Id doubt that, maximum braking could possibly be achieved with a 2:1 setting, if the brakes are at the point just before they lock up.
10:10 would certainly lock the brakes (definetely the back as it has less of a load on the rear than the front under braking).
Ill use some random numbers to illustrate my point.
A ratio of 3:1 could provide maximum braking under 100% brake pedal depression, which is good, occasionally you'll want this. So that gives you the full movement of the pedal to choose the right amount of braking, alot more room for different levels of braking.
However, a ratio of 9:3 might only give maximum braking with 33% brake pedal depression, which means you have much less movement of the pedal to control differing brake levels.
Im not sure that a 9 is 3 times stronger than a 3 on the "strength" of the brakes. I don't think the difference is that big, but I hope you get what im trying to say.
Important: try not to brake when the car is turning. IF the problem continues:
Reduce the braking pressure in the LSD (form 20 to 14 for example), and a braking balance, for example, 6/4. (If it oversteers, usually more brake in the front).
The rest is practice.
I started the thread with stock cars in mind i.e. no LSD to mess with.
I am just trying to understand the logic of how this thing works without involving any other extra tuning upgrades/settings.
Basically you can set the amount of brake force applied to the front and rear tyres.
Eg. 6:4 is 60%/40% to the front and rear. Naturally 10/10 is never the answer as the wheels will just lock up and as I said before the best braking happens when the wheel are on the edge of locking up.
The object of changing is to ensure that all tyres are doing the same "amount" of braking, as you get the most stopping force when the tyres are on the edge of grip. But, this would depend on the weight distribution of the car itself, this weight distribution does change under braking as it transfers forward under braking.
Generally, a little more brake bias towards the front is the answer as the load under braking will be higher on the front so to ensure all brakes are doing the same amount of "work" thats the answer.
So to sum up, more bias on the front is usually the answer, so that all wheels will be doing maximum amount of braking they can before locking up. However you will need to fiddle with this as the front wheels will usually be the first to lock up and you will loose steering. More bias to the back will lock the rear wheels and the back end will move out.
Try not to use brake bias for inducing oversteer though, there are far better ways of doing that and it usually increases your braking distances on the whole.
Does a higher number indeed mean stronger brakes or are the numbers just relavent to each other for balance? Meaning that 3/3 is the same as 5/5 or 10/10. And 10/1 would be the most balance difference you could apply.
This is a great thread. Can somebody also clarify the impact of Braking Sensitivity in LSD upon braking strength and the relationship between these?
Sheer
Basically you can set the amount of brake force applied to the front and rear tyres.
Eg. 6:4 is 60%/40% to the front and rear.
This is a great thread. Can somebody also clarify the impact of Braking Sensitivity in LSD upon braking strength and the relationship between these?
Sheer
That doesnt make any sense. Valid brake force entries must total 100%, like 5/5, 6/4, 4/6, 8/2, 2/8 etc.
Is this a wrong assumption?