GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,552
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Gary Slater (@AudiMan2011) on August 20th, 2020 in the Forza Horizon 4 category.
Still boring we have to grind for rehashed content.It's not hard to win at all lmao
Nice, rehashing content from the game before and making it a hard to win prize. Slowly loosing hope with Forza every day.
Still boring we have to grind for rehashed content.
Play the game for two hours? Are you absurd?! I don't even want to open up the game ever, I just want the cars!3% for the photo challenge (takes literally 30 seconds)
15% for the Weekly Forzathon (15-20 minutes)
6% per PR Stunt/18% (let's round them up to 5 minutes each, the Bamburgh Castle jump this week is a bit harder than the others)
6% per championship/18% (roughly 15 minutes each)
That's 54% for just around 2h of play, which you can achieve at your own leisure, or 61% if you also do all daily Forzathon challenges. That's literally the easiest way to get 50% completion, and nothing you have to do is difficult in any way, shape or form. You don't even need to go online!
We don't have the same definition of grinding...
For sure, I'm still waiting for an AU or BA Falcon to appear.Just hoping they add the Ford Falcon XR8 next.
Still boring we have to grind for rehashed content.
There's hardly any need for a defence if the criticism is as lacklustre as this. If my aunt had testicles she'd be my uncle.If you gave this game the physics of NFS Heat, it could turn out worse than Heat itself.
Eh, nah, not really. Odd things just get pointed out as odd. Pretty simple really. You’re testament to that fact.People here are too defensive when it comes to criticism towards the game
Odd things just get pointed out as odd.
"Let's give it the physics of another game and criticise it on that basis" doesn't strike you as odd?“Odd things” meaning all criticism that isn’t sugar-coated in layers of cotton candy.
"Let's give it the physics of another game and criticise it on that basis" doesn't strike you as odd?
Looks more like a difference of opinions to me rather than any criticism based in fact, as far as this thread is concerned.I wasn’t arguing in favor of that particular viewpoint, but some individuals here only seem to chime in when criticism isn’t covered in cotton candy.
K. Whatever makes you feel better. Talk about ironic about chiming in at certain times.“Odd things” meaning all criticism that isn’t sugar-coated in layers of cotton candy.
You've literally did just that just without the "cotton candy" or so you claim dude, but okay. 👍I wasn’t arguing in favor of that particular viewpoint, but some individuals here only seem to chime in when criticism isn’t covered in cotton candy.
K. Whatever makes you feel better. Talk about ironic about chiming in at certain times.
Like I said, what ever makes you feel better.I chimed in because this whole “odd things just get pointed out as odd” is a serious understatement. HyperSpeeder hits the nail on the head with the remark that this forum section, in general, has issues when it comes to dealing with complaints, whether directed at the game or the decision-making behind. Valid complaints shared here over the years have oftentimes been completely overshadowed because the criticism immediately was accused of being “asinine” or something similar.
There have even been numerous examples of complaints that were semi-mocked whenever brought up in the community, but later adressed by the developers. Then all of a sudden you’ll see the former apologists making 180 degree turns and say stuff like “the developers made the right decision here”. Absolutely pathetic.
Every now and then it’s fair enough to question a ridiculous statement, if it’s legitimately odd. Only problem is there’s always someone ready to defend poor decision-making in game development - for whatever reasons...
HyperSpeeder hits the nail on the head with the remark that this forum section, in general, has issues when it comes to dealing with complaints, whether directed at the game or the decision-making behind.
If you gave this game the physics of NFS Heat, it could turn out worse than Heat itself.
The grind is because... See, Xbox Game Pass has a statistic called "most played". If you force people to spend time unlocking a car, these hours add up and keep the game high on the list. Not that FH4 needs it to place high, but the extra boost is appreciated.
Grind? You call just having to do a couple of races to unlock a car a "grind"?! HAH!Still boring we have to grind for rehashed content.
If you force people to spend time unlocking a car, these hours add up and keep the game high on the list. Not that FH4 needs it to place high, but the extra boost is appreciated.
But of course, as you're want to do, Nielsen, you only really come around to offer a contrarian viewpoint, which means often times agreeing with people with weak sauce 'criticisms' like HyperSpeeder, and trying to tut-tut the forum for not allowing open spaces for debate, or whatever. If it really bugs you that much, bring it up with moderators, and let them decide. For now, people will disagree, as they have been doing, especially when they are lacking in any sort weight to said criticisms.
But it doesn’t make Forza any worse, it actually does absolutely nothing to Forza, to have an opinion that differs from someone else. It literally has ZERO affect on Forza. Poor us for not getting a free new car handed to us this time, we’re all absolutely devastated.I generally don't agree with "weak sauce" criticism, and I don't agree with any of the criticism toward the game in this thread. What I agreed with was the remark that the community in general defend the bad decisions which deliberately make Forza worse than it needs to be. Not in this thread specifically (but it was brought up in this thread for some reason).