- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
Ah, I come from a rallying family. Fog is to be revelled in.
Might as well reference the 2013 British Grand Prix.
I actually like it lolCitroën BX4TC Evolution
To say that this car was half-arsed is an understatement. It was quarter-arsed at best. Not only was it an ungodly eyesore, it was overweight, entirely too wide, underpowered, had the turning circle of an oil tanker and as a result, it was miserably slow. It was rushed through homologation with the bare minimum of forethought and was an embarrassment for all involved. It was a car that rallying never wanted, never needed, and was glad to see the back of.
Thexton Motor Racing
After selling his fruit juice company to Coca-Cola, New Zealander businessman and amateur rally driver David Thexton decided to make the jump to circuit racing. Rather than starting out at club level, he decided to buy the entire Paragon Motorsport V8 Supercars team and enter the full 2003 V8 Supercars season. Thexton finished 33rd in the season, only ahead of some part time drivers and enduro ring-ins, having DNQ'd for 10 of the 17 races he entered with a best result of 16th at the Bathurst 1000. At the Oran Park round, Thexton withdrew his entry from the meeting having been involved in an incident with David Besnard in practice that saw him being labelled a 'safety hazard' by other competitors.
A brand new BA Falcon could not change Thexton's fortunes for the 2004 season, failing to qualify in all of the three races he entered. Following this, the team's licence was transferred to WPS Racing and Thexton stepped back to Porsche Carrera Cup Australia for the remainder of the season with little success.
What was worst, was that Pescarolo Team decided to use the chassis for their Pescarolo 03 which failed just as bad.
Technical issues are nothing new at Le Mans. The Car was considerably faster than Audi, but it's Le Mans 24h you know.Peugeot 908 Le Mans 2010 disaster
While I'm probably very indifferent in this, but I think the 2014 Bathurst 1000 was a huge failure. Or as I like to call it, 2014 12 Hours of Sebring; Australia Addition.
Though unlike what happened at Sebring, it wasn't really the V8s fault but rather the terrible work of resurfacing the track. Turn 2 pretty much turned into a death trap which caused so much Safety Car cautions you can make a drinking game out of it. I cannot consider Chaz Mostert a deserving winner of this race since so many potential and more deserving winners got screwed over due to an overuse of Safety Car cautions and the death trap that was the tracks resurface.
Jamie Whincup deserved to lose after what he did in the final laps, and I actually reckon the 2013 Bathurst 1000 was one of the greatest Bathurst races and that had a Ford beating Whincup.Most of the accidents in turn 2, started in the braking zone for turn 2, not one crash in turn 2 was caused by the pot hole, and only the potential winners claimed at turn 2 was the Tander/ Luff HRT entry and the Lowndes T8 entry, and I to this day still believe that the only reason car #2 was pulled by the team was because they believed the could get the #22 entry into the top 10 shootout,
You need to remember that the #55 Reynolds/ Canto entry crashed at the grate, and Paul Morris buried the #6 car in to the fence at turn #2, and that car also started from the very back of the grid and was also a lap down at one point,
During the race, the #97 and #55 entries went out with mechanical failure, #22 went into the fence at Reid park, #33 went into the wall at the cutting, and the #1 car was having drive shaft issues prior to the red flag, which had them replaced during the red flag,
So I'm guessing your saying that because the Whincup car didn't win you claim the race was a disaster?
so many potential winners got screwed over in the end
True, though normally, the screw overs are because of a mistake in the car or the driver, here some got screwed over because the track resurface was so terrible which caused a lot of safety car cautions, way more than a usual Bathurst 1000. Lets not forget how bad some of the cars got during Practic and Qualifying because of the resurfacing.That is the lottery of endurance racing
Most of the accidents in turn 2, started in the braking zone for turn 2, not one crash in turn 2 was caused by the pot hole, and only the potential winners claimed at turn 2 was the Tander/ Luff HRT entry and the Lowndes T8 entry, and I to this day still believe that the only reason car #2 was pulled by the team was because they believed the could get the #22 entry into the top 10 shootout,
You need to remember that the #55 Reynolds/ Canto entry crashed at the grate, and Paul Morris buried the #6 car in to the fence at turn #2, and that car also started from the very back of the grid and was also a lap down at one point,
During the race, the #97 and #55 entries went out with mechanical failure, #22 went into the fence at Reid park, #33 went into the wall at the cutting, and the #1 car was having drive shaft issues prior to the red flag, which had them replaced during the red flag,
So I'm guessing your saying that because the Whincup car didn't win you claim the race was a disaster?
John Cleland"The guy who designed that corner should be taken into a dark room and be beaten to within an inch of his life!"
The redesigned first corner at Oschersleben (?)
The video actually cuts off the last part of the commentary:
The failure here are the drivers. There are lots of other series driving there and even the 14-16 year olds in Formula 4 (about 30 cars in every race) managed to do that better
Technical issues are nothing new at Le Mans. The Car was considerably faster than Audi, but it's Le Mans 24h you know.
I won't call it a disaster.
A bit of a mystery yes, but I don't think it takes a genius to realize 3 or 4 wide into there was never going to work. Hardly the corner's fault.Even though they are open wheeled, an F4 car is much narrower than a WT car. If I remember, that WTCC race was one of the very first after the corner was reprofiled. Now, yes, it might be known how to negotiate that corner from a standing start but the first few races would have been a mystery.
Skoda Fabia WRC
View attachment 497129
For Skoda Motorsport the early half of the 2003 World Rally Championship season, had been the best one yet. Both cars had had almost consistent point finishes. The introduction of the Fabia WRC in the middle of the season stopped this, as the car was both riddled with different mechanical issues and quite frankly lacked any real speed, so Skoda then decided that taking the 2004 season as a development season was needed, and only entered few rallies, with varying level of low success, with an odd points finish. The 2005 season, which was the first full season for the car that, the team ran Armin Schwartz in all events but Swedish Rally, the other two cars were driven by a list of drivers long enough to form their own World Championship. Skoda then ended the already rather embarrassing WRC programme to a last place of the Manufacturers Championship, with only a fraction of the points the second to last Mitsubishi had gathered.
It's pretty obvious that the reason why it was a failure is how the team was managed. But aside from occasional promising speed and having a great livery, the car hasn't really achieved anything.Er not really it was a good and fast car just look what McRae did with it.
Juan Montoya dominates the 2009 Brickyard 400 before speeding in the pits on the last pitstop which cost him the Race. He went into full meltdown mode and swore on his children and wife that he was not speeding. Montoya should have won 3 or 4 oval races despite having a good car for only 2 years in his NASCAR career but incidents like this would always bite him.