Supafly_001
(Banned)
- 295
- Nova Scotia
- PM me
CARS FULL HP thread
- Thread starter kingking
- 310 comments
- 28,202 views
- 231
- Englewood/OH/US
- MBAR44
Ford Mustang GT '07 784; Mustang GT '05 804; Lightning 796 ; Mercury Cougar 843.
Mach 1 '71 789. Chrysler 300C '05 836; Charger 440 R/T '70 842; Pontiac GTO '64 794; Cuda 440 Six Pack '71 886; Chevelle SS 454 '70 877; Plymouth XNR GHIA '60 525;
Subaru WRX STi Spec C RA '05 571. WRX STi '07 (I only get 569 hp); WRX STi Spec C '09 576; Impreza Sedan WRX STi '10 565; Subaru S206 NBR Challenge Package '12 634. Mitsubishi Evo VIII RS '03 579. Evo X GSR PP '07 590; Mitsu GTO Twin Turbo '98 944. Impreza 22B '98 609.
Mach 1 '71 789. Chrysler 300C '05 836; Charger 440 R/T '70 842; Pontiac GTO '64 794; Cuda 440 Six Pack '71 886; Chevelle SS 454 '70 877; Plymouth XNR GHIA '60 525;
Subaru WRX STi Spec C RA '05 571. WRX STi '07 (I only get 569 hp); WRX STi Spec C '09 576; Impreza Sedan WRX STi '10 565; Subaru S206 NBR Challenge Package '12 634. Mitsubishi Evo VIII RS '03 579. Evo X GSR PP '07 590; Mitsu GTO Twin Turbo '98 944. Impreza 22B '98 609.
Last edited:
- 520
- Kansas
- x3SGTEx
Nothing important to cram in but as a *note* I was on v1.00 for the longest time while this thread was going on.
I had a couple cars broken in and some only with the oil change. Back on v1.00 cars were like gt5 needing 186 miles to be broken in.
I'm now on v1.02 and those same cars regardless oil change or being at or past 186 have the same hp now.
I know this had been discussed before but I don't think anyone was fully aware what was going on between v1.00,.01,.02.
I had a couple cars broken in and some only with the oil change. Back on v1.00 cars were like gt5 needing 186 miles to be broken in.
I'm now on v1.02 and those same cars regardless oil change or being at or past 186 have the same hp now.
I know this had been discussed before but I don't think anyone was fully aware what was going on between v1.00,.01,.02.
- 1,942
- florida
- kttheman001
- 231
- Englewood/OH/US
- MBAR44
I'm not sure what happened with my GT-R R35 TC. I took it to test track with 1051 HP. Ran it a couple times and it was at 1049 HP. Checked mileage and it had 211 miles. Went back to change oil and now has 1059HP. Does anyone know what the max is supposed to be? I'm curious if breaking in cars is still necessary.
- 699
- LA
- thrasher0422
- thrasher0422
what update are you on?
- 231
- Englewood/OH/US
- MBAR44
I'm on 1.02. Okay nevermind. I just bought a new GT-R R35 TC and did full upgrade with oil change and it has 1059 HP. My other one just lost ten horsepower from the 200+ miles before I changed the oil in it.
Last edited:
Danny280zxturbo
(Banned)
- 2,365
- Diriamba/Miami
- Danny280zxturbo
Kingking, make these updates: civic 08 418hp n EK98 400hp.
I will next week after holidays.
Supafly_001
(Banned)
- 295
- Nova Scotia
- PM me
- 63
- holland
- TRANIX74
It would be nice if someone made a power to weight thread since pd made this a big deal in gt6..yeah i know im to lazy to do it my self
Danny280zxturbo
(Banned)
- 2,365
- Diriamba/Miami
- Danny280zxturbo
Kingking, Ill post these again, just incase you forgot bro...
Honda Civic 08, 418HP "with stage 2" motor
Honda Prelude Type S 96, 427HP.
Mitsubishi EVO VIII RS 03, 579HP.
Honda EK 98, 400HP
Honda DC5 03 467HP
Renault clio 02 381HP
Buick GNX 87 688HP
Please don't forget to update these cars bro..Thanks..
Honda Civic 08, 418HP "with stage 2" motor
Honda Prelude Type S 96, 427HP.
Mitsubishi EVO VIII RS 03, 579HP.
Honda EK 98, 400HP
Honda DC5 03 467HP
Renault clio 02 381HP
Buick GNX 87 688HP
Please don't forget to update these cars bro..Thanks..
Last edited:
dr_slump
Premium
- 7,425
- Switzerland
- the_dr_slump / GTP_dr_slump
Not all of them have the exact same engine.
But I see your point. I guess they simply didn't want to have as example R32s being faster than the newer R33s or even R34s.
Generally, the newer the cars, the more hp they have. This rule has many exceptions though, but still applies in most cases.
- 129
- Canada
Hyundai Clix - 530+ hp, 900+ on N2O, runs the 1/4 in around 8.7 secs
Nissan 350Z '07 - 571 hp
Nissan Skyline RS Turbo - 483 hp
Nissan 350Z '07 - 571 hp
Nissan Skyline RS Turbo - 483 hp
Last edited:
- 1,942
- florida
- kttheman001
I'm going to bring this up again because it's extremely annoying me now. I have nothing against you, this is to everyone who does this, and you just so happened to do it in this post.
We do not know FOR SURE what "hp boost" nitrous (nos for those of you who call it by a brand name -.-) gives us. A 900 HP car COULD get a 900 hp boost from a 100% shot! Or MAYBE it's 100% of the stock hp, say 320... Or MAYBE they ARE fixed numbers, Such as a 100% shot is 300 hp, and a 50% shot is 150hp. BUT WE DONT KNOW!!!!!! So please to all of those who do it, and maybe aren't even members of GTP, STOP adding it to the original hp figure of the car.
- 129
- Canada
I understand what you mean, however if you put 100% injection on any car, then race a car with twice the hp of your car, they will be about the same (I've actually tested this multiple times). If it's how you say it is, then an 800 hp Evo (500 + 100% of 300) beat a 900+ hp Skyline, which has the same transmission setup, weighs the same, and has more power. If they did it in the way that 100% doubles your power, it would make sense since the cars with lower power have a higher injection than cars with higher power. (Ex. a 524 hp Evo 1 has a 100% injection, a 944 hp Supra has a 50% injection) if the hp boost is the injectionĂ—hp (ex. 524+100% of 524) then if you calculate the figures for all the cars, the shot only ranges from 100-600 thereabouts. This means its not completely unrealistic, and the higher shots are only for engines that can take it.
Last edited:
- 1,942
- florida
- kttheman001
Show me the proof. In this game if it's not shown then it's not true unless PD says it is. Seeing is believeing. Until we can get conformation that that theory is accurate it is JUST a theory. Not fact.
- 129
- Canada
- 2,340
- Wilbraham, MA
- C-losk
Hey has a valid point KT, I think it should be the hp + the 100% shot, I'm gonna do some math I'lll be back
- 1,942
- florida
- kttheman001
Is this hard evidence? No. There are still variables. Until there is actual proof, it can not be deemed true.
- 129
- Canada
Did you watch it? You can see the theoretically 900+ hp mr2 beating cars with much more power. Also, you can keep on disproving my calculations until PD puts in an actual measuring system, or tells us what the injection quantity means. I'm not being ignorant, im just trying to give you my idea on how the nitrous system works. If you think about it, it does make sense.
- 1,942
- florida
- kttheman001
The issue with an MR2 is it's so much lighter that even a 300 shot would allow it to keep up with those cars. Maybe a 400 but none the less. A friend and I have devised a way to test your theory. Let's see if this works.
2 honda fits. Automatic, stock trans, stock suspension.
1- all power upgrades, no weight reduction. No N2O.
2- all power upgrades, no weight, hp at 50% so 1/2 the power and a 100% shot which would double the HP, so they should run even.
100% shot- nos fit pulls by 5 cars.
70% shot- nos pulls by 2 cars and looses 1/4 in 4th gear, nos fit wins by 1 3/4 cars.
55% shot- nos pulls until 4th gear where all motor pulls back to win by a car.
Next test-
148 hp fit aka 1/2 my hp(not many parts, no weight, nos 100%)
My fit still the same as last test no nos.
100% shot- pulls 5 cars.
CONCLUSION- 100% shot is approx 250.
Last edited:
- 590
- AZ
- jspectoaster
Only problem with cutting engine output is that the torque curve is generally altered greatly, especially at 50%
