How am I supposed to know? Did I program GT3?whereismkhow?
Nice edit! But you have a hybrid on a memory card that's attached to your PS2, yes?whereismkno i did that without hybriding
Ahem!whereismkokay here is what happend my dad's file has zero hybrids and he won that glitched EVO in a race (i think it is EVO VIII)
daanBut you have a hybrid on a memory card that's attached to your PS2, yes?
whereismkwell how do you exploit that bug tell me each step on how to do that
whereismki didn't mean master compared to you guys you guys have hybrids he doesn't
whereismkhe uses REAL cars and breaks the track records at a bunch of places
whereismki probably can't retreve the replays from GT3 since now he plays GT4
whereismki dont really know i hardly watch him, i cant display every freiken record in the book that would take hours (and patience which i have none of)
whereismkhe has used slower cars and still never loses
whereismkno i mean he can use very slow cars at other races and win all the time but he used an F1 for the 24 hour race (he didn't want to waste his 4.5 examillion bank account)
amp88/me thinks Famine is a little bit annoyed at Roo and I showing him up in the 2006 German GP thread and he's taking that out on someone.
FamineWhat a shock that is.
Look - if you never lose, you aren't driving competitive cars. You're driving over-qualified cars. It's nothing to be proud of.
Anyway - one "lap record" he's broken please. Just one.
whereismkno i did that without hybriding
FamineIt's easy to say that you're good, but hard to back it up. It's just as easy to say that you're the best - or "he is the absolute master" - but very hard to back it up.
The GT Community is built on racing in Gran Turismo - even though that may form only a very small part of it, it's what the foundation is. When someone new comes in and makes all kind of claims about their ability, it's generally considered that they should put up or shut up - prove their ability or stop making claims about it.
If whereismk's dad IS "the absolute master" then we have a new driver for the Weekly Race Series to pit our talents against. But for every hundred people we have claiming to be the best, we have 1 who is in the top 25 but doesn't shout about it from the rooftops.
As you found out yesterday, it's easy to talk and a lot less easy to do. You said that you were 2 seconds faster than Flinx and put it all down to your smoothness - when it actually turned out that you were 8 seconds slower and had misread the time. Easy enough mistake to make, no problem.
The claim that he "breaks the track records at a bunch of places" would be easy to back up in the first instance - just by telling us one track record he's broken. Since we know whereismk has a MaxDrive, providing us with a replay would be no problem at all either. So we have a potential new driver with claimed fast times AND the ability to back them up by the most widely used and best-accepted method - how often does that happen?