Well, I recently bought a Fit and my only major caveats about the car are the styling, which isn't very manly if you know what I mean... and the low end grunt of the engine, which is quite poor considering I live in a mountaineous area. Rear drums aren't a major turndown since I don't use the car in extreme situations.
I'm seriously considering either a Focus or a Forte ( Cerato ) as replacements for my car at the end of the year, but the plucky styling of the Rio captivated me. Although I doubt we'll ever get them around here, though.
I have pretty much the same feelings on my Fit. Most people find it ugly but honestly, I just chalk the shape as functional.
Low end is pretty sad but it's a 1.5L.
I even considered a Citroen C4, which costs roughly the same and packs the same equipment coupled to a much bigger engine and better looks. The abrupt reduction on the resale value pushed me to get the little Honda.
How on earth d'you get a C4 in New York?![]()
I'm in Brazil.I thought that at this point I was a well known member, turns out that I'm not.
Did you ever check this? That might explain it.
Those are discs. Problem?
Functional is the word to describe it, since it's easy to park even in the most cluttered and busy mall parking lot and not awfully ugly. Interior wise, well, it's the best in class around here : Sound insulation, ride quality and material feel are miles away of the local VW, Fiat and GM competitors.
of course not!
the opposite actually.
rear disc breaks on an entry level hatchback is unheard of in the u.s.!
so this is certainly welcomed!
(hopefully they don't change their minds before it is officially released)
-> I know the C-segment SkyActiv is kinda off-topic in this bunch, but its a note worthy model here. I wonder how will it compare to the other Eco-ized C-seg cars (Cruze Eco, Civic HF, etc.).
They are unheard of cause they aren't really needed. If you looked closely you would see it was the SX, which I think is the top of the line/sports model.
Might not make a difference but I would suspect it will be sold with drums out back.
The Cobalt looked a lot better than the Cavalier when it came out, too.Wasn't even aware it existed until just now researching for an article, but it certainly looks a hell of a lot better than the Aveo it's replacing.
The Cobalt looked a lot better than the Cavalier when it came out, too.
Best place for this I think and I've not seen another thread, but on the subject of cheap cars ruling... how good does the 2012 Chevy Sonic look?
![]()
![]()
Wasn't even aware it existed until just now researching for an article, but it certainly looks a hell of a lot better than the Aveo it's replacing. Looks like we'll be getting it still badged Aveo, and obviously it won't be as cheap over here, but it's a pretty good looking small car. Interior takes lots of cues from the Volt too, which is a good thing.
Hatch doesn't count as a door. It's a hatch. You don't climb through a door.
^ I know, but some people implies to 3 or 5 door on hatches & 2 door for coupes / 4 door sedan...
homeforsummer^ That. The motor industry consideres a hatch as a door, mainly to differentiate it from sedans, coupes etc.
The Veloster above is what I'd call a 5-door hatch. The "coupe" Veloster is a 3-door hatch.
^ The concept was a 3-dr hatch:The Veloster above is what I'd call a 5-door hatch. The "coupe" Veloster is a 3-door hatch.
The Vanishing Boy-> ...
^ The concept was a 3-dr hatch:
1 driver side + 1 passenger side + 1 hatch = 3 doors
-> While the production version is an odd 4-dr configuation:
1 driver side + 2 passenger side + 1 hatch = 4 doors
^ But Hyundai is mulling a 5-dr model in the near future...![]()
-> While the production version is an odd 4-dr configuation:
1 driver side + 2 passenger side + 1 hatch = 4 doors
I think calling the Mini Clubman a hatchback is stretching the definition a bit far...