- 40,891
From what I've read, it seems that the government is trying to establish a precedent that states that E-mail is inherently non-private, due to the fact that to sign up for an e-mail service you have to agree to a terms of service that states that the ISP can look through your e-mail:
This part is especially scary:
Linky.
So am I reading into this wrong, or is this as ridiculous as it sounds?
This means that you are sharing your privacy with a large company, and thus waiving your privacy rights, which would allow the government to walk into the ISP building, grab your documents and walk out all without a warrant.The GovernmentBecause a customer acknowledges that Yahoo! has unlimited access to her e-mail, and because she consents to Yahoo! disclosing her e-mail in response to legal process, compelled disclosure of e-mail from a Yahoo! account does not violate the Fourth Amendment.
This part is especially scary:
So, when I cancel my subscription to, say, USA Datanet, I forfeit all of the private conversations that I held over E-mail while using the service to the government automatically?But then the government goes on: they note "some e-mail accounts are abandoned, as when an account holder stops paying for the service and the account is cancelled." There "can be no reasonable expectation of privacy in such accounts."
Linky.
So am I reading into this wrong, or is this as ridiculous as it sounds?