Over the next couple of weeks, I'm going to attempt all of the FGT races in a stock 787B, bought new and without an oil change. I'm going to try to do them all without cheating, which, with NTSC's longer pit window, will be a tall order at a couple of tracks (Tokyo, Motegi Super Speedway, and possibly some others). I plan to use R2 tires and full downforce with no driving aids, and I'll try to leave the setup at default, but I might need to adapt it in order to win the toughest races. I know about the setup for Super Speedway 150 Miles, but because it was designed for wallriding and with different downforce, does anyone have any advice on what I should do to the setup for that track?
Edit: I decided to start with the first race, Tokyo, and I won more comfortably than I expected.
Edit 2: Never mind about the question on the setup for Super Speedway, because I completed it, too, and also much more comfortably than I expected.
1. Tokyo Route 246
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 17 (although 16 would have been better), full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:22'17.488
Margin of victory: Approximately 49 seconds
Fastest lap: 1'18.508
Pit window: 12 laps
AI pit window: 11-12 laps
Perplexingly, not to mention disturbingly, the fastest cars also pitted the least often. Every AI car had at least two stints of twelve laps, but all except the blue and white car also had at least one stint of eleven laps, which automatically put them way behind it; I lapped three cars right at the end of the race when they made their final stop. I wasn't happy with the frequency with which I made wall contact (or, for that matter, the consistency in my lap times), but it's certainly clear that I've improved since my first success at getting 200 points in this race, because back then, I won by a smaller margin despite using the car in a higher-horsepower configuration and wallriding the long 180-degree turn. Car-less's report on the FGT series makes clear how much harder this race is in NTSC: because PAL AI cars pit every nine laps, and therefore twice more than the best NTSC cars, his 1:24'xx total time gave him a margin of victory of 40 seconds. Evidently, then, a winning time in this race is a minute and a half faster in NTSC than in PAL.
2. Twin Ring Motegi Super Speedway
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 16 (although 17 would have been better), 63/74 downforce, R3 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:02'26.123
Margin of victory: Approximately 1.5 laps
Fastest lap: 26.898 (draft-assisted; 26.920 without)
Pit window: 12-13 laps
AI pit window: 13 laps (with one stint of 12 from one car)
In this race, I decided that I was never going to win by trying to outlast the AI on pit stops, so I switched to R3 tires and reduced the rear downforce until I was offered 200 points. At first, you can barely maintain the pace of the FGTs, so you stay a constant two or so seconds ahead of the pack, but once the fuel load lightens, you can pull away. With low fuel and warm tires, you can easily take the big corner full throttle at around 214 mph, although regardless of the condition of your tires, you have to watch out for the small corner, because the car is very eager to snap sideways when braking and turning on the banking at such high speed. Turning in slightly and then braking in a fairly straight line is the reliable way to get through the turn, but it's often actually faster to let the car snap sideways; it slows you down faster, and the car almost always pulls out of the slide on its own. Of course it isn't realistic, but it works. I made only five wall contacts and one AI contact, so it was a pretty clean race. Also, as an aside, this race works quite a bit like a Nascar race on a large superspeedway for the AI cars in that making a small mistake or pitting at a different time from everyone else will cause you to lose the draft and fall permanently behind.
3. New York
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 15, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:39'39.388
Margin of victory: Approximately 1.8 laps
Fastest lap: 1'18.183
Pit window: 15 laps
AI pit window: 11-12 laps
This race was pretty straightforward. I could have won by two laps, but it's impossible to pass without contact here unless the AI makes a mistake or is on cold tires. I was stuck behind the second place car for thirteen laps waiting in vain for an opportunity to get past before it finally hit the wall exiting the final corner, allowing me to draft past on the straight and have enough room to stay out of range of a bump from behind in the next turn. It ended up being a pretty clean race, with about ten wall contacts, but as a result of the meandering AI, about ten AI contacts, too.
4. High-Speed Ring
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 16 (although 17 would have been better), full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: No
Total time: 1:12'48.419
Margin of victory: 4 laps (technically, 3 laps and 1.5 minutes; the car that stayed out for an extra lap had just crossed the line in the pits when I finished the race, although the third-place car, four laps down and not far behind me, would have finished well ahead of it)
Fastest lap: 53.670 (with draft; 53.905 without)
Pit window: 15-16 laps
AI pit window: 12 laps (with one stint of 13 from one car)
As anyone would have predicted, this was very simple. The tires were more durable than I had expected, and I was able to keep the race pretty clean (no AI contact, five wall contacts) as well as consistent. The Mazda is really more at home on slower tracks, though; even though the first corner is easy to take flat-out (which is very fortunate, because finding the turn-in point is pure guesswork), the car just understeers most of the time. By the way, at this track, if you're ever torn between two pit strategies, take the one with fewer stops, because a pit here takes a frightening 40 seconds.
5. Grand Valley Speedway
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 15, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:39'03.806
Margin of victory: Approximately 1.9 laps
Fastest lap: 1'30.983
Pit window: 10-11 laps (9 laps would have been easier, but not necessarily faster; although the tires weren't in great condition on lap 10, and were fried by the end of lap 11, calculating the time lost seemed to indicate that it was worth saving the pit stop)
AI pit window: 8 laps
This one wasn't very difficult, either. I came to enjoy driving this car here, even though the track is very punishing; you can get into a pretty good rhythm, and it's fairly rewarding to feed in the throttle slowly in second-gear corners while hugging the curb, because it makes you feel kind of like you're driving in a real simulation game.
I made quite a few small mistakes that saw me bounce off of walls, so it wasn't overly clean, but I didn't have to deal with the AI much, which was fortunate because the only reliable passing point here is on the front straight.
6. Circuit de la Sarthe I
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 17, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:16'21.235
Margin of victory: Approximately 1'45
Fastest lap: 3'13.482
Pit window: 6 laps
AI pit window: 4 laps
Knowing already that this would be an easy win, I tried to drive realistic lines, meaning that I attempted not to hop over or onto tall curbs or stray into runoff areas or grass. I did pretty well, but I put a couple of wheels in sand and grass a couple of times each, and on lap 22, I lost what I had thought would be a WRS-clean race (no wall or AI contact, and no more than two tires in grass or beyond rumble strips into runoff) when I ran wide of the curb in Maison Blanche for a fraction of a second.
Driving in this way, the AI cars were about equal in pace, but they pitted twice more than I did, and lost some time starting halfway through their fourth lap after a pit. A better strategy would have been to lower the downforce slightly (it isn't always beneficial at La Sarthe, anyway) in order to get 200 points with R3/R2 tires, since the rear tires were wearing much faster than the fronts, and hadn't actually worn out fully by lap 6 but weren't going to make it to lap 8.
7. Cote d'Azur
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 9, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:47'06.270
Margin of victory: Approximately 2.95 laps
Fastest lap: 1'18.737
Pit window: 11 laps
AI pit window: 9 laps
The AI and the FGTs don't mesh well with this course, so they're slow and pit a lot. With the short gearing, the 787B is pretty susceptible to wheelspin, but it is reasonably fun to drive at this track, and the race doesn't drag on quite as much as you might think. R3/R2 tires with lowered downforce might work a little better than my setup, which I used for the sake of consistency, but you'll win the race regardless. I made light AI contact only a couple of times and brushed walls about once every four laps, so it was a reasonably clean race. Fortunately, unlike in real life, you can pass here, along the back straight, extremely reliably, so frustration over AI is minimized. By the way, one of the AI cars acted strangely for about three laps after I brushed it; it took corners fairly normally, but braked and feathered the throttle intermittently on straights. I'll see if I can record it.
8. Seoul Central
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 15, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:28'55.405
Margin of victory: Approximately 3.5 laps (I forgot to look at where the second place car was on the track at the end of the race)
Fastest lap: 45.379 (with draft; 45.673 without)
Pit window: 28-29 laps (I was surprised that I could go this far)
AI pit window: 19-20 laps
As expected, this was very straightforward. It wasn't as horrible as I expected despite the length, and I was fairly consistent and made only four AI contacts (all with the stupid orange car
) and five wall contacts (three of which came in the chicane as a result of lost downforce behind an AI car). Passing isn't the easiest here, but it isn't bad compared to some other tracks in the series.
9. Infineon Raceway - Sports Car Course
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 10, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:37'55.770
Margin of victory: Approximately 2.6 laps (but it should have been more than 3)
Fastest lap: 1'13.608
Pit window: 12-13 laps
AI pit window: 10 laps
I can't figure out why others have had moderate difficulty with this race; the AI doesn't seem particularly good here, and LMP cars fit it pretty well. Unfortunately, my driving was embarrassingly sloppy. I was talking with my dad while driving for a while, and I missed my pit stop at lap 52, forcing me to reverse from the entrance to turn 11 in order to reach pit road. I also spun three times, which I almost never do, as a result of careless driving allowing a rear wheel to stray into the grass, and I had several other off-course moments.
10. Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 11, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:43'02.283
Margin of victory: Approximately 6.95 laps (but should have been well over 7)
Fastest lap: 1'09.509
Pit window: 14 laps
AI pit window: 11 laps (some may have pitted in occasional 10- or 12-lap stints, but it's impossible to keep track because the spins constantly shuffle the running order)
Everyone knows that the AI cars here are programmed with a line that turns in too early at the T3 mark, which takes them straight into the sand when they correct to the right. Interestingly, this problem must be even worse in NTSC than in PAL, because the combination of total time and margin of victory as compared to, say, Car-less', indicates that the AI cars finish much faster there. Unfortunately, sloppy driving bit me again, as I spun carelessly a few times and ran off course far more often than that. It certainly doesn't help that Laguna Seca is even more unforgiving than Infineon. The 787B is pretty good to drive here, but passing has to wait until the front straight unless a car spins in front of you at T3. By now, though, it's actually starting to feel noticeably sluggish, as it has 10 fewer horsepower than it does when new.
11. Twin Ring Motegi - Road Course
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 12, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:40'14.919
Margin of victory: Approximately 1.7 laps
Fastest lap: 1'30.188
Pit window: 10-11 laps
AI pit window: 9 laps
The Mazda does well at this course, so like Infineon, it wasn't a hard win despite some people complaining of some difficulty. Not only is the car down on power now (792 HP versus 803), but in this race, the chassis had also started to get "weavy." It was manageable, but it made driving less enjoyable. I wasn't quite as sloppy as in the last couple of races, but I still wasn't very happy with the number of off-course excursions. Passing can only be done on the long back straight, because this course is all about braking, and that's a strength of FGTs even under AI control.
12. Nurburgring Nordschleife
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 17, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:24'39.727
Margin of victory: 1 lap (having made pit stops as I came towards the line on the final lap, it was only barely a lap)
Fastest lap: 5'29.458 (but dirty; I have no idea what my fastest clean lap was)
Pit window: 3 laps (the tires were quite orange by the end, but they held up just fine under the weight of the downforce as long as they weren't provoked, e.g. by going over the jumps at Pflanzgarten)
AI pit window: 2 laps
The 787B is blindingly fast here, as evidenced by the total time, but with the very stiff stock settings and a chassis that seemed a little wobbly even after a refresh, I had close to twenty off-track moments, more than one per lap. My fastest lap is nowhere near what I could have done, but I just fell apart on all of my flying laps (of which I had only five because of my pit schedule). The same thing happened with an AI car here as at Cote d'Azur, with the car braking and coasting on straights, except that it lasted for four laps this time, which is quite a while on this track. Interestingly, this was the reason why my fastest lap was dirty - it was so far behind that it was exiting the pits as I began one of my flying laps, and I was so worried that it might be beside me as I tried to exit the corner that I didn't notice that I had gotten on the throttle too early and was heading for the guardrail.
13. El Capitan
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 15, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: Yes
Total time: 1:31'05.895
Margin of victory: Approximately 2.7 laps
Fastest lap: 1'20.571
Pit window: 9 laps
AI pit window: 8 laps
I like El Capitan, but it's just terrible to drive in LMP-type cars. The race was a pain, and it was made worse by the standing start, which, because of my lack of TCS, put me in fourth. Normally, that would be okay, but there simply are no passing points when the AI cars have warm tires and don't make mistakes. I was again pretty sloppy, and there wasn't really a perfect pit strategy; the tires weren't really worn out after nine laps, but they would have been toast after eleven, so I just chose the easy way out.
14. Fuji Speedway 2005
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 17, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: No (at Fuji, there's always an enormous and unavoidable logjam in the first corner, and you can't escape contact except by being in the back)
Total time: 1:36'19.059
Margin of victory: Approximately 2.1 laps
Fastest lap: 1'22.324
Pit window: 11 laps (13-14 might have been better, because the tires were barely tinged orange as it was, but I think they would have been in bad shape by 14 laps)
AI pit window: 9-10 laps (it seemed like some were pitting after eleven, but that doesn't make sense, so I probably just lost track)
I like this track a lot, which apparently puts me in a distinct minority, and I like driving the 787B here. I bought a new one for these last two races because the last one seemed worn out beyond repair, so my margin of victory is presumably larger than it would have been otherwise. However, I was weirdly inconsistent and rather sloppy, going off-track a little more than once every four laps. Passing is pretty easy, too. For some reason, despite my inconsistency, this track seems to get more addictive as you get into a rhythm, which probably has to do with the constant thought that "I can take this corner better next time."
15. Suzuka Circuit
Setup: Stock settings, autoset 14, full downforce, R2 tires, no driving aids
Qualifying: No (there's a logjam here, too)
Total time: 1:30'49.097
Margin of victory: Approximately 1'36 (but should have been one lap)
Fastest lap: 1'38.751
Pit window: 9 laps
AI pit window: 8 laps
This definitely wasn't the easiest race; the FGTs are well suited to this type of track, and it's hard to stay out of their way in places. You have to pass intelligently: it's easy to get by in several areas, but if you don't plan, you will probably get punted in the next corner. For example, when you pass along the curved back "straight" before Spoon, the AI cars knock you off the track in 130R, quite some distance away. They can be passed easily and securely only on their first, seventh, and eighth laps after pitting. I drove a pretty clean race, with only a couple bumps from behind and around eight offs, although I again lacked consistency.