Automezzi Colorado Pictures - June 3, 2007

  • Thread starter 1X83Z
  • 66 comments
  • 5,317 views
Guess I'd be alone then as I prefer the F50 more. I just sort of like its styling more.

Now's the part where I get shot down in flames, isn't it? :nervous:

I suppose I could see liking the F50 more but not in terms of styling. Ick!
 
Maybe in the front, but nowhere else.
Really? I see it in the side profile and 3/4 view too. The only major differences I can really tell aren't simply an evolution of the F50 design is the rear end, with the only similaraities there being the spoiler shape.
M5Power
I know where my $350,000 would be spent - to purchase an F40, not to put down on an F50.
Really? I'd buy a completely different supercar before I touched the 959.
M5Power
but I can't in good conscience say the F50 deserves to be placed ahead of either vehicle.
And I counter with the fact that the Enzo is ugly to the point of being offensive to nuns, and the F50 is simply blander than a Camry, and the 288GTO is pure beauty, but the slowest of them all. I'd rate the F40 ahead of the F50, but I still like the F50.
 
Really? I'd buy a completely different supercar before I touched the 959.

Yeah well you have weird tastes. My $350,000 wouldn't buy any of the aforementioned cars either - I was just stating that between the F40 and F50, I'd much rather buy the full F40 than some of the F50.
 
The 959 is weird taste? Ouch.
And I realise I screwed that sentence up, as it was supposed to say "
I'd buy a completely different supercar before I touched the F40."
 
The 959 is weird taste? Ouch.
And I realise I screwed that sentence up, as it was supposed to say "
I'd buy a completely different supercar before I touched the F40."

Oh - I took it as you wrote it, presuming you were talking about the Bugatti EB110. In this company, that is weird tastes.
 
Back