Best Music of Modern TimesMusic 

  • Thread starter Alex.
  • 57 comments
  • 2,963 views
Nobody has said Imagine Dragons!?

They had a concert back in June last year in Nashville, and I thought they were amazing.

And on April 5th, they will have a concert at Interlagos, seems pretty cool. đź‘Ť
 
I'm just trying to understand on what grounds these groups or people will be classics I mean if we're going to talk about this it would probably be best to do so on an intellectual basis. What do these groups offer that are anywhere close to classics of the past? I mean when you talk about classics like say Queen for instance or Elton John or David Bowie, that are pop and rock and other genres these people being listed don't really come close, they're making and selling quick music to a mass of people that couldn't care less what's beyond their radio. Some of these pop musicians I'd agree are actually worth the effort and could be on level with a Michael Jackson and so on, like as mentioned Bruno Mars.

However, when you put out people who are constantly contractually obligated to churn out records nearly every other year if not every year I just don't see how. Some of these names are more busy with their image or grabbing headlines to make something memorable for anything longer than the hour needed to sell it. I mean boy bands sold tons of records like some of these artist today, but I'd hardly call anything they did classic or something that will be on classic stations 50 years from now.

Also what about John Legend? Not my type of singer but actually has classic feel to him. Or a band that I actually like, Black Keys which probably have catchy yet classic music that will probably keep playing like other bands from decades ago.
 



These guys were around in the 80s, but the band itself didn't form until the late 90s. Amazing music they make.
 
The ones who are already on the path to legendhood in my eyes:

Imagine Dragons
Lorde
Bastille
Ed Sheeran (As a songwriter, at the very least)
Muse (They're already there though, really)



Some who I feel deserve it, yet haven't yet clinched popularity in a massive way:

Swim Deep:


Nina Nesbitt:


Kodaline:


Patterns:


Kitten:
(FIFA players will recognise this, I'd recommend looking further into their music if you do!)
 
I'm just trying to understand on what grounds these groups or people will be classics I mean if we're going to talk about this it would probably be best to do so on an intellectual basis. What do these groups offer that are anywhere close to classics of the past? I mean when you talk about classics like say Queen for instance or Elton John or David Bowie, that are pop and rock and other genres these people being listed don't really come close, they're making and selling quick music to a mass of people that couldn't care less what's beyond their radio. Some of these pop musicians I'd agree are actually worth the effort and could be on level with a Michael Jackson and so on, like as mentioned Bruno Mars.

However, when you put out people who are constantly contractually obligated to churn out records nearly every other year if not every year I just don't see how. Some of these names are more busy with their image or grabbing headlines to make something memorable for anything longer than the hour needed to sell it. I mean boy bands sold tons of records like some of these artist today, but I'd hardly call anything they did classic or something that will be on classic stations 50 years from now.

Also what about John Legend? Not my type of singer but actually has classic feel to him. Or a band that I actually like, Black Keys which probably have catchy yet classic music that will probably keep playing like other bands from decades ago.
Have to agree. Lots of the bands in the current era seem to be nothing but a few one hit wonders before replaced by the next big thing. Good, but not the best because it won't be remembered as anything else but said one hit wonder where the only people who remember it vividly are those who lived during its time. In short, us, while our 18-year old kids go, "Eww... what the hell is that?".


In other words, best music of the modern times are the songs that live on like your examples: Queen & Elton John, instantly recognizable by young & old. I think Bruno Mars could be one of those artists since he's already made it 8 years as a musician and still relevant with a number of hits. Pharrell Williams' Happy will no doubt make that cut, but then again, most people don't realize Pharrell has been around since around 2 decades, or that he's 41. I attribute that as to why Get Lucky will also likely be a classic; all 3 artists are well established. John Legend is someone we'll have to wait and see. He's been around for a decade & going, but he hasn't really had many hits to solidify himself besides All of Me. It actually took that song for me to remember Green Light & Ordinary People, or that both those songs are now 6 & 9 years old respectively. Has he really had any other hits besides those, curiously? 2 other mentions in this thread such as Muse & Coldplay are ones I hold in regard to Daft Punk & Pharrell Williams. They have technically been around a long time by music standards, but they didn't hit the ground running til' early 2000's & have really built steam going into this era.

There's a couple Queens of the Stone Age nominations, but I don't really follow them, so I don't know if they gained popularity in this era, or if they hit it off during the mid 90's. The Radiohead mention though, is the same as Slash's below; the band is 20 years old & hit success in the early-mid 90's. Unless they have drastically changed from what made them famous then & now, I don't see them as pioneers of the music in the modern era.

These other mentions however such as The Killers, Snow Patrol, Neon Trees might as well be equivalent of Blondie, Culture Club, Soft Cell, Tears For Fears, and so forth. They likely won't actually stand the test of time beyond a couple hits that become the sole reason we even mention them & our kids look them up out of curiosity as the same reason many of us probably looked up my 80's examples. Franz Ferdinand is a perfect candidate for this group; have they really contributed anything that could be seen as the best music of the modern era beyond Take Me Out?

Slash's Iron Maiden mention for Best music of the modern era isn't a candidate because it's not modern. It's a 70's rock band that continues to play the style they are known for, 80's metal that has adapted over time without losing its defining sound. This isn't a bad thing as I like Iron Maiden & I'm glad they avoided what split Metallica's fans apart. But they're nowhere as relevant as they used to be because of how they continue to write music & thus, are nowhere near music of the modern era. They are the same as Motley Crue, Buckcherry, & Red Hot Chili Peppers, they are playing the music of the eras that will induct them into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame.
The ones who are already on the path to legendhood in my eyes:

Imagine Dragons
Lorde
Bastille
Ed Sheeran (As a songwriter, at the very least)
Muse (They're already there though, really)
I'm not sure how any of these artists are on the way to "legendhood" beyond Muse.
Imagine Dragons has only produced 1 studio album despite being 6 years old as a band, and they only have 2 major hits, 3 if you can remember It's Time being completely overshadowed by the other 2.
Lorde & Bastille are incredibly young by music standards. Lorde is a 17 year old who gained music fame just last year off 2 hits, Royals & Team. Bastille is the same, 1 album (2 if you want to count a re-release of the first) with 1 major hit from Pompeii, and 2 if Bad Blood catches on.

It's far, far too early to see if these 3 are on their way to becoming legendary. They could just as easily be a few one-hit wonders & fall off the charts in 2-3 years time.

Ed Sheeran is one I'll wait & see. He's somewhat like John Legend, been around a while, but really only known for a couple hits in that time. Even Don Johnson & Steve Perry managed that.
 
Last edited:
Have to agree. Lots of the bands in the current era seem to be nothing but a few one hit wonders before replaced by the next big thing. Good, but not the best because it won't be remembered as anything else but said one hit wonder where the only people who remember it vividly are those who lived during its time. In short, us, while our 18-year old kids go, "Eww... what the hell is that?".


In other words, best music of the modern times are the songs that live on like your examples: Queen & Elton John, instantly recognizable by young & old. I think Bruno Mars could be one of those artists since he's already made it 8 years as a musician and still relevant with a number of hits. Pharrell Williams' Happy will no doubt make that cut, but then again, most people don't realize Pharrell has been around since around 2 decades, or that he's 41. I attribute that as to why Get Lucky will also likely be a classic; all 3 are well established. John Legend is someone we'll have to wait and see. He's been around for a decade & going, but he hasn't really had many hits to solidify himself besides All of Me. It actually took that song for me to remember Green Light & Ordinary People, or that both those songs are now 6 & 9 years old respectively. Has he really had any other hits besides those, curiously? 2 other mentions in this thread such as Muse & Coldplay are ones I hold in regard to Daft Punk & Pharrell Williams. They have technically been around a long time by music standards, but they didn't hit the ground running til' early 2000's & have really built steam going into this era.

These other mentions however such as The Killers, Snow Patrol, Neon Trees might as well be equivalent of Blondie, Culture Club, Soft Cell, Tears For Fears, and so forth. They likely won't actually stand the test of time beyond a couple hits that become the sole reason we even mention them & our kids look them up out of curiosity as the same reason many of us probably looked up my 80's examples. Franz Ferdinand is a perfect candidate for this group; have they really contributed anything that could be seen as the best music of the modern era beyond Take Me Out?

Slash's Iron Maiden mention is not a candidate for Best music of the modern era because it's not modern. It's a 70's rock band that continues to play the style they are known for, 80's metal that has adapted over time without losing its defining sound. This isn't a bad thing as I like Iron Maiden & I'm glad they avoided what split Metallica's fans apart. But they're nowhere as relevant as they used to be because of how they continue to write music & thus, are nowhere near music of the modern era. They are the same as Motley Crue, Buckcherry, & Red Hot Chili Peppers, they are playing the music of the eras that will induct them into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame.

I would easily say that RHCP and Coldplay are ready or already on newer age classic stations. I'm a massive RHCP fan and have their book signed by them (sadly I don't have Frusciante my favorite guitarists signature on it) and I've yet to meet someone that has never heard Under the Bridge or Californication and even some of their newer stuff.

I have to agree with everything else you've stated as well. Though I do see one issue, and it's usually and issue I see with these type of things and it's probably that of cultured taste. People who know music and expand to all areas of it (which I do) tend to seem like a better judge of what will last the test of time, rather than those who are just getting their radio fix. That's not to say that all radio music that is commercially broadcast is bad, many of my favorite bands and musicians have popular singles from now or in the past but the majority that is talked about (due to antics) are the ones I wouldn't expect to see.

Beiber, Minaj, Perry, Gaga and so on...
 
I would easily say that RHCP and Coldplay are ready or already on newer age classic stations. I'm a massive RHCP fan and have their book signed by them (sadly I don't have Frusciante my favorite guitarists signature on it) and I've yet to meet someone that has never heard Under the Bridge or Californication and even some of their newer stuff.

I have to agree with everything else you've stated as well. Though I do see one issue, and it's usually and issue I see with these type of things and it's probably that of cultured taste. People who know music and expand to all areas of it (which I do) tend to seem like a better judge of what will last the test of time, rather than those who are just getting their radio fix. That's not to say that all radio music that is commercially broadcast is bad, many of my favorite bands and musicians have popular singles from now or in the past but the majority that is talked about (due to antics) are the ones I wouldn't expect to see.

Beiber, Minaj, Perry, Gaga and so on...
Beiber is the equivalent of Vanilla Ice, I'll call it now. We'll see his career re-blossom making cable reality shows about things we'd never expect him in. :P I think Perry could really push herself as a classic artist, though if she continues. She's gotten better over time, imo, and she's definitely experimenting with her music more & more. She cites Madonna as an influence & I can honestly see her as the next "Madonna" in a way since she is the leading female pop artist tmk.

Lady Gaga, I couldn't judge. She stays relevant, but it's coin toss between her music & her outfits.
 
Beiber is the equivalent of Vanilla Ice, I'll call it now. We'll see his career re-blossom making cable reality shows about things we'd never expect him in. :P I think Perry could really push herself as a classic artist, though if she continues. She's gotten better over time, imo, and she's definitely experimenting with her music more & more. She cites Madonna as an influence & I can honestly see her as the next "Madonna" in a way since she is the leading female pop artist tmk.

Lady Gaga, I couldn't judge. She stays relevant, but it's coin toss between her music & her outfits.

Yeah, I guess when I think of female artist that are going to be instant classics Adele is usually the only one that really comes to mind. I think I don't give Perry much credit because of the Madonna thing and not being a fan of her music, but Perry could surprise me in a way Madonna never could or would.
 
For pop/electronic music I'd say Daft Punk have earned their place in history, there on par with greats like Jean Michael Jarre and Kraftwerk.

Air also fit the above, as they have had multiple albums all we'll received. Boards Of Canada, Moogwai, Maximo Park, Bjork.

The problem with a lot of music is as it's always been done and that's massed produced, that's not so much an issue if you have a group with charm and charisma but there are too many bands that are all studio stooges and they show it and haven't a single ounce of like-ability.

I think this comes from studios rushing to make cash as quickly as possible and once the sales dip they are dropped like a sack of potatoes. The only hope for them to carry on making money then is to star in a soap or adverts etc.

But I don't let this stop me from listening to new artists. On the contrary; I've recently been listening to Kate Rusby and just found Daniela Andrade...



 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how any of these artists are on the way to "legendhood" beyond Muse.
Imagine Dragons has only produced 1 studio album despite being 6 years old as a band, and they only have 2 major hits, 3 if you can remember It's Time being completely overshadowed by the other 2.
Lorde & Bastille are incredibly young by music standards. Lorde is a 17 year old who gained music fame just last year off 2 hits, Royals & Team. Bastille is the same, 1 album (2 if you want to count a re-release of the first) with 1 major hit from Pompeii, and 2 if Bad Blood catches on.

It's far, far too early to see if these 3 are on their way to becoming legendary. They could just as easily be a few one-hit wonders & fall off the charts in 2-3 years time.

Ed Sheeran is one I'll wait & see. He's somewhat like John Legend, been around a while, but really only known for a couple hits in that time. Even Don Johnson & Steve Perry managed that.

Yeah, what I meant is I believe those bands COULD go far in terms of mainstream success if the momentum they have now is built upon/remains as it is. I'm fairly sure Lorde is a shoe-in if they (the label)can release a strong third single and release a strong sophomore towards the end of this year or maybe the summer of 2015.

Imagine Dragons are well on their way, I think. They've actually done a little better in the US, but they are very popular over here as well. Once again, if they can build on what they've done so far with a second album in the next 18 months or so, and continue the 'live band' reputation they're building, they'll do good.

Ed will be in the same position, it all depends on how the 'difficult second album' does. He could become the British Ryan Tedder or Pharrell Williams, maybe.

Anyway, you're quite right, I mis-phrased my original post. I meant to create a list of rather well known musicians who could/should reach the top, and also a list of some (slightly) less well known ones, too. I think we're working with different stats though, in the UK at least, I'm *half* sure that Bastille have had three or four 'big ones'. Probably wrong though.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, what I meant is I believe those bands COULD go far in terms of mainstream success if the momentum they have now is built upon/remains as it is. I'm fairly sure Lorde is a shoe-in if they (the label)can release a strong third single and release a strong sophomore towards the end of this year or maybe the summer of 2015.
I think time needs to be factored in as well. Rick Astley had a couple hits & a few albums, but even before Rick Rolling became a thing, his only hit is still the one we all know and love/hate. I'd have to see Lorde release a couple more albums/hits & remain relevant in another 3-4 years. Just far too early, imo, to judge her as someone like Muse that have cemented their place in this era.
Imagine Dragons are well on their way, I think. They've actually done a little better in the US, but they are very popular over here as well. Once again, if they can build on what they've done so far with a second album in the next 18 months or so, and continue the 'live band' reputation they're building, they'll do good.
Further than Lorde, but again, I'd have to come back to them in a couple years. Lots of bands do well now for a few songs, but they fail to actually produce anymore than 2 or 3 that can make them be remembered after the next big thing comes along. For now, it's coin flip. They could become Muse or they could become Foster the People.
Ed will be in the same position, it all depends on how the 'difficult second album' does. He could become the British Ryan Tedder or Pharrell Williams, maybe.
The A-Team is 3 years old and still receives play time (well, less now that Sing is out) which is a good sign because it has kept the song popular with folks. If Sing & whatever his future third hit single are still being played 3 years later after their release, I think he'll become one of the best modern artists. He's further along than most. đź‘Ť
Anyway, you're quite right, I mis-phrased my original post. I meant to create a list of rather well known musicians who could/should reach the top, and also a list of some (slightly) less well known ones, too. I think we're working with different stats though, in the UK at least, I'm *half* sure that Bastille have had three or four 'big ones'. Probably wrong though.
Probably right. I'm judging by what I've heard in the US obviously, & I think these artists just need a few more years, more hits, & prove they're not going to fall off the radar.
 
Muse and possibly Queens of the Stone Age is all I can really think of (although my narrow range of music isn't really helping). There are a few people I can think of, but they are either one hit wonders, or infamously pop like.
 
Nobody has said Imagine Dragons!?

They had a concert back in June last year in Nashville, and I thought they were amazing.

And on April 5th, they will have a concert at Interlagos, seems pretty cool. đź‘Ť


They're pretty flavour of the month kind of band I think. Wouldn't be surprised if no one knows who they are in 7-10 years.
 
The Strokes

At this point, they have more crap albums than good ones in their lineup.

I think Beck will stand the test of time; he's such a sonic chameleon, but I've always been consistently impressed with his music. Beastie Boys are a bit too old to really nominate, as their best stuff is older, but their impact on the genre is inarguable. Radiohead has managed to hold on to their title as "Most Underrated Overrated band" ;), and I really believe the National will achieve a similar sort of reputation, if they haven't already. LCD Soundsystem is a personal favourite, and I think now that they've disbanded, their fanbase will only get bigger, since they've pulled that trick of stopping right as things are at their best.

Oh, and hate him we might, but Justin Timberlake has absolutely made the right choices in this century.
 
Definitely agree about Beck but he's been around too long to be called recent times.
 
I always thought Beck was really underrated as a musician. I've never really seen many people talk about him, & I rarely hear any of his works even on satellite radio. I wonder if it's due to his long career & that most of his hits were in the 90's.
 
So most of us here agree regarding Daft Punk- Muse - Coldplay

would nominate Linkin Park and if they do make a comeback Pendulum.

As a Pendulum fan who has listened to more than just Witchcraft, doesn't despise that electrohouse duo and doesn't make creepy fan-art I wholeheartedly concur with this statement đź‘Ť

Seriously though, they got the ravers rocking and the rockers raving. Quite an achievement I reckon...
 
As a Pendulum fan who has listened to more than just Witchcraft, doesn't despise that electrohouse duo and doesn't make creepy fan-art I wholeheartedly concur with this statement đź‘Ť

Seriously though, they got the ravers rocking and the rockers raving. Quite an achievement I reckon...

They're the best at what they do in my opinion, almost all their tracks are fantastic. I'd nominate Knife Party but they're still new and that genre isn't that popular yet I think.
 
The Radiohead mention though, is the same as Slash's below; the band is 20 years old & hit success in the early-mid 90's. Unless they have drastically changed from what made them famous then & now, I don't see them as pioneers of the music in the modern era.

They've changed a lot since Pablo Honey/The Bends/OK Computer. They threw quite a curve ball with Kid A/Amnesiac (the former regarded as one of the top albums of the 00's) and then they further surprised everyone with In Rainbows being released with a pay what you want system (the album was universally acclaimed and it also won a Grammy that year). Pretty much every soft rock/indie band from the last 15 years has been influenced by them, Muse and Coldplay were constantly being compared to them when they started making waves.

As for another name to consider, I think Kendrick Lamar will be considered as one of the greats. Good Kid Maad City is already seen as one of hip hop's finest albums.
 
I know they've been brought up before, but Queens of the Stone Age is an amazing band. ... Like Clockwork is only two albums I've bought that came out in the past few years, and the other one was from an artist who's 71 years old now.
 
So most of us here agree regarding Daft Punk- Muse - Coldplay

would nominate Linkin Park and if they do make a comeback Pendulum.

I wouldn't necessarily agree on Coldplay, not to sound hipster but they really sold out there sound when the other two actually grew and went in a upward direction. Now I'm not asking for Coldplay to sound or kept sounding like Radiohead, but Muse broke out of that mold quite nicely. Coldplay I feel had something different after their first two small albums and up to Viva la and after lost it and rather decided instead of being different they'd lend their back drops to other popular artist. Thus getting play time and obviously monetary value but not real artist value.

Though this is funny because it will probably be what helps them be remembered to an extent, then Clocks will be played all the time and people will keep remembering them.

Linkin Park did exactly what Coldplay did but to a worse extent all while saying the major studio screwed them over. But that's just me
I know they've been brought up before, but Queens of the Stone Age is an amazing band. ... Like Clockwork is only two albums I've bought that came out in the past few years, and the other one was from an artist who's 71 years old now.

Also Like Clockwork had Elton John :sly:. I personally want QOTSA to be remembered forever because they are a great band but I don't know if they will be due to not having nearly a following as some of the others named here. Arctic Monkeys are another one I'd love to see be remembered but I have doubts they will be anywhere outside UK

They've changed a lot since Pablo Honey/The Bends/OK Computer. They threw quite a curve ball with Kid A/Amnesiac (the former regarded as one of the top albums of the 00's) and then they further surprised everyone with In Rainbows being released with a pay what you want system (the album was universally acclaimed and it also won a Grammy that year). Pretty much every soft rock/indie band from the last 15 years has been influenced by them, Muse and Coldplay were constantly being compared to them when they started making waves.

As for another name to consider, I think Kendrick Lamar will be considered as one of the greats. Good Kid Maad City is already seen as one of hip hop's finest albums.

If it weren't for one or two I'd say that Good Kid Maad City is up there with Illmatic and other great rap albums. I think Kendrick is great but I don't want to see him fade out in exchange for easy music to sell.
 
Last edited:
If we consider modern music bands from 2000 onwards:
-Black Keys
-Alt-J
-Django Django
-Imagine Dragons
-Tame Impala
-Of Monsters and Man

If we look on the 90's
-Muse
-Daft Punk
-Coldplay
-QOTSA
-Foo Fighters

If we look for comebacks
-Pendulum
-Wolfmother

These are my list for Rock/Pop Rock/electronic bands that, in my mind, can easily earn their place in history. Some are there or half there.
 
Back