Scaff
Moderator
- 29,724
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
And you still have yet to explain to us your position on the subject despite being clearly asked three times by two members.That is just great for you that you have come to the conclusion rape is wrong and I'm sure you view other acts in such a way but that does nothing when discussing morality in a larger scale.
ScaffThe bible specifically details the conditions under which rape, capital punishment and slavery are all acceptable, do you hold with those moral views?
I find it rather odd that you are repeatedly asking the same questions of others (even after they have clearly answered), yet are ignoring questions that have been asked of you.
I wonder why that is?
Now please answer the question.
The fact is that we can't even discuss this equally with you, as you have refused to explain your moral position on this subject.One could have come to a logical conclusion by reasoning that rape would be pleasurable for himself and beneficiary to passing on his genetic line. What you are left with is a sad state where you can't say it is wrong only that you disagree.
As such the sad state is that we can only conclude that you believe rape is acceptable under certain conditions because an iron age book says so.
Apparently an iron age book.Who decides whats wrong? Only can say it is wrong from your perspective.
No its not, its a logical fallacy and a position you have assigned to someone else based on a twisted interpretation of a statement they made. You've been asked not to do this before, don't keep repeating this kind of behavior.A great example of your inability to live out your atheism.
What is rather un-surprising is that you have repeatedly done this (because people do actually answer the questions you have raised), yet you are doing pretty much all you can to avoid a straightforward question you have been asked.
What you will notice is the utter lack of surprise on behalf of most members here, as this is a pattern we have seen many times over.