Chysler Imperial: Chysler's attempt at a Bently

  • Thread starter Joey D
  • 62 comments
  • 2,021 views

Joey D

Premium
47,538
United States
Lakes of the North, MI
GTP_Joey
GTP Joey
Pictures and Information taken off of www.autoweek.com

The Chrysler Imperial concept.

At the opposite extreme lies the luxurious Imperial riding on a 123-inch wheelbase, a three-inch stretch over the 300C. To achieve the proper proportions for the concept, the overall length grows 17 inches to 214 inches, and the overall height is six inches taller than a 300C. The car rides on massive 22-inch turbine-finned wheels and tires, with passengers sitting nearly seven inches higher than in the 300C.

Envisioned as a “noble” yet attainable flagship positioned a cut above the 300C (“It’s a six-figure image but at a much lower price,” says Tremont), the concept designed in Chrysler’s Auburn Hills studio doesn’t mimic Imperials of the past, but it does draw on some of the styling cues from those older cars. It also carries expressive attributes from Chrysler’s long line of concept cars, from the 1953 d’Elegance to the Fire-power that premiered at last year’s Detroit show.

Blazin's notes: Basically what we have here is another car on the same platform as the Magnum, Charger, Challenger, 300C, and 300C Tourning. It will have the same batch of engines and look just as ugly as all the others. But the one thing Chysler do have going for them is that the Hemi is a good power plant, over marketed, but still a good engine never the less.

Photos:
bilde


bilde
 
the others werent ugly to me but this is stupid ugly. its a complete ripoff of the phantom. suicide doors n all
 
Is it just me, or does that car look a bit like it came from the 80s? Fugly nonetheless. Truly fugly.
 
Sweet I'm the minority. Finally a good car off of that idiotic 300C/Magnum/Charger/Challenger platform. This one looks better than all of those combined.

Having said that, it's a DC product and I'd never buy anything from that company that doesn't have an AMG or Brabus badge on it. 👎
 
I take it that's what the orignal car lookes like? Kinda like Chysler's verison of a Cadillac.
 
The original was a beautiful car, but I believe it had a push button transmission, with buttons mounted on the dash board..not known for their mechanical reliability.
 
That car looks like a 300C. It's a gluttonous fatty, just like imperial monarchs!

I think they're trying to squeeze as much out of the 300's design as they possibly can.
 
Id say it is a pretty nice car, classicly American in design... Obviously the car is aimed directly at the baby-boomers and the older folks, not the younger generation that would prefer a Bentley because of 50-cent's last video...

I'm game if Chrysler decides to build it. My grandfather had an Imperial for a short period of time (among his other Chryslers: 300D, Fury, Golden Comando, Desoto, etc...)

It would be interesting to see how the car compares to the upcomming Cadilac ULS super-sedan that is supposed to be comparible to the 7-series and S-class.
 
What a complete ripoff of the Rolls Phantom. I mean god damn, the c pillars are exact.
 
It looks better viewed form that angle:

dec28imp_3.jpg


Looks like a baby Phantom, with much better proportions to me, but they really messed up that front end...
 
High-Test
Lets see if I can photoshop it to look better...


Here we go!
ChryslerImperialCrown.jpg
:lol: I did that joke in the Challenger thread. I like the one TwinTurboJay posted better. What a boat 👍.

I don't mind this. Total complete utter total Phantom ripoff, but I like that too.
 
That thing is truly horribul in design, as all modern Chryslers are (exception being ME4-12, but thats a concept) so I guess it´ll fit in neatly in the modelrange!
Looks like the Phantom? Some, but not as sleek as the RR, although I don´t like the design on that either.
 
Interesting concept(not as in concept car), but I agree with you guys on this one. It's extremely ugly.
 
I don't really find it very ugly...just not particularly attractive. I mean, I'd take this over a Magnum or Charger.

The only thing I really dislike about this car is that it's still a 300...:rolleyes: They better start coming up with some new ideas...
 
Carl.
It looks better viewed form that angle:

dec28imp_3.jpg


Looks like a baby Phantom, with much better proportions to me, but they really messed up that front end...
looks better in that picture than the first one posted........but still an obvious rolls royce wannabe. I like the taillights. LEDs own.

I imagine it will sell alright with those who want the big shot image without the big shot price. or old people.
 
So whats wrong with Chrysler trying to build a Rolls Royce look-alike for $50K?
 
YSSMAN
So whats wrong with Chrysler trying to build a Rolls Royce look-alike for $50K?
To me, it looks like a cheap imitation of a respectable car. The design ruins everything.

If you want a Rolex but have only $300, would you buy a $300 Seiko or $300 imitation Rolex? That's just me me though. :)
 
Back