I apoop of this post.Sorry. I couldn't bear the thought that that post might not get poopied.
I mean, he's REALLY not helping his case saying that Doge isn't a pump and dump if he goes ahead and does this. Ignoring the fact that crypto could be a scam, to dance around violating SEC laws repeatedly is akin to walking into a live munitions field. Eventually it will blow up.I really don't mind him pumping Doge. I still have 10k of them floating around, those are now worth 920 Euro. Last time he went bananas with his Doge loving I bought the 62 Impala.
And all that for 10 euros of investment.
We need a polished poopie emoji.
They had just announced their Twitter alternativeI've never heard of them, but checking out their site, it looks to just be a site aimed at independent writers/podcasters create content through paid subscriptions.
I guess I'm just completely lost, but where is Twitter seeing the threat with them?
It's not so much that as it is the hypocrisy of claiming that you're going to be an open platform and represent free speech etc. and then doing the opposite.Well, it's his company, so he can do whatever he wants, but...
"Tishter"Next take the t down and put up an s and h.
"Tishter"
I think Alec Baldwin has the copyright on that.Next take the t down and put up an s and h.
What's the problem with Chris Pratt? Is it his rendition of Mario's voice which most people who've watched it, seem completely ok with. Or...is this another right-wing persecution fetish at hand where they believe Pratt isn't liked by liberal Hollywood because he's such a good, proud Christian man they believe the left has tried to "cancel"?Because critics have a problem with Chris Pratt
Plus hasn’t the Terminal List had good reviews while Pratt was at the helm?He's right, but the tweet he's quoting looks to be picking at what could be an underlying, irrelevant issue.
What's the problem with Chris Pratt? Is it his rendition of Mario's voice which most people who've watched it, seem completely ok with. Or...is this another right-wing persecution fetish at hand where they believe Pratt isn't liked by liberal Hollywood because he's such a good, proud Christian man they believe the left has tried to "cancel"?
Going by the comments, I'm confident I'm on the mark. Someone pointed out how well Guardians did with Pratt as the lead role, to which BoredElon tried to counter with Dominion & The Tomorrow War. I'm a gigantic Jurassic Park fan, and sorry, Dominion did kind of stink (& that's me not trying to cry saying that). Fallen Kingdom being mid-way (47%) & World (71%) immediately counter his point. Tomorrow War sucked major ass with big plot holes.
Critics don't have a problem with Pratt. They appeared to have reviewed this film from their perspective rather then perspective I've seen others approach, that this is a kid's movie, first and foremost so it's probably not going to be as in-depth & laid out to adults because it's made to make kids happy and sell Nintendo's brand. Overall, I have still seen it concluded as good movie that does what it was set out to do.
Supposedly people have a problem with Chris Pratt because they said he belonged to the Hillsong Church, even though he's come out and said he'd never gone there. I don't know the full scope of the "controversy" but based on some things I've seen floating around social media, it has to do with the church's anti-LGBT stance or something.What's the problem with Chris Pratt?
I don't like Chris Pratt because he was a) crap and b) literally just him in the first three things I saw/heard with him in, and I've neither seen nor heard anything with him in since that this didn't also apply to. I think Guardians of the Galaxy 1 was the third thing (might have been the second, and I watched a couple of episodes of the sitcom he's in afterwards), so I was on the "Can Chris Pratt be over now?" train early.What's the problem with Chris Pratt?