Re: Bottas jump start. Unless they flat out disqualify him, any penalty will keep him on the podium because he's more than 30 seconds ahead of Stroll.
Sky analysis showed he was within the .2 second allowance provided and then he slowed again anyways. He was probably still within his area when the actual lights went out. Probably safe there. Usually I think we've seen the penalties handed out during the race, if one was given.
Regarding the lapping Mercedes. It's happened before with dominant teams. Vettel did it in his days. It's not exclusive to Mercedes. Do people want BOP?
I know it's not new, but it's been more prevalent now than ever, right? I've only been following for the last decade and I know you have a plethora of knowledge to call upon so I'd be happy to know I'm wrong
It’s the end result of the teams gaining enough political power in the sport to essentially dictate the terms of engagement to the FIA. The teams essentially write the regulations, and the FIA ‘officiates’ them. It’s telling that the absolute first thing FOCA (what would become FOM) did was ban privateer teams, essentially ensuring nobody could follow in the footsteps of the likes of Brabham and Lotus and McLaren, and setting the stage for the requirement of being a works team or having works support to have any hope of being competitive. Then came regulations to restrict engine designs and aero advancement and the like that on the surface sound like good ideas, but in actuality turn F1 from being “hey, if we shape the floorboard this completely new way, we can pick up 2 seconds a lap” to “if we spend £10 million on this winglet, we can find 0.2 seconds a lap”. V10 era was the worst for this, and the current V6T-H is quickly displacing it. Until the likes of Mercedes and Renault jump ship, it’s always going to be more of the same: multi-year domination by the works team.I know it's not new, but it's been more prevalent now than ever, right? I've only been following for the last decade and I know you have a plethora of knowledge to call upon so I'd be happy to know I'm wrong
Red Bull: 2010 to 2013
Ferrari: 2000 to 2004
McLaren: 1984 to 1986 & 1988 to 1990
Merc: 2014 to 2019
It's roughly on par with McLarens' dominance period, but McLaren still holds the record for the greatest percentage of wins in a single year, with 1988s' 15 out of 16 giving 93.8% (Mercs closest was 90.5% in 2016).
So on balance, I would not personally say it's more prevalent now than ever, but it may well end up being so. It's, however, nothing in comparison to the WRC and Loeb's nine consecutive titles.
I agree it may well end up that way, but it’s still got to beat the McLaren form of the eighties and 88 in particular.It's certainly going that way. We're now in the seventh year of Mercedes dominance, and the dominance is way more consistent, especially when it was Hamilton & Rosberg together. They got 11 1-2 finishes in 2014, 12 in 2015 and 8 in 2016. They also locked out the front row 12 times in 2014, and 15 times 2015 and 2016. Contrast this is Red Bull who got 4 1-2s and 8 lockouts in 2010, 3 and 6 in 2011, 1 1-2 in 2012 with McLaren getting 4 front-row lockouts, and then 4 1-2s and 5 lockouts in 2013. Even though they (or rather Vettel) still came out on top, the racing was much closer.
Without telling me, I know which forum it is. Insufferable bellends.Penalty not necessary for Bottas. I seen so many people foaming at the mouth for a penalty on another forum.
I'm sure a lot of "experts" are already slapping a big asterisk onto this season so that if it does happen, they can pretend like it doesn't count.There's a good chance Mercedes will win all the races this season and finally break the '88 McLaren's record.
McLarens were tragic today...
Hamilton's car is so fast, yet he is saying things like: "the tyres don't feel great" "there is something wrong with the engine"
Why is the problem Mercedes? Why not turn that around and say the problem is the other teams not doing a good enough job?Formula 1 did a great job with those Netflix documentaries. I noticed around me a lot of people regaining interest on it. Problem is.... Mercedes.
More exactly the ridiculous gap between the mercs and the rest that is kicking people back away from F1 because its too obvious and predictable and one of the beauties about sports is uncertain about the results.
Why is the problem Mercedes? Why not turn that around and say the problem is the other teams not doing a good enough job?
yep no instructions to the drivers during formation lap. Some rules...Both Haas cars 10 sec penalty, Magnussen drops to P10
Albon no penalty
Haas penalty is a weird one, they got it for telling the drivers to pit during the formation lap. It's not illegal to pit, but it has to be the drivers initiative. I.e. you cannot tell the drivers what to do during the formation lap.
I agree. All the other teams are hopeless pieces of ****, and will never reverse history. So they should declare defeat, and start a new series without Mercedes. My friend Harvey has been saying for years that the Germans are highly concerned about appearing to be overdogs, and will soon lay down their cudgels. My friend Harvey is also quite daft.Why not turn that around and say the problem is the other teams not doing a good enough job?
Most legendary F1 cars of all time:
Lotus 49
Lotus 72
McLaren MP4-4
Ferrari F2002
Red Bull RB9
Mercedes W11
It's just that good. I'm not a Hamilton fan but my god have Mercedes got it right this year. They're soo far ahead of the game it's unbelievable. We will remember this car for years to come, just like the other cars I have mentioned.
Both Haas cars 10 sec penalty, Magnussen drops to P10
Albon no penalty
Haas penalty is a weird one, they got it for telling the drivers to pit during the formation lap. It's not illegal to pit, but it has to be the drivers initiative. I.e. you cannot tell the drivers what to do during the formation lap.