According to one man speaking on Norwegian TV.According to Norwegian TV
The Spain parliament vote was planned, the answer to the vote to come is the declaration of independence.Spain have responded by saying they're imposing direct rule on Catalonia. Sounds like they did that a few hours too late.
Why i'm not surprised to learn that prime minister Dimitri Medvedev is supporting Catalunya independence by having engaged bilateral relations this week?
Russia doesn't like state fragmentation unless it happens in the western Europe.
I know the propaganda in some countries will be looking for Moscow's hand in this anyway, like Kremlin has nothing to do but to flame separatism in a country so far away, without any having interests in the region.
So Spain has announced a date for regional elections in Catalonia - the only trouble is, pro-independence Catalans will (in all likelihood) not take part - not least because they will not wish to convey the idea that Spain still have any authority in the region. Thus, the new regional government will be mostly pro-Spanish/anti-independence people. So, the Catalans hold votes where anti-independence supporters refuse to take part, and the Spanish hold votes where pro-independence supporters refuse to take part - with each of them getting the 'democratic' result they want.
Or the Catalans could just keep voting for pro-independence governments. I'm guessing Spain will keep getting rid of them until they vote for the government that Spain wants, but that just makes a mockery of their "democracy".
And the fact that the head of government has "fled" to Belgium and has hired the ETA lawyer there does him absolutely no favours, even within his own political people.
So if no accident, what accounts for the radiation? Perhaps Russia has gone to war with aliens in the heart of the Urals?Russian state denies that there has been a nuclear accident at any of its plants after concerns over the discovery of a concentrated amount of ruthenium-106 in France. BBC.
So if no accident, what accounts for the radiation? Perhaps Russia has gone to war with aliens in the heart of the Urals?
It’s all Russia again. Because it's RUthenium.Russian state denies that there has been a nuclear accident at any of its plants after concerns over the discovery of a concentrated amount of ruthenium-106 in France. BBC.
Assessment of current situation The IAEA collaborated with Member States and relevant international organizations in collecting, analysing and sharing data with emergency contact points via USIE. This facilitated the exchange of information and contributed to national assessments. The reported measurements of Ru-106 in air are in the range of 10s of µBq/m3 to 10s of mBq/m3 . The radiological significance of such concentrations of Ru-106 in the air is very low. The IAEA considers that levels reported to the IAEA pose no risk to human health. On the basis of all data reported up to now, the IAEA has observed some tendency towards decreasing air concentrations of Ru-106. Ru-106 is a common fission product and would not be expected to be routinely monitored in atmosphere. The absence of any other fission products in the air samples implies that the Ru- 106 is not being released from a nuclear power plant. Ru-106 is used in the treatment of ocular cancer. Due to the level of their activities7 , the brachytherapy sources used in these types of cancer treatment are unlikely to cause, if aerosolized and dispersed, the wide-spread reported air concentrations. Some references state that Ru-106 could be used as a source for radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG), however such usage is not common due to its short half-life. Based on the monitoring data and the information provided by the Member States to the IAEA, no specific event or location for the dispersal of Ru-106 into the atmosphere have been determined. It is currently not possible for the IAEA to make conclusions towards identifying a location of the release without factual reporting from a State of the origin of the release.
£5 on Bristol!
Since when do you need proofs for blaming Russia for anything?The EU has joined the UK in blaming Russia for the attack on the spy.
While this seems the right thing to do as it has all the hallmarks of a Russian hit, our Prime Minister was asked if he had seen any proof delivered that showed it was the Russians.
No, but that isn't necessary because the Brits see Russian involvement as 'highly likely'.
WHAT THE **** KIND OF REASONING IS THAT???
Since when do you need proofs for blaming Russia for anything?
It became a tradition already. "We have the evidence but we won't show it to anyone".To be fair, it is not exactly customary to hand the evidence in an attempted murder case to the prime suspect(s).
However, I do agree more generally with the idea that the accused should at least be aware of what the evidence against them is, but given the highly unusual nature of the attack (the first use of chemical weapons in the UK since WW2), intelligence/diplomatic sensitivity (the victim was a former UK-Russian spy) and the broader issue of Russian behaviour towards the UK, Europe and Nato in recent years, it is understandable why the UK government are playing their cards close to their chest.
Meanwhile, there's a scary thing going on in France:
http://www.euronews.com/2018/03/23/man-holds-hostages-in-supermarket-in-southwest-france-reports
Hostages taken by a gunman, at least two killed.
ad anyone seen any proofs on public? No.
This is probably my biggest fear: terrorist activity in a small town of 5000 people. I used to fancy myself neatly out of that kind of harm's way in my current location "far away from civilization", but not anymore I guess.Meanwhile, there's a scary thing going on in France:
http://www.euronews.com/2018/03/23/man-holds-hostages-in-supermarket-in-southwest-france-reports
Hostages taken by a gunman, at least two killed.