If i am not wrong, you are. Seeing how you kinda "worship" the RX-8. Please, do not get me wrong, i don't have anything against it, i am just asking.
Oh, I am not that obsessed with the Rx-8, if that was your concern. I just really like the way it drives, and how well it is set up. That's all, really.
I am going to quote you from an earlier post: "And then the ultimate irony; the fact that Mazda built it. Isn't it funny that the brand that Ford dumped like a random girlfriend created the same car that embarassed their sporty modern Focus? Mazda got left for dead, and then promptly created cars such as the new 2, 6 and the new MX-5; living proofs that natural aspiration and simple yet effectively fun driving aren't ready to drop the towel just yet." That's why i thought so
As for Ford and Mazda, that was an investment Ford made that worked quite well. It's hard to see the impact as a consumer, but for the enthusiast it was a win-win relationship while it lasted. Both parties got what they were after- Ford got quality, Mazda got SkyActive philosophy. I would've liked to see it last longer, but neither market would accept one owning the other. It's a cultural thing.
My only regret was that the Escort ZX2 wasn't in GT. The Focus replaced the ZX2, but the ZX2 was more fun. Way more fun.
A fair enough assessement, Mazda did get something out of their (short-lived) affair with Ford, if anything. They learned something, and one of my personal beliefs is that you can learn something from all experiences in life even if it might sound useless to others. For Mazda, they came out with a revitalized personality, for Ford, they got a much need leap in quality. Also, wasn't that ZX2 a FF coupe that was exclusive to 'Murican markets? I was always intrigued by its concept...
In the meantime, I already sent the car pick for next winner to its winner, just to warn you, Mcclaren.
Okay, i learned that the Mazda drives really well, which is actually true because it was the only car with that i was able to complete a seasonal for 500pp cars earlier this year.
In the meantime, I already sent the car pick for next winner to its winner, just to warn you, Mcclaren.
Not me.Who won, and what's the new car?
Who won, and what's the new car?
I know I've had my fill of both Japanese AND front drive cars as of late.
So I'm going with a car that I've nearly picked a couple of times before, that now gives us a much needed change of pace from weeks of hatchbacks. Our next car of the week....
There is a Hommel in here. Look behind the girl's booty. It's there. No, really, it is.
Well, the booty is definitely in there, but the Hommell is a bit... different. That would be one of the older models, with different headlights, and taillights from a Citroen ZX. Because reasons. But it is a good attempt, not denying that. But I wonder if you can find a 1999 Berlinette with a sexy girl next to it...
Yea I know....How about this? I think that's a girl on the left. Does she have to be sexy?
There is a Hommel in here. Look behind the girl's booty. It's there. No, really, it is.
Trying too hard.Yea I know....How about this? I think that's a girl on the left. Does she have to be sexy?
One of my favorite parts of living here. Glad you like it too.Hate to say it, but expect me to miss next Tuesday's races as well. I'll likely be on my way home by then, though.
Thank you all for your support and well-wishes.
On a brighter note, I highly recommend driving in Los Angeles. The traffic is heavy, but I've never been more challenged and fulfilled as a drive. F whatcha heard, driving is fun here. It allows you the chance to legally push your car and yourself to the limit.
Very addictive.
Hommell Berlinette R/S Coupe '99
2.0L
163 hp / 6,500 rpm
145 ft-lb / 5,500 rpm
950 kg (2,094 lbs)
395 pp
Cars within +/- half a second at Mid-Field on CS tires:
1:26.816 - 433 - Honda Mugen Motul Civic Si '87
1:26.850 - 415 - Spoon Integra Type R (DC2) '99
1:26.876 - 408 - Lotus Elise '96
1:26.920 - 438 - Subaru Legacy B4 Blitzen '00
1:26.931 - 438 - Toyota Aristo V300 '00
1:26.948 - 429 - Ford Focus ST '13
1:26.975 - 403 - Opel Speedster '00
1:27.183 - 428 - SRT SRT4 '03
1:27.237 - 434 - Toyota Supra 2.5GT Twin Turbo R '90
1:27.309 - 395 - Hommell Berlinette R/S Coupe '99
1:27.342 - 423 - Alfa Romeo GT 3.2 V6 24V '04
1:27.363 - 410 - Mercedes Benz 190 E 2.5 - 16 Evolution II '91
1:27.368 - 431 - Mitsubishi Eclipse GT '06
1:27.406 - 408 - Peugeot 205 Turbo 16 '85
1:27.444 - 428 - Audi S4 '98
1:27.460 - 417 - Chrysler Crossfire '04
1:27.530 - 414 - Honda Civic Type R '08
1:27.539 - 414 - Honda Civic Type R (EP) '04
1:27.572 - 410 - Honda Integra Type R (DC2) '99
1:27.603 - 434 - Toyota Aristo 3.0V '91
1:27.613 - 439 - Mazda Mazdaspeed Atenza '05
1:27.762 - 433 - Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III GSR '95
1:27.790 - 428 - Volkswagen Golf VI R '10
1:27.802 - 429 - Toyota Supra 3.0GT Turbo A '88
If you look closely, you'll see last weeks' Focus ST in the list
MR Competition:
1:26.876 - 408 - Lotus Elise '96
1:26.975 - 403 - Opel Speedster '00
1:27.309 - 395 - Hommell Berlinette R/S Coupe '99
1:27.991 - 404 - Toyota MR2 G-Limited '97
1:28.224 - 411 - Lotus Elise '00
1:29.592 - 378 - Toyota MR2 Spyder (6MT) '02
1:30.887 - 376 - Toyota MR2 Spyder '99
It's hard to beat the first-gen Elise, but the Opel comes very close. The MR2 Spyder is too slow to be a competitor, but the 2nd gen MR2 certainly is not, with the Elise '00 treading on that cars' heels.
At 395 pp, the Berlinette is the fastest car under 400 pp at Mid-Field. The second-fastest car under 400 pp is the Toyota Altezza RS200 '98 which is 1.2 seconds slower and has 396 pp.
The car requires a lot of concentration mid-corner, as is typical with MR cars. I can't say I'm fond of its exterior design when compared next to the Opel or Lotus, but it does look fast. I'll call it a beater since I'd rather say I own a first-gen Lotus Elise than a Hommell.
Only reason I didn't include the Speedster Turbo (or MR2 Turbo for that matter) are because it would be unfair to pit a turbo car against a non-turbo car. Now if the Hommell RS2 were in the game, that car would definitely be compared with turbo cars, since it has almost 200 hp.
Apparently they only made 200 Berlinettes in total, and 56 were RS2's...
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/hommell-berlinette-rs2-and-vaillante-1650060405
I'm just a Lotus kind of guy.
Fair enough, I can understand that. You do seem to like Lotus quite a lot, and it's easy to see why. Very few cars can match the driving feel of an Elise, and that is why the Speedster managed to be so good; because underneath lie quite a few Elise parts...
As for the Hommell, you also reminded me of its other identity;
Ze Vaillante Grand Défi. A very interesting car, I bet it must be a riot to drive one...
I'll be honest, I thought that car was from the Ridge Racer series going by the name and race livery.
It probably is a riot to drive, 150kg lighter than the standard Hommel with around 150hp on tap sounds like good fun.
As for the one we have, the RS, a full weight reduction can make it 20kg lighter than the Vaillante and fully tuned can make 357hp.
@SuzukaStar shakedown laps say it has sleeper potential by punching above its sub 400PP level, how will it drive in the hands of the COTW racers?
Tune in on Tuesday at 10PM CST to find out.
(Message @McClarenDesign on PSN if you want to join.)
Also, when did you become COTW's promotional figure? You sound like one of those vacum cleaner sellers...
Probably since he got bored with all of us and trying to bring in some new blood. I think @Vic Reign93 has quit trying and wants a challenge.
It's one of those "aching for a fight" sort of situations, eh?
Well bringing in new blood is all great, but getting bored with you guys?
Never, not in a million years.
If every week I was shutting out the whole grid by over a minute then I would probably agree, but that isn't and won't be the case.
Believe me, you guys are getting quicker. 👍