriveable.
Garage queens only (in the bin!), which is fine because I have AC to drive a car with reasonable traits and characteristics of the model portrayed.
Encryption of tracks seems to be mostly limited to the Soyo/ek crew which are just rips of IDAS that anyone can pull from the arcade ROMS (as I have done as well).
Sega just might go after them, but who knows?
I almost forgot about that delicious cake on my table...
Last edited:
- 634
- United Kingdom
A bad mod is a bad mod and will get deleted. The encryption part is irrelevant.
Sure, it's frustrating if a mod is close to being good and can't be fixed because of encryption, but that's the choice that the mod's creator made - For their work to forever be 'close to being good' unless they update it.
Anyway, why are we talking about encryption again? Is it that time of the week already?
Sure, it's frustrating if a mod is close to being good and can't be fixed because of encryption, but that's the choice that the mod's creator made - For their work to forever be 'close to being good' unless they update it.
Anyway, why are we talking about encryption again? Is it that time of the week already?
Last edited:
- 84
- Australia
The issue is people always announcing their intentions for some reason. Like in this instance someone found a nice R34 and shared it with this community, rather than just saying thank you someone had to make a point about it being encrypted. If you don't like encrypted stuff just delete it from your game, it's pretty easy to do that, but no they had to announce it.
Also with that particular R34, I don't see any issues. It's got an accurate 3D model courtesy of GT Sport, well-made and well-researched physics which is considered accurate, good shader values, and proper skins with ext configs made to match them to real-world references. I mean what else do you want, it's a driving simulator and it checks all the boxes in this regard.
- 634
- United Kingdom
We can't police what other people do and I'm not going to pretend that we have the right to do that. The part in my post asking why we are talking about encryption again is more of a running joke around here.
My paragraph above is simply me voicing my own attitude toward encrypted mods.
Last edited:
- 92
- Austria
Has perhaps who of you skins for the Ferrenzo F07 since the RD unfortunately no longer fit since the model has changed slightly
Here is the original link https://www.racedepartment.com/downloads/f1-2007-vrc-skinpack.22215/
Here is the original link https://www.racedepartment.com/downloads/f1-2007-vrc-skinpack.22215/
- 360
- Slovenia
I never understood these choices....steal an encrypted model, make a mod (bad/good or half-done (preferably a kunos frankenstein with pasted kunos data)) and encrypt it again, so nobody can fix it or improve it.
Last edited:
Similar threads
