Formula 1 Rolex Grande Prêmio De São Paulo 2023Formula 1 

  • Thread starter Jimlaad43
  • 173 comments
  • 10,914 views
It literally does deviate and join other lines, multiple times. This is exactly what I was drawing out there
Two of your coloured lines aren't even in the defined "Pit Exit", so again I don't know what you’re going for here. They're literally not part of the "Pit Exit" regulations.

1699139227955.png


Please re-read the regulations I posted.

Not sure what all the poop is about either. If you don't like the regs, that's hardly my problem, nor is it my issue if you don't understand what lines are nor why or where the FIA requires them to be drawn.
 
Two of your coloured lines aren't even in the defined "Pit Exit", so again I don't know what you’re going for here. They're literally not part of the "Pit Exit" regulations.

Please re-read the regulations I posted.
It being part of the pit exit is irrelevant to it being one continuous line.
You say it doesn't deviate or join any othe lines, which is factually incorrect. It does at the red arrows here:
1000008723.png


Your whole argument hinges on the fact that it cannot be defined in any way as anything other than one continuous line, but it absolutely can be.
You are just so stuck in your argument that you are unable or unwilling to admit that it may not be correct. A good argument shows how the others' argument is flawed, a bad argument just declines the others' argument and repeats the same thing over and over. You are doing the last one.


Not sure what all the poop is about either. If you don't like the regs, that's hardly my problem, nor is it my issue if you don't understand what lines are nor why or where the FIA requires them to be drawn.
It's not directed at the rules, it's directed at your inability to argue, and to look critically at your own arguments.
But by all means, stay wrong
 
Last edited:
It being part of the pit exit is irrelevant to it being one continuous line.
If it's not in the Pit Exit it's not part of the Pit Exit regs. I'm not sure how this could be any more obvious.

Again, I posted the regs in full and you're going for something that I don't understand, don't know how is related, and don't follow why.

By the letter of the regs, crossing this line is against the rules, but the FIA is - on this occasion - not considering the letter. Again, I have no issue ignoring this under the spirit, particularly with the other drivers being dicks and correctly being penalised, but the FIA has consistently applied the letter only.

Please try to limit yourself to the letter, not the spirit.

It's not directed at the rules, it's directed at your inability to argue, and to look critically at your own arguments.
But by all means, stay wrong
How terribly "spirit" of you. I've presented facts only, you've presented new definitions of words and ignored the entire principle being discussed, as well as your own interpretations and now just abuse.

I started out by "looking critically" at why the FIA didn't bother investigating it, because it confused me. After combing through all their regs I couldn't find a reason why they wouldn't, hence my question as to why this wasn't a straight, letter-of-the-law breach.

For some reason, you've taken that as a personal challenge, but the one thing you've not done in all of this is the original thing I asked, and continually argued to the spirit of the regs, not the letter. Now you seem to be frustrated and are just lashing out for no good reason.

If you cannot discuss without engaging in personal attacks, consider not bothering to discuss.
 
It being part of the pit exit is irrelevant to it being one continuous line.
You say it doesn't deviate or join any othe lines, which is factually incorrect. It does at the red arrows here:
View attachment 1300770

Your whole argument hinges on the fact that it cannot be defined in any way as anything other than one continuous line, but it absolutely can be.
You are just so stuck in your argument that you are unable or unwilling to admit that it may not be correct. A good argument shows how the others' argument is flawed, a bad argument just declines the others' argument and repeats the same thing over and over. You are doing the last one.


It's not directed at the rules, it's directed at your inability to argue, and to look critically at your own arguments.
But by all means, stay wrong

Go back to the F1 diagram, you’re in the wrong and completely misunderstanding the point being made.
 

Please try to limit yourself to the letter, not the spirit.
You keep saying this, yet you stick to your own interpretation which is not the only valid interpretation by the letter of the rules.

I'm gonna stop responding to this now, as you are way too stubborn
 
Last edited:
You keep saying this, yet you stick to your own interpretation which is not the only valid interpretation by the letter of the rules.

I'm gonna stop responding to this now, as you are way too stubborn
You are mistaken, at least on the first point.

The "interpretation" is the FIA's own. All the documentation is there for you to read. Or not.
 
Mercedes race pace isn't great which is odd, it's usually their strong point. They are just too slow on the straights, moat likely due to the thinner air.
 
Mercedes race pace isn't great which is odd, it's usually their strong point. They are just too slow on the straights, moat likely due to the thinner air.
Would be weird if it's the thinner air, as they did just fine in Mexico
 
Glad Lando was able to claw a place back to finish 2nd.

Mercs didn't pose as much of a threat as I thought they would.

Hope Ricciardo has a better day tomorrow. Yuki did well today.
 
Hamilton did well in Mexico but Russell didn't. The AT's were exeptionally fast here today too using the same engine. Mercedes may well just be really bad on tyre deg with softs as their first laps were quick.
 
Quality racing all race long. The Mercs will have problems tomorrow. Great to see the Alpha Tauri bringing the fight to Mercedes, Mclaren and Ferrari. Perez still so far behind in his rocket ship.

Max and Lando in a league of their own until Max got the all clear for his tyres and then it was done.
 
I thought Leclerc was supposed to qualify on pole before he threw it away...
 
Would Ferrari be allowed to repair Charles' car under red flag even if he didn't take the start?
 
Would Ferrari be allowed to repair Charles' car under red flag even if he didn't take the start?
If they had the car in the pitlane, I think they could (probably too much work though). But they don't have it there
 
Back