Joel
Premium
- 8,141
- Halifax, NS
- Noob616
Eh. I don't think verbally intervening when some guys are harassing women is the same sort of implied danger as an active armed robbery with a gun.Where's the huge difference? Both incidents involved extremely dangerous people. (Who, quite frankly, should always be dealt with by cops, because unfortunately, your average citizen generally doesn't come equipped with the skills or tools to defeat said people in a battle, and it'd be preferable if no civilians got themselves killed as martyrs.)
Still nobody has addressed that in 2009 a white guy in his 50's, a CFO of a large corporation (Dominik Brunner) was given the same award as the woman in "Case A" for intervening (and being killed) when some teenagers were picking on school kids. If I'm supposed to believe that Case A only got publicity and the award because she was a migrant woman, it's pretty suspect that a white male CFO in his 50's got the same award. If we're supposing there's a liberal "double standard", being Dominik Brunner would be pretty much the worst combination of demographics there is, yet he received the same Order of Merit.Ah, but they do.
And this is what is called benevolent sexism/racism. "Look, she's a woman/migrant, but she can act as heroically as any German man!". The implication is that A did something extraordinary that goes against her nature, while B just did his duty.