Don't Consider the Element Until You've Seen the Scion xB...

  • Thread starter 1X83Z
  • 72 comments
  • 5,259 views
it doesn't look any different. It's a box on 4 wheels, except this one's all the same color, which is the big problem with the Element.

108hp? puh-lease... is it a mail truck, or a small car?
 
ahh i'd rather buy an Element and take it to a paint shop and have the grey plastic parts painted to the pody color. that way you get a better looking vehicle with better features and more power.
 
for some unknown reason i actually like the way the front and back end of the Element, that is if it came in one color though.
 
Originally posted by M5Power


PunkRock, do you like ANY non-preformance cars; non-Hondas?

Yes. anything not called a Corvette, or not sporting a Ferrari badge, is a car i like. Nothing with a 108hp engine, trying to claim itself as a sporty wagon is good, too.
 
Originally posted by PunkRock
Yes. anything not called a Corvette, or not sporting a Ferrari badge, is a car i like. Nothing with a 108hp engine, trying to claim itself as a sporty wagon is good, too.

I have to concur with this, at least partially. "Multi-purpose" or "cool -- but in a gay way" does in no way equate to "sporty". Colin Chapman must be reaching 9,000 rpm by now....
 
Still, my top pick is the Element as of now, but this coming weekend, I'll be at the LA Auto Show. Them I'll judge the Scion if its a worthy consideration than the Element.
 
Originally posted by neon_duke
w00t.
I must say that is the shortest post I have ever seen Neon do. . . :odd:

The Xb looks tight, I wouldn't mind it for entertainment purposes. . . : )
 
I don't see why so many men, who are in their thirties and above, are so critical when they talk about the Scion xB. My stepfather says it's a go-kart for black people (because he previewed a soundtrack to the Scion xB and it was mostly rap), my uncle says it's a rolling box with a weak engine, and the insults to them are pouring in but I say otherwise. I think that Toyota has taken a huge step when they created the Scion brand, and they are now coming out with a coupe called the tC, and believe me, the tC is awesome! But what I'm really trying to say is that the Scion isn't just a run-of-the-mill car brand, it's an automotive statement. It will make a huge impression when it reaches the east coast, and believe me, if I had $15,000, I'd get my hands on an xB ASAP!
 
The thing about the XB is that paper specifications can not sum up why the car is good. There are certain elements that make it quite attractive.

One example is the driver's seat. The seat itself, the position, the positions of the pedals and wheels, all are exceptional. The design of the instruments is another good point. They manage to be cool and small while still remaining easy to see for the driver. In fact, they are very similar to the gauges in GT3's external view.

Also, while it lacks power, the handling is quite good. The suspension is tuned quite well, and is stiff enough to satisfy those who like to hit the curves. Also keep in mind that it's quite light.

And, there's no denying that the car has a lot of style. You either like it or you hate it. To the average person, a Camry, a Malibu, an Accord, a Taurus, etc, all look the same. The XB is instantly recognizable to even the most car inept people.
 
Don't consider suicide until you've seen the Scion xB.

I don't know, Doug. The first thing I look for in a new car is a good driver's seat. Then I look at the rear window, then the wiper blades. The mufflwer tip is the final thing I look at before I decide if I am going to buy a car.

All this engine stuff is meaningless.
 
You guys may sneer, but in a city like LA, where it's quite common to spend an hour or more in traffic each way, every weekday, a good driver's seat can be very important. My old car had an absolutely horrible one. Every day, after coming home, my back hurt so bad I could hardly walk around, and my legs compounded the problem, due to bad pedal placement.

As for issues like Style, handling, and the like not being part of the decision-making process, that's where you're wrong. The car is not at all designed to appeal to the normal car buyer. It's designed to appeal to the normal car buyer's son or daughter, or to a buyer at the very yound end of the normal spectrum. To someone like that, style is a very important part of choosing a car. Someone who would buy an xB is someone who would refuse to even consider a Hyundai or a Kia, or even one of the more mundane cars from the major Japanese manufacturers.

Toyota's goal was to make an affordable car that was desireable. The average young person doesn't want a Corolla or a Civic, but they'll get one, because it's economically practical. But the same person may well actually want an xB in the same way that they might want a Lancer Evolution, an Impreza WRX STi, or a 350Z, the difference being that they can actually afford the xB. They've succeeded admirably in creating the car, and have done quite well bringing the car to the US under the Scion name.

So, if the car doesn't have the necessary attributes to attract buyers, why has Toyota had to increase production to overtime to keep up with the demand for the car?
 
Just to reassure the xB nay-sayers out there, some of the drawbacks to the xB are temporary. For example, the engine can be taken to a Scion dealership and be tuned up to provide more power. Also, about the space inside, if you have read Consumer Report's SUV issue, the Scion xB was commented as having "... the most interior space in a car in this price range..." and also said that "... the rear passengers are treated to limo-like roominess..." And if you think that this space isn't enough for your needs, think again. You can fold the rear seats flat to increase cargo volume.
 
I know because I was following the Scion community since the car's announcement. It was specifically stated that Toyota had to add a third shift to their factory to keep up with higher-than-expected demand from the US market.
 
Back