GTV0819
(Banned)
- 6,084
- Papua New Guinea
The power-to-weight ratio is truly outstanding.And only 1000kg.....
Think about that for a minute
The power-to-weight ratio is truly outstanding.And only 1000kg.....
Think about that for a minute
Im pretty sure you are going to have to give the F1 designer and league of world class enginners with years and years of experience and a half a decade of planning and designing the benefit of the doubt on this occasion.I'm pretty sure bigger brains than I have calculated this, but you do wonder if the V12 alone and the weight saved from cutting out the hybrid system will make the car even faster? I'd love to see one of the buyers comission a "pure" spec with just the ICE.
I'm pretty sure bigger brains than I have calculated this, but you do wonder if the V12 alone and the weight saved from cutting out the hybrid system will make the car even faster? I'd love to see one of the buyers comission a "pure" spec with just the ICE.
I think the Pro ‘track version’ is ICE only
Calibration changes to the 6.5-litre naturally-aspirated V12 engine’s emission control systems and re-programming of the Energy Recovery System control software will result in a combined power output of more than 1100bhp - more than the Valkyrie road car and a figure than comfortably exceeds the magic 1:1 power-to-weight ratio. That’s to say more than 1bhp to propel every kilogram of mass.
This thing is truly a contender for best car ever made for me. Just insane. I love everything this car stands for.
this car, I think that changes the rules... Of course, AMG ONE, SSC 003, Senna etc, have their merit too, but this... this is one step ahead.
I think the ONE is on the same league as this, the reason people at least here don't want to talk about it is that it looks too corporate at times and not as crazy and carefree as this car. The ONE is like a road car face of F1, while the Valkyrie is the face of every car fans wildest dreams.
Yes, you buy the Project One if your too fat to fit in the Valkyrie
If you're too fat for the Valkyrie you're too fat for the AMG One. Though I'm not sure you extrapolated that conclusion from my prior post.
Ha ha, maybe.
Both fantastic cars, the Valkyrie over 1 lap would be faster I am fairly sure.
Over a 6 hour race not so sure, would be quite a race which will probably never happen unfortunately.
Based on? Time will tell, the ONE is based on several proven championship race cars and is made for road use. The Valkyrie is made by aerodynamicist who had penned several championship race cars...
On paper the cars are pretty equal, with out much lapping seen or given officially by said groups it becomes a game of picking your favorite...which is pretty useless.
Based on what I think, please don’t take anything I say too seriously.
The Valkyrie will sound far better, therefore it will be faster.
Aston Martin seems super confident in the Valkyrie, enough for it to spawn 2 more "lower-end" cars and bring Aston Martin into the mid-engine supercar game.I agree the Valkyrie will probably be faster than AMG One. Power similar for both (~1000hp) and both have hybrid assist. Weight goes to Valkyrie. Downforce also goes to the Valkyrie. The only advantage AMG has is 4WD, but that will be negated by the Valkyrie's downforce in every situation except acceleration from walking speeds which you do not encounter often on a decent sized track.
The only car I can see in within a reach of the Valk is the new Koenigsegg Jesko (power advantage, but still loses on weight and aero), and even then it might need a track with lots of straights and not too many high speed corners.
Only time will tell. I hope Merc & Aston are both man enough to let the cars do the talking in a direct fight instead of lawsuits dictating the outcome.
Aston Martin seems super confident in the Valkyrie, enough for it to spawn 2 more "lower-end" cars and bring Aston Martin into the mid-engine supercar game.
I don't think Mercedes will hold anything back as well, but the faith in them isn't as high with Aston.
Well Aston has probably the best aerodynamicist in history working for them, and at this level of hypercars, aero grip is everything (mechanical grip is always going to be limited by road tyres). Merc has title winning engine, but in the grand scheme of things, 1000 HP hybrid engines are not that special anymore. The last crop of hypers (LaF, P1) are already knocking on that number, though admittedly with bigger displacement, more cylinders and less efficiency.
Regarding Aston's lower end MR supercars, personally I don't like their new direction. They all look too similar and risk cheapening the brand like McLaren now. The Valkyrie should be special and exist above and beyond all other Astons both in design and performance. I get that they want to compete with 488, 720S, Huracan but at least change up the design a little (DP-100 anyone?) and don't use the Vanquish name.
I wouldn't doubt the aero work of the Mercedes group especially considering it's the same group that has made 5 WDC winning cars, though it is funny this seems to be an argument that is seen in the F1 threads from GP to GP. Random person thinks: "RB probably has the best aero in the field but the Mercedes probably has the better overall package".
As for power Mercedes supposedly has about 100 more at full power than the Aston.
I don't doubt Merc's aero prowess either, but we're talking about road cars here not their F1 effort. One look at the AMG One and Valkyrie and you can tell which one is more extreme and uncompromising aero wise. Of course, until they publish official downforce figures this is all just speculation on our part.
Interesting about the power. From what I know current hybrid F1 engines tops out at 1000 hp and the one in AMG One is supposedly detuned. Whereas the Aston we know has 1160 hp combined.
I'm actually in agreement here. The 003 as a baby Valk? I can dig it. Potentially turning the Vanquish into that same style? Not a fan. The Valkyrie, imo, isn't exactly the prettier car in comparison to the One, but putting that it "works" feels tame for it's incredible design. The more they toned it down for the Vanquish Concept however, the more I would prefer a more traditional Aston approach.Regarding Aston's lower end MR supercars, personally I don't like their new direction. They all look too similar and risk cheapening the brand like McLaren now. The Valkyrie should be special and exist above and beyond all other Astons both in design and performance. I get that they want to compete with 488, 720S, Huracan but at least change up the design a little (DP-100 anyone?) and don't use the Vanquish name.
With cars like these the Aero is going to be more important in determining the faster car over power to weight anyway.We're talking about cars that are two steps away from being race cars, and we should be talking about the F1 effort because it's that effort that is putting these cars together in the first place. What I see is the standard Newey effort, a very tight package, and the Mercedes effort is taking again the corporate vision and putting it into a halo car with the F1 car underneath it.
The current F1 engines are pushing 1000+ and they've been able to reach this due to specialized fuels, top end work fueling systems in general and the hybrid unit changes they've continually developed. This is while still dealing with FIA restriction on the amount of boost, fuel flow, and rpm regulation. Which other than RPM doesn't have to be worried about with a road car that doesn't need to meet said restrictions. The numbers they've claimed for the the AMG One is 1250 hp and the Valkyrie is 1160, now this gets equalized when you compare weight, since the One is like 150-200 pounds heavier than than the Valkyrie.
With cars like these the Aero is going to be more important in determining the faster car over power to weight anyway.
The Mercedes will probably have the advantage since it's coming out later and they can make revisions based on what they see from the Valkrie.
Not when they are similar, there is no regs to adhere to so the gains from Aero is much more substantial then it would be from F1 or any racing series for example.Power to weight is still going to make quite the difference especially when aero is involved...
Not when they are similar, there is no regs to adhere to so the gains from Aero is much more substantial then it would be from F1 or any racing series for example.
The current F1 engines are pushing 1000+ and they've been able to reach this due to specialized fuels, top end work fueling systems in general and the hybrid unit changes they've continually developed. This is while still dealing with FIA restriction on the amount of boost, fuel flow, and rpm regulation. Which other than RPM doesn't have to be worried about with a road car that doesn't need to meet said restrictions. The numbers they've claimed for the the AMG One is 1250 hp and the Valkyrie is 1160, now this gets equalized when you compare weight, since the One is like 150-200 pounds heavier than than the Valkyrie.