- 492
- Edinburgh
- crcn11
- crcn11
stuff written down
^I agree with pretty much everything you say.
stuff written down
Lets be real though. It's more then just for tire looks (after looking over the hybrid pic pages I'm shocked my RX-7 had smack talked about the wide stance, the wide over cambered cars there are a lil hard to kook at.....)
The real reason they are used is the lighter chassis weight, adjustable downforce (justify it with ballast and reduced downforce all you like, don't change it in my eyes) The performance benefits that come with a wider stance and a more rigid chassis. All of this distorts the character of the platform, removing the character of the Body (more like the skin) being used.
This is still a perceptual difference. The chassis "code" is exactly the same for all cars in the game. That's how vehicle systems for games is done.
Grip, rigidity, weight, weight distribution, wheelbase/track. The swap itself adds the ability for downforce but if you want to build a good 500-550 car, you'll want the downforce set to 0. Does it have extra grip? Yes, but only maybe 5% more based on what I've found so far, so you need to decide whether you want to decrease grip to increase HP or leave it and deal with the HP deficit.
Peugeot 908+Challenger
1115kg. No downforce. Stock motor. 550pp
So, my point is that ANY chassis swap is not legit in reality. If you swap a unit body chassis from one car to the next, you're changing the car. However, can I get a challenger to be 1115kg with 50/50 weight? I think so.
This is Eric Bana's Ford Falcon. It's all the things that are supposedly not "legit" when it comes to a race car chassis swaps in GT5.
Anyway, it's all opinion. I don't worry so much about the real world legitimacy of any swap. I just want it to look clean and work properly.
Are we off topic enough yet?
you people obviously fail to see what Legit and non-Legit swaps are. The Only guy here who seems to understand what I mean is FastASheck.
Actually, I'm pretty sure it's a matter of the only ones who seem to care about the arbitrary distinction are you and FastASheck.
Anyway, it seems that the RX-7 LM chassis is narrower than the RE Amiya one. Which isn't something I would have expected, honestly. It certainly doesn't look narrower in the original car; but it didn't have more downforce like I expected it to anyway (haven't driven the RX-7 LM in a long time, so forgot that stuff) so there wasn't any real benefit regardless. Also tried out the 2003 NSX JGTC in the F40 and it works real nice. Carries over the performance a lot better than the multipliered-down 787b engine I was trying, and it goes well with the interior gauges (F40s tach maxes at 10k, and the NSX engine maxes at 9800 with the racing exhaust).
Actually, I'm pretty sure it's a matter of the only ones who seem to care about the arbitrary distinction are you and FastAShecK
You say we are the only ones who care about an "arbitrary" distinction when IN FACT it is the furthest thing from an arbitrary distinction.
Probably because they want to know why you're making the distinction in the first place rather than any actual attachment to your reasoning. Seems kinda moot to me to fight over which form of hacking the game save produces more legitimate results than others.
Perhaps we can get back to which chassis and engine swaps produce cool results than the side discussion about which ones are more "legitimate"?
Then why don't you make a thread listing all of the chassis swaps that are legitimate and illegitimate for each car and let the people trying to discuss which ones they like do so in peace.
The point is "blah blah he called the 908 swapped Challenger legit and that offends me enough to bury the topic under 3 pages of arguing over it because I care about his word choice for some reason."I dont really think your getting the point.
So just deal with it I guess?
The point is "blah blah he called the 908 swapped Challenger legit and that offends me enough to bury the topic under 3 pages of arguing over it because I care about his word choice for some reason."
At which point, see sentence above.
Sure, if it doesn't bother you enough to get it fixed.Sad how thats the common response when people have a problem with a subject. So I guess If my car gets a giant dent in the fender, I should just deal with that too right?
Sure, if it doesn't bother you enough to get it fixed.
I get exactly what you're trying to say. I'm just at a complete loss for why I should care.
Just like some folks here into LMP take it a bit personal if the facts posted about LMP cars is molested and the use of LMP parts considered "arbitrary".....
I love LMP, I watch Lemans for the full 24 hours, but I'm not offended that someone would dare put a Peugeot chassis underneath a Challenger. It makes very little sense, but that's the achilles heel to all of it. People have freedom to do what they want with their own cars in their own game, so why try and limit that? Its part of the fun, knowing that I'm not limited by real life physics or possibilities, so I have fun with it, rather than hate on it because it can't happen in real life. Instead of looking at this like real life, I've taken a step back to just enjoy some of the crazy machines people have created.
People spend a lot of time on these frankenstein cars, tuning them to be their ideal version of said car. I don't touch Ferrari's in the game, I love Ferrari's just the way they are and they're perfect to me. But I don't get on people's cases when the put Engine tuning on it, or whatever, because they're enjoying the game in the same way I enjoy putting an R92CP chassis under my Aristo.
and the SRT8 chassis fits perfect under the superbird
Is there wheel clipping on that one?
I get exactly what you're trying to say. I'm just at a complete loss for why I should care how "legitimate" you find the chassis swaps I do in the game are; or why anyone should be bothered which slang words Hei used to describe his Challenger in the first place.